Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

agnos.is Forums

  1. Home
  2. Technology
  3. Elon Musk wants to rewrite "the entire corpus of human knowledge" with Grok

Elon Musk wants to rewrite "the entire corpus of human knowledge" with Grok

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Technology
technology
198 Posts 158 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • P [email protected]

    We will use Grok 3.5 (maybe we should call it 4), which has advanced reasoning, to rewrite the entire corpus of human knowledge, adding missing information and deleting errors.

    Then retrain on that.

    Far too much garbage in any foundation model trained on uncorrected data.

    Source.

    ::: spoiler More Context

    Source.

    Source.
    :::

    W This user is from outside of this forum
    W This user is from outside of this forum
    [email protected]
    wrote last edited by
    #103

    Meme image: Elon ducking his own tiny nub.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
    • A [email protected]

      asdf

      thegreenwizard@lemmy.zipT This user is from outside of this forum
      thegreenwizard@lemmy.zipT This user is from outside of this forum
      [email protected]
      wrote last edited by
      #104

      Wikipedia gives lists of their sources, judge what you read based off of that. Or just skip to the sources and read them instead.

      A I 2 Replies Last reply
      10
      • A [email protected]

        Elon should seriously see a medical professional.

        D This user is from outside of this forum
        D This user is from outside of this forum
        [email protected]
        wrote last edited by
        #105

        I'll have you know he's seeing a medical professional at least once a day. Sometimes multiple times!!!!

        (On an absolutely and completely unrelated note ketamine dealers are medical professionals, yeah?)

        1 Reply Last reply
        4
        • P [email protected]

          We will use Grok 3.5 (maybe we should call it 4), which has advanced reasoning, to rewrite the entire corpus of human knowledge, adding missing information and deleting errors.

          Then retrain on that.

          Far too much garbage in any foundation model trained on uncorrected data.

          Source.

          ::: spoiler More Context

          Source.

          Source.
          :::

          M This user is from outside of this forum
          M This user is from outside of this forum
          [email protected]
          wrote last edited by
          #106

          i'll allow it so long as grok acknowledges that musk was made rich from inherited wealth that was created using an apartheid emerald mine.

          1 Reply Last reply
          1
          • P [email protected]

            We will use Grok 3.5 (maybe we should call it 4), which has advanced reasoning, to rewrite the entire corpus of human knowledge, adding missing information and deleting errors.

            Then retrain on that.

            Far too much garbage in any foundation model trained on uncorrected data.

            Source.

            ::: spoiler More Context

            Source.

            Source.
            :::

            blackmist@feddit.ukB This user is from outside of this forum
            blackmist@feddit.ukB This user is from outside of this forum
            [email protected]
            wrote last edited by
            #107

            I'm sure the second Grok in the human centipede will find that very nutritious.

            If you use that Grok, you'll be third in the centipede. Enjoy.

            1 Reply Last reply
            1
            • thegreenwizard@lemmy.zipT [email protected]

              Wikipedia gives lists of their sources, judge what you read based off of that. Or just skip to the sources and read them instead.

              A This user is from outside of this forum
              A This user is from outside of this forum
              [email protected]
              wrote last edited by [email protected]
              #108

              asdf

              1 Reply Last reply
              1
              • D [email protected]

                adding missing information and deleting errors

                Which is to say, "I'm sick of Grok accurately portraying me as an evil dipshit, so I'm going to feed it a bunch of right-wing talking points and get rid of anything that hurts my feelings."

                b3an@lemmy.worldB This user is from outside of this forum
                b3an@lemmy.worldB This user is from outside of this forum
                [email protected]
                wrote last edited by
                #109

                That is definitely how I read it.

                History can’t just be ‘rewritten’ by A.I. and taken as truth. That’s fucking stupid.

                G 1 Reply Last reply
                9
                • P [email protected]

                  We will use Grok 3.5 (maybe we should call it 4), which has advanced reasoning, to rewrite the entire corpus of human knowledge, adding missing information and deleting errors.

                  Then retrain on that.

                  Far too much garbage in any foundation model trained on uncorrected data.

                  Source.

                  ::: spoiler More Context

                  Source.

                  Source.
                  :::

                  B This user is from outside of this forum
                  B This user is from outside of this forum
                  [email protected]
                  wrote last edited by
                  #110

                  advanced reasoning

                  If it's so advanced, it should be able to reason out that all human knowledge is standing in the shoulders of others and how errors have prompted us to explore other areas and learn things we never would have otherwise.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  2
                  • P [email protected]

                    We will use Grok 3.5 (maybe we should call it 4), which has advanced reasoning, to rewrite the entire corpus of human knowledge, adding missing information and deleting errors.

                    Then retrain on that.

                    Far too much garbage in any foundation model trained on uncorrected data.

                    Source.

                    ::: spoiler More Context

                    Source.

                    Source.
                    :::

                    K This user is from outside of this forum
                    K This user is from outside of this forum
                    [email protected]
                    wrote last edited by
                    #111

                    Don't feed the trolls.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    7
                    • P [email protected]

                      We will use Grok 3.5 (maybe we should call it 4), which has advanced reasoning, to rewrite the entire corpus of human knowledge, adding missing information and deleting errors.

                      Then retrain on that.

                      Far too much garbage in any foundation model trained on uncorrected data.

                      Source.

                      ::: spoiler More Context

                      Source.

                      Source.
                      :::

                      B This user is from outside of this forum
                      B This user is from outside of this forum
                      [email protected]
                      wrote last edited by
                      #112

                      [My] translation: "I want to rewrite history to what I want".

                      K 1 Reply Last reply
                      60
                      • N [email protected]

                        Wikipedia is quite resilient - you can even put it on a USB drive. As long as you have a free operating system, there will always be ways to access it.

                        D This user is from outside of this forum
                        D This user is from outside of this forum
                        [email protected]
                        wrote last edited by
                        #113

                        I keep a partial local copy of Wikipedia on my phone and backup device with an app called Kiwix. Great if you need access to certain items in remote areas with no access to the internet.

                        W 1 Reply Last reply
                        3
                        • K [email protected]

                          Thinking wikipedia or other unbiased sources will still be available in a decade or so is wishful thinking. Once the digital stranglehold kicks in, it'll be mandatory sign-in with gov vetted identity provider and your sources will be limited to what that gov allows you to see. MMW.

                          C This user is from outside of this forum
                          C This user is from outside of this forum
                          [email protected]
                          wrote last edited by
                          #114

                          Yes. There will be no websites only AI and apps. You will be automatically logged in to the apps. Linux, Lemmy will be baned. We will be classed as hackers and criminals. We probably have to build our own mesh network for communication or access it from a secret location.

                          J 1 Reply Last reply
                          2
                          • A [email protected]

                            asdf

                            S This user is from outside of this forum
                            S This user is from outside of this forum
                            [email protected]
                            wrote last edited by
                            #115

                            Wikipedia is not a trustworthy source of information for anything regarding contemporary politics or economics.

                            Wikipedia presents the views of reliable sources on notable topics. The trick is what sources are considered "reliable" and what topics are "notable", which is why it's such a poor source of information for things like contemporary politics in particular.

                            A 2 Replies Last reply
                            7
                            • hupf@feddit.orgH [email protected]

                              1.68 IQ move

                              S This user is from outside of this forum
                              S This user is from outside of this forum
                              [email protected]
                              wrote last edited by
                              #116

                              More like 0.7056 IQ move.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              1
                              • const_void@lemmy.mlC [email protected]

                                Guessing some kind of PR campaign that he purchased to make him look like a genius on TV and movies.

                                kami@lemmy.dbzer0.comK This user is from outside of this forum
                                kami@lemmy.dbzer0.comK This user is from outside of this forum
                                [email protected]
                                wrote last edited by
                                #117

                                It took a while but in the end we found out why the internet was full of Putin and Musk's memes a few years ago.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • B [email protected]

                                  We have seen from his many other comments about this, that he just wants a propaganda bot that regurgitates all of the right wing talking points. So that will definitely be easier to achieve if he does it that way.

                                  S This user is from outside of this forum
                                  S This user is from outside of this forum
                                  [email protected]
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #118

                                  that he just wants a propaganda bot that regurgitates all of the right wing talking points.

                                  Then he has utterly failed with Grok. One of my new favorite pastimes is watching right wingers get angry that Grok won't support their most obviously counterfactual bullshit and then proceed to try to argue it into saying something they can declare a win from.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  1
                                  • thegreenwizard@lemmy.zipT [email protected]

                                    Wikipedia gives lists of their sources, judge what you read based off of that. Or just skip to the sources and read them instead.

                                    I This user is from outside of this forum
                                    I This user is from outside of this forum
                                    [email protected]
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #119

                                    Just because Wikipedia offers a list of references doesn't mean that those references reflect what knowledge is actually out there. Wikipedia is trying to be academically rigorous without any of the real work. A big part of doing academic research is reading articles and studies that are wrong or which prove the null hypothesis. That's why we need experts and not just an AI to regurgitate information. Wikipedia is useful if people understand it's limitations, I think a lot of people don't though.

                                    thegreenwizard@lemmy.zipT 1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • B [email protected]

                                      [My] translation: "I want to rewrite history to what I want".

                                      K This user is from outside of this forum
                                      K This user is from outside of this forum
                                      [email protected]
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #120

                                      That was my first impression, but then it shifted into "I want my AI to be the shittiest of them all".

                                      diplomjodler3@lemmy.worldD 1 Reply Last reply
                                      9
                                      • P [email protected]

                                        We will use Grok 3.5 (maybe we should call it 4), which has advanced reasoning, to rewrite the entire corpus of human knowledge, adding missing information and deleting errors.

                                        Then retrain on that.

                                        Far too much garbage in any foundation model trained on uncorrected data.

                                        Source.

                                        ::: spoiler More Context

                                        Source.

                                        Source.
                                        :::

                                        B This user is from outside of this forum
                                        B This user is from outside of this forum
                                        [email protected]
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #121

                                        Not sure if has been said already. Fuck musk.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        5
                                        • P [email protected]

                                          We will use Grok 3.5 (maybe we should call it 4), which has advanced reasoning, to rewrite the entire corpus of human knowledge, adding missing information and deleting errors.

                                          Then retrain on that.

                                          Far too much garbage in any foundation model trained on uncorrected data.

                                          Source.

                                          ::: spoiler More Context

                                          Source.

                                          Source.
                                          :::

                                          N This user is from outside of this forum
                                          N This user is from outside of this forum
                                          [email protected]
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #122

                                          Elon Musk, like most pseudo intellectuals, has a very shallow understanding of things. Human knowledge is full of holes, and they cannot simply be resolved through logic, which Mush the dweeb imagines.

                                          why0y@lemmy.mlW 1 Reply Last reply
                                          36
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups