Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

agnos.is Forums

  1. Home
  2. Technology
  3. 'An Insult To Life Itself': Hayao Miyazaki’s AI Criticism Resurfaces As OpenAI’s Ghibli-Style Image Trend Takes Over Social Media

'An Insult To Life Itself': Hayao Miyazaki’s AI Criticism Resurfaces As OpenAI’s Ghibli-Style Image Trend Takes Over Social Media

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Technology
technology
194 Posts 79 Posters 4 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • fishos@lemmy.worldF [email protected]

    Tell me you've never seen a Studio Ghibli movie without telling me you've never seen a single Studio Ghibli movie. Literally every one of them contains some "advancing technology isn't necessarily a good thing and the old ways have value" message. If AI were in one of their movies, it's be a oozing black oil demon monstrosity spitting soot into the air.

    It'd be like Banksy doing advertisement for Nestle. It's just so contrary to the message they put out.

    I This user is from outside of this forum
    I This user is from outside of this forum
    [email protected]
    wrote on last edited by
    #73

    A message about technology isn't the same as labeling AI as "an insult to life itself."

    This guy simply sound like a bigot. His studio is going to rely on AI in any case through the software they are using. If they use photoshop they are already using AI.

    fishos@lemmy.worldF 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • E [email protected]

      Well it kind of does because if I don't have a job then I don't get money, And I need that to buy things like food and shelter. And yes that's because of the way society is set up but since it's the way every single society on Earth is set up, I think we have a problem.

      There has never been a culture on Earth at any point in history that didn't have some version of money.

      P This user is from outside of this forum
      P This user is from outside of this forum
      [email protected]
      wrote on last edited by
      #74

      I know what you were saying, but you've missed the point.

      There has never been a culture on Earth at any point in history that didn't have some version of money.

      What? Of course there has.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • B [email protected]

        Bigoted against what?? A machine? The money grubbing assholes who are using those machines to profit on other people's work without giving them a dime in compensation? Who the hell are you defending here?

        Studio Ghibli and their artists put in millions of hours collectively to create works if absolute art. Sam Altman just borrowed millions of dollars to rip them off.

        I This user is from outside of this forum
        I This user is from outside of this forum
        [email protected]
        wrote on last edited by
        #75

        Bigoted against a tool that is going to change the industry and digital art, the same way computers did back in the day.

        If you throw AI at your hand draw 20 frames per second you are going to get the smoothest film ever and that's just a stupid example. You can use AI for a thousand things already from the story boards to your final work.

        ? 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • P [email protected]

          Yes, only one thing can be an "insult to life". GOOD point.

          I This user is from outside of this forum
          I This user is from outside of this forum
          [email protected]
          wrote on last edited by
          #76

          I think we all agree here that japanese work ethics are shit

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • E [email protected]

            If we didn't have copyright then people wouldn't be able to justify putting effort into creating content because they wouldn't be guaranteed financial compensation for the time and effort they put in.

            Everything costs money, If I'm writing a novel I still have to pay the bills I still have to buy groceries I still have to pay for water and electricity I need to be compensated for my time.

            ayaya@lemdro.idA This user is from outside of this forum
            ayaya@lemdro.idA This user is from outside of this forum
            [email protected]
            wrote on last edited by
            #77

            If we didn't have copyright then people wouldn't be able to justify putting effort into creating content because they wouldn't be guaranteed financial compensation for the time and effort they put in.

            The irony of saying this on Lemmy. Lemmy is piece of software developed and distributed for free to people who host it for free. If somebody truly wants to make something they will create it even without profit incentive.

            K 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • A [email protected]

              Miyazaki is my favorite angry old man.

              ? Offline
              ? Offline
              Guest
              wrote on last edited by
              #78

              he's a shitty father though.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • moe90@feddit.nlM [email protected]
                This post did not contain any content.
                S This user is from outside of this forum
                S This user is from outside of this forum
                [email protected]
                wrote on last edited by
                #79

                Next you're going to tell me using someones artstyle to depict someone getting deported is not appropriate for the white house twitter

                nostradavid@programming.devN 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • M [email protected]

                  You think you could?

                  I think the minute it gets popular the lawyers start getting paid

                  P This user is from outside of this forum
                  P This user is from outside of this forum
                  [email protected]
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #80

                  Ever hear of Avalanches? Their music is incredible and it's made entirely from samples, including some from well known artists such as the Beatles.

                  Though they are kind of the exception as their second album took 16 years to complete, in no small part due to asking permission for every sample.

                  But there's entire genres of music that either utilize samples, or are literally constructed completely from them.

                  Girl Talk is another one that comes to mind. It's pretty much entire albums full of mashups.

                  DJ Shadow is a legend who, I believe, only uses vinyl for sampling.

                  Hip hop would not have survived without sampling. Listen to Madlib and J Dilla. Check out Wu-Tang Clan and listen to some of RZA's beats.

                  Check out MF DOOM's producer alter ego (Metal Fingers). Dude put out an entire series of instrumental tracks made using samples called "Special Herbs," that both he and other hip hop artists have used for backing tracks.

                  Beastie Boys were one of the first to do it with Paul's Boutique.

                  I would bet that the majority of music that's out there that is sample-based has not been approved by the original owners of the pieces. They only really get targeted if it becomes popular, which is why Avalanches chose to go the route of getting approvals.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • B [email protected]

                    The way Altman whines about how much he should be allowed to steal people's work to feed his bottom line, I have no doubt whatsoever that this is the case.

                    A This user is from outside of this forum
                    A This user is from outside of this forum
                    [email protected]
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #81

                    Altman doesn’t seemed to be concerned with consent in general.

                    natanox@discuss.tchncs.deN D 2 Replies Last reply
                    0
                    • F [email protected]

                      The bigger problem here is the loss of jobs and we are talking about a huge loss of employment that will affect economies really hard. The future looks more and more bleak.

                      T This user is from outside of this forum
                      T This user is from outside of this forum
                      [email protected]
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #82

                      This is why I still have a coal furnace to heat my house. So many people just use furnaces without thinking of the displaced economic value.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • E [email protected]

                        What about the transition.

                        Because this will take time to happen, and the thing about not eating because you have literally no money, is it's a rather immediate concern. You can't just wait a decade or so for everyone to sort it out.

                        underpantsweevil@lemmy.worldU This user is from outside of this forum
                        underpantsweevil@lemmy.worldU This user is from outside of this forum
                        [email protected]
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #83

                        What about the transition.

                        It'll likely be a bloodsoaked mess, given the history of these things.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • I [email protected]

                          A message about technology isn't the same as labeling AI as "an insult to life itself."

                          This guy simply sound like a bigot. His studio is going to rely on AI in any case through the software they are using. If they use photoshop they are already using AI.

                          fishos@lemmy.worldF This user is from outside of this forum
                          fishos@lemmy.worldF This user is from outside of this forum
                          [email protected]
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #84

                          I'm at such a loss for words having read such ignorance spouted as truth. You are truly a master sophist.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • E [email protected]

                            That will only happen if a society completely is reorganized to get rid of money or if they introduce universal basic income (at a rate that actually allows people to live).

                            Realistically I can't see either of those things happening.

                            K This user is from outside of this forum
                            K This user is from outside of this forum
                            [email protected]
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #85

                            Just shifting the tax burden from salaries toward capital should make it less of a problem. When capital income is taxed less than salaries wealth concentration gets worse as workers are replaced.

                            But hey, GDP line goes up, so it must be good right?

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • M [email protected]

                              I don't care about copyrights. I care about content.

                              xthexder@l.sw0.comX This user is from outside of this forum
                              xthexder@l.sw0.comX This user is from outside of this forum
                              [email protected]
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #86

                              Better content?
                              Lol
                              Lmao even.

                              M 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • underpantsweevil@lemmy.worldU [email protected]

                                The bigger problem here is the loss of jobs and we are talking about a huge loss of employment that will affect economies really hard.

                                I would say that's a tangential problem. Because, you know, in theory...

                                But the deeper problem is ultimately in expertise as a learned skill developed over time and through practice. If you're de-skilling work, you're dismantling the tools by which we train the next generation of artists and production crews. If we were just replacing humans with machines for some route manual labor (like Pixar replaced Disney's old hand drawn animations with a newer CGI look), the result would be a new style and perhaps less tendentious from route reproductions.

                                But we're gutting the whole process of development which means you're losing the pool of skilled professionals who know how to create CGI (or even flip-book style 60s animation) from first principles. That means sacrificing whole fields of specialized expertise for... what? This?

                                xthexder@l.sw0.comX This user is from outside of this forum
                                xthexder@l.sw0.comX This user is from outside of this forum
                                [email protected]
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #87

                                I've seen pretty much the same thing happening in the programming space. In another 10 years there's going to be a massive shortage of senior programmers who are capable of doing anything more complicated than the AI, and able to sort out the messes everyone's creating with it.

                                All the companies not wanting to hire entry level programmers right now is also a big problem for those starting now. I can only hope companies realize AI is not a replacement for a human's learning ability.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • P [email protected]

                                  "A real labor of love"

                                  Christ. It's like people cosplaying as real artists.

                                  xthexder@l.sw0.comX This user is from outside of this forum
                                  xthexder@l.sw0.comX This user is from outside of this forum
                                  [email protected]
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #88

                                  I'm not sure Sam Altman even knows what labor is.

                                  P 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • xthexder@l.sw0.comX [email protected]

                                    Better content?
                                    Lol
                                    Lmao even.

                                    M This user is from outside of this forum
                                    M This user is from outside of this forum
                                    [email protected]
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #89

                                    Absolutely. The Internet pre monetization was way better than anything today.

                                    xthexder@l.sw0.comX 1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • M [email protected]

                                      Absolutely. The Internet pre monetization was way better than anything today.

                                      xthexder@l.sw0.comX This user is from outside of this forum
                                      xthexder@l.sw0.comX This user is from outside of this forum
                                      [email protected]
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #90

                                      I agree with this, but I don't think we'll ever be able to have that again. AI slop is drowning out all the genuine content regardless of monetization.
                                      What's the incentive to put hours of effort into something if nobody will ever see it because every hour another 1000 AI versions were generated and they're all "close enough" to fool someone not paying attention?

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • A [email protected]

                                        Altman doesn’t seemed to be concerned with consent in general.

                                        natanox@discuss.tchncs.deN This user is from outside of this forum
                                        natanox@discuss.tchncs.deN This user is from outside of this forum
                                        [email protected]
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #91

                                        These people from the Silicon Valley see themselves as the saviours of mankind (look up Longtermism in Silicon Valley). Within their structure of believe anything is within reason as long as it serves the greater good. That includes anything from obviously breaking the law to outright genocide, which we see in action right now.

                                        Of course since their moral code is already eroded to its core there are no boundaries, like "I shouldn't molest other people"…

                                        U 1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • K [email protected]

                                          So was it trained on his work without his approval?

                                          ? Offline
                                          ? Offline
                                          Guest
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #92

                                          Pretty much all AI ”art” is.

                                          Its been years already and legal wild west regarding it still has not been cleared, I’d bet because techbro fuckers lobbying.

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups