Trump threatens 'far larger' tariffs if EU and Canada unite to do 'economic harm' to the U.S.
-
This post did not contain any content.
The trump regime’s only purpose is to TANK the US economy so that stocks, businesses, and industries can be bought by billionaires at rock bottom prices.
-
I agree. He seems to think countries should be paying tribute to the US.
-
This post did not contain any content.
do economic harm to the US
.... Like the economic harm you're doing to Europe and Canada?
You're literally that bully that's starts screaming "don't hit ME!" when the victims punch back
-
The trump regime’s only purpose is to TANK the US economy so that stocks, businesses, and industries can be bought by billionaires at rock bottom prices.
Ding ding ding. We have a winner
-
::: spoiler (cross-community) mega post ?
.
at ... [email protected]
and [email protected]
... same post + same article ... here :
https://lemmy.world/post/27449740 (L.W)
https://lemmy.world/post/27445411 (.au)
.
at !Economy
... same post + same article ... here :
https://lemmy.world/post/27444207at !Economics
... same post + same article ... here :
https://lemmy.world/post/27449188at [email protected]
article :
https://www.nytimes.com/2025/03/27/world/europe/trump-tariff-threat-canada-eu.html
... same news ... here :
https://lemmy.world/post/27449187
:::Counting 9:
https://lemm.ee/post/59609761 in News on lemmy.world (archived NYTimes)
https://lemm.ee/post/59609758 in World News on lemmy.world (archived NYTimes)
https://lemmy.wtf/post/18687996 in World News on lemmy.world (NYTimes)
https://lemm.ee/post/59602266 in World News on lemmy.world (CNBC)
https://lemmy.world/post/27449187 in Europe on feddit.org (NYTimes)
https://lemmy.world/post/27449188 in Economics on lemmy.world (CNBC)
https://lemmit.online/post/5503734 in World News on lemmit.online (CNBC)
https://lemmy.zip/post/34983571 in World News on quokk.au (CNBC)
https://lemmy.wtf/post/18680610 in Economy on lemmey.world (CNBC) -
I'm not well read on india's modern manufacturing capabilities, but I do know that they have been trying for a while to up their manufacturing exports and entice jobs that would normally go to china. 1 billion ppl is a competitive sized workforce.
If America and EU needed an immediate substitute, india could fit the bill.
-
This post did not contain any content.
What an absolute DOTARD
-
To be fair, if you look at it from the perspective of a narcissist who has never been told "no" his entire life, it makes perfect sense.
-
This post did not contain any content.
-
I'm sorry, but I completely disagree. I don't see any evidence for this vassal worldview (apart from extreme cases like Belarus and Russia). Without that first assumption the whole premise falls apart.
Even assuming the main characters (MC) and vassals idea is true to reality, the rest of the argument is flimsy at best. Even if a MC loses a vassal through mismanagement or foreign interference, that doesn't automatically mean that the vassal has a new MC overlord. They could be in a limbo state where some of the MCs are vying for control.
As for Trump, I think it's much less of a stretch to assume that Trump loves the sound of his own voice and what better way to hear his own voice than to create sound bites, hence the 51st state nonsense. If anything Trump's actions say to me that he has NO capacity for the mental mapping required to envision this kind of complex interweaving of interests and angles that is geopolitics. I find it even less likely that this is the one he would subscribe to.
Maybe vassals is too strong-worded to describe the phenomenon. But living in western Europe I have firsthand experience in the relationship between the US and my country in the past decades. The US offered protection to the "free world", but of course this comes at a price. The US had to be regarded as a role model in many ways, and everything that came out of the US, was copied and implemented verbatim. Which made the US the de facto puppet master and they really liked that role. This relationship was carefully orchestrated and nurtured by the US from the end of WW2 onwards, and the effect was that European countries embraced this strategy and viewed the US in a positive light, no obvious power play or bullying necessary. But the fact is, there always was a strong dependency on the US, and this was by US design.
Trump doesn't realize that there was good reason for choosing such a "soft" strategy, he can't because bullying is his only available tactic. He will soon find out that his perceived european vassal states don't respond as well to hostility and blackmail as he might have expected.
-
Maybe vassals is too strong-worded to describe the phenomenon. But living in western Europe I have firsthand experience in the relationship between the US and my country in the past decades. The US offered protection to the "free world", but of course this comes at a price. The US had to be regarded as a role model in many ways, and everything that came out of the US, was copied and implemented verbatim. Which made the US the de facto puppet master and they really liked that role. This relationship was carefully orchestrated and nurtured by the US from the end of WW2 onwards, and the effect was that European countries embraced this strategy and viewed the US in a positive light, no obvious power play or bullying necessary. But the fact is, there always was a strong dependency on the US, and this was by US design.
Trump doesn't realize that there was good reason for choosing such a "soft" strategy, he can't because bullying is his only available tactic. He will soon find out that his perceived european vassal states don't respond as well to hostility and blackmail as he might have expected.
I see what you're saying, although I think it was a joint effort by the US and the EU. And it was short-sighted on both their parts.
The EU is feeling the heat that comes from a lapse in personal security and the US will find out that they aren't the power they thought they were without their allies.
If Trump isn't corrected it could all come crashing down for the US and the EU.
-
Hey dipshit (not OP), the whole point of tariffs is to reduce imports. Of course a, sane person would ramp them up over time to allow any domestic production the chance to fill the gaps.
Why would you want to reduce imports anyway?
“China is sending us cheap cars! What are we gonna do?!”
Idk man, drive the cars and use the money you saved for something else? Seems like a good deal to me.
-
Counting 9:
https://lemm.ee/post/59609761 in News on lemmy.world (archived NYTimes)
https://lemm.ee/post/59609758 in World News on lemmy.world (archived NYTimes)
https://lemmy.wtf/post/18687996 in World News on lemmy.world (NYTimes)
https://lemm.ee/post/59602266 in World News on lemmy.world (CNBC)
https://lemmy.world/post/27449187 in Europe on feddit.org (NYTimes)
https://lemmy.world/post/27449188 in Economics on lemmy.world (CNBC)
https://lemmit.online/post/5503734 in World News on lemmit.online (CNBC)
https://lemmy.zip/post/34983571 in World News on quokk.au (CNBC)
https://lemmy.wtf/post/18680610 in Economy on lemmey.world (CNBC)Ouch ! ... + it will get worse over time
one more at :
[email protected]
here :
https://lemmy.world/post/27457780
(NYTimes) -
Why would you want to reduce imports anyway?
“China is sending us cheap cars! What are we gonna do?!”
Idk man, drive the cars and use the money you saved for something else? Seems like a good deal to me.
They are often done to ensure local production of critical infrastructure or to compensate foreign markets from subsidizing their exports
-
This post did not contain any content.
The only person doing economic harm to the US is him.
-
I agree. He seems to think countries should be paying tribute to the US.
No "seems" necessary. Just look at him and Vance berating Zelenskyy for not thanking them.
-
They are often done to ensure local production of critical infrastructure or to compensate foreign markets from subsidizing their exports
I get the premise, it just seems silly. If a foreign company wants to give you steeply-discounted stuff, it seems like you ought to take the cheap stuff and enjoy it rather than worry about being unable to sell the same stuff as cheaply.
-
I'm pretty sure that was deliberate. Bush didn't want a soundbite of him saying shame on me.
Yeah, it's really a rare instance of quick thinking on his part (relatively)
-
This post did not contain any content.
"I plan to shoot myself on the dick EVEN HARDER this time"
-
Ding ding ding. We have a winner
Not that I am doubting this as a tactic but has this been reported in my any large organisations?
