Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

agnos.is Forums

  1. Home
  2. Europe
  3. Scandinavian countries calls for strong EU measures against e-commerce ‘wild west’

Scandinavian countries calls for strong EU measures against e-commerce ‘wild west’

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Europe
europe
13 Posts 7 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • S [email protected]

    I wasn't even aware that certain retailers can completely bypass rules of EU or country level quality standards. I thought those were enforced already.

    H This user is from outside of this forum
    H This user is from outside of this forum
    [email protected]
    wrote on last edited by
    #4

    It's the sheer volume of b2c goods coming in from outside the EU, they just can't check it all.

    F 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • D [email protected]
      This post did not contain any content.
      K This user is from outside of this forum
      K This user is from outside of this forum
      [email protected]
      wrote on last edited by
      #5

      It's the Chinese platform Temu and Aliexpress that abuses de minimis exemption shipping garbage quality items at low price.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • H [email protected]

        It's the sheer volume of b2c goods coming in from outside the EU, they just can't check it all.

        F This user is from outside of this forum
        F This user is from outside of this forum
        [email protected]
        wrote on last edited by
        #6

        Why aren't they banning infringing exporters?

        B 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • F [email protected]

          Why aren't they banning infringing exporters?

          B This user is from outside of this forum
          B This user is from outside of this forum
          [email protected]
          wrote on last edited by
          #7

          Afaik, TEMU is only a broker between hundreds of exporters and the customer (who is also the importer). Banning the exporter of basically useless, they just reopen under a new name.

          F 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • B [email protected]

            Afaik, TEMU is only a broker between hundreds of exporters and the customer (who is also the importer). Banning the exporter of basically useless, they just reopen under a new name.

            F This user is from outside of this forum
            F This user is from outside of this forum
            [email protected]
            wrote on last edited by
            #8

            I assume they'd still have to register a new account with temu and lose their reviews? Being diligent about that seems already like a good start, at first glance...

            H 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • F [email protected]

              I assume they'd still have to register a new account with temu and lose their reviews? Being diligent about that seems already like a good start, at first glance...

              H This user is from outside of this forum
              H This user is from outside of this forum
              [email protected]
              wrote on last edited by
              #9

              If they'd ban Temu, which they currently don't seem to have legal ground for, Temu would just stop printing their logo on the labels. New sender address, done. It's not like the follow laws now anyway. They also lie about the value of packages to avoid paying import taxes.

              F 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • H [email protected]

                If they'd ban Temu, which they currently don't seem to have legal ground for, Temu would just stop printing their logo on the labels. New sender address, done. It's not like the follow laws now anyway. They also lie about the value of packages to avoid paying import taxes.

                F This user is from outside of this forum
                F This user is from outside of this forum
                [email protected]
                wrote on last edited by
                #10

                Nah I'm talking about temu's sellers. Sure it would be a game of chicken but it's a start

                H 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • F [email protected]

                  Nah I'm talking about temu's sellers. Sure it would be a game of chicken but it's a start

                  H This user is from outside of this forum
                  H This user is from outside of this forum
                  [email protected]
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #11

                  Then it again comes down to volume. It'd be lot of work, so EU would need to spend money. I don't think they consider it a big enough problem (yet).

                  F 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • H [email protected]

                    Then it again comes down to volume. It'd be lot of work, so EU would need to spend money. I don't think they consider it a big enough problem (yet).

                    F This user is from outside of this forum
                    F This user is from outside of this forum
                    [email protected]
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #12

                    They could do:

                    • Keep current rate of random checks
                    • Whenever an infringing product is detected, ban exporter
                    • That way, from then on, all automated checks trash that exporter. (I'm thinking integration with the postal service)

                    Hopefully it'll be a pain in their arse to some extent

                    H 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • F [email protected]

                      They could do:

                      • Keep current rate of random checks
                      • Whenever an infringing product is detected, ban exporter
                      • That way, from then on, all automated checks trash that exporter. (I'm thinking integration with the postal service)

                      Hopefully it'll be a pain in their arse to some extent

                      H This user is from outside of this forum
                      H This user is from outside of this forum
                      [email protected]
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #13

                      It might work, but the EU doesn't have a central entry point / organisation handling the mail so the legislation needs to be airtight if you want this to be effective.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • System shared this topic on
                      Reply
                      • Reply as topic
                      Log in to reply
                      • Oldest to Newest
                      • Newest to Oldest
                      • Most Votes


                      • Login

                      • Login or register to search.
                      • First post
                        Last post
                      0
                      • Categories
                      • Recent
                      • Tags
                      • Popular
                      • World
                      • Users
                      • Groups