Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

agnos.is Forums

  1. Home
  2. Android
  3. [GSMArena] Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge review

[GSMArena] Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge review

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Android
6 Posts 4 Posters 2 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • blaze@piefed.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
    blaze@piefed.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
    [email protected]
    wrote on last edited by [email protected]
    #1
    This post did not contain any content.
    E 1 Reply Last reply
    21
    • blaze@piefed.socialB [email protected]
      This post did not contain any content.
      E This user is from outside of this forum
      E This user is from outside of this forum
      [email protected]
      wrote on last edited by
      #2

      I don't get it. 3900mAh battery and 25 charging is not okay for a flagship costing over 1 lakh. If the aim is to make a light phone, why not use a weaker SoC and make it cheaper as well? This is neither here nor there. Who even is the target audience?

      blaze@piefed.socialB I 2 Replies Last reply
      3
      • E [email protected]

        I don't get it. 3900mAh battery and 25 charging is not okay for a flagship costing over 1 lakh. If the aim is to make a light phone, why not use a weaker SoC and make it cheaper as well? This is neither here nor there. Who even is the target audience?

        blaze@piefed.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
        blaze@piefed.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
        [email protected]
        wrote on last edited by
        #3

        I'm a bit confused as well. Maybe for people who like the S25+ but want it lighter?

        C 1 Reply Last reply
        2
        • blaze@piefed.socialB [email protected]

          I'm a bit confused as well. Maybe for people who like the S25+ but want it lighter?

          C This user is from outside of this forum
          C This user is from outside of this forum
          [email protected]
          wrote on last edited by [email protected]
          #4

          I think its more like a concept of 'look what we can do' than a good value consumer product.

          I 1 Reply Last reply
          3
          • E [email protected]

            I don't get it. 3900mAh battery and 25 charging is not okay for a flagship costing over 1 lakh. If the aim is to make a light phone, why not use a weaker SoC and make it cheaper as well? This is neither here nor there. Who even is the target audience?

            I This user is from outside of this forum
            I This user is from outside of this forum
            [email protected]
            wrote on last edited by [email protected]
            #5

            It's a first-gen product, most of them tend to be "okay but who is going to buy this?" type things. I guess they will better figure that out as they iterate (unless it gets discontinued). We have been approaching a true bezel-less design for a while now so it was only a matter of time before companies started on making phones thinner. Apple is also reportedly working on one, which is probably why Samsung's feels a bit rushed (they wanted to be first).

            1 Reply Last reply
            1
            • C [email protected]

              I think its more like a concept of 'look what we can do' than a good value consumer product.

              I This user is from outside of this forum
              I This user is from outside of this forum
              [email protected]
              wrote on last edited by
              #6

              The boring/limited colour options suggest that might be the case too.

              1 Reply Last reply
              1
              Reply
              • Reply as topic
              Log in to reply
              • Oldest to Newest
              • Newest to Oldest
              • Most Votes


              • Login

              • Login or register to search.
              • First post
                Last post
              0
              • Categories
              • Recent
              • Tags
              • Popular
              • World
              • Users
              • Groups