Elon Musk and Taylor Swift can now hide details of their private jets/// Private aircraft owners can now ask the FAA to keep their registration information out of the public eye.
-
You have to go at it the other way, now:
As someone of modest means, I fully support and endorse giving billoinaires more money. After all, if they don't have money, then what will trickle down to me?
Wait no that's still not funny at all.
i call it trickle up, or reverse pyramid.
-
Elon now can more easily buy his specialK, lol
all that premium cocaine from columbia.
-
Anyone who isn’t rich in America can go fuck yourself is what they’ve been saying for a while in words and actions
millionaires are way above middle class, middle class is usually around depending on area, is 50k-100k.year. millionaires are way above that.
-
millionaires are way above middle class, middle class is usually around depending on area, is 50k-100k.year. millionaires are way above that.
You're missing their point, they're saying from the point of view of those in power millionaires are middle class.
Although there are some that distinguish a "managerial class" that is in-between the middle class and the billionaires : people like CEOs and such, with net worth in the tens of millions but who are not those who benefit the most from the system and are culturally distinct. I think it's a useful concept personally, as their interests aren't necessarily the same as the owner class but they still have a lot of political power.
-
This post did not contain any content.
-
And then when their anonymous airplanes crashed into each other, the world felt conflicted about it.
Oh no that would be so sad. Please no.
-
Just like with the cars.
You can find out anything as well with the license plates.
-
Why would you want to hide that information? As long as planes use public skies everyone should be identified. Thats like the very basics of every secure operation.
Absolutely air traffic in the sky should be identified. There is no problem with that, but it's the idea that it is too easy to find out everything about an aircraft owner by simply seeing the number on their tail.
The rich guys obfuscate that info with shell corps to own the aircraft.
Shouldn't everyone have the right to the same level of privacy regardless of how much money they have?
-
Absolutely air traffic in the sky should be identified. There is no problem with that, but it's the idea that it is too easy to find out everything about an aircraft owner by simply seeing the number on their tail.
The rich guys obfuscate that info with shell corps to own the aircraft.
Shouldn't everyone have the right to the same level of privacy regardless of how much money they have?
Maybe the rich guys shouldn't be able to it instead and thats what should change?
-
And then when their anonymous airplanes crashed into each other, the world felt conflicted about it.
-
Wait! Think about the children! What if we need to track pedophiles!?
The pedophiles are in power, except "real pedophilia is when the gays do it".
-
This post did not contain any content.
-
This post did not contain any content.
Luckily the FAA has no power in europe
-
This post did not contain any content.
Well then...
As a #SovereignCitizen, I will not comply with FAA drone laws
Bonus points: Y'all can use an app called Rattlegram to convert a sting of text into audio that can be played over amateur radio. And if you encrypt the text beforehand using encryption tools such as Secure Space Encryptor (known as Paranoia Text Encryption on iOS), or Open PGP (both are open source), before pasting the ciphertext into Rattlegram (also open source), you have encrypted off-grid communications.
This is #Murica! The president can ignore laws. So can we.
-
System shared this topic
