Protection
-
This post did not contain any content.
The mesh is just about the size of the wifi wage length
-
This post did not contain any content.
Yeah boss the RSSI numbers look great!
-
"I see the problem, your AP is in the Faraday Chasity Cage. Closing ticket."
Putting my horny robots in the faraday chastity cage
-
If it's higher than eye-level, they don't need a cage for it at all. It's not even locked, just use any old Phillips screwdriver to remove the 4 screws!
Why would it be locked????
-
Probably not for a MIMO AP. The whole idea is that you solve the equations to optimize in the presence of multipath. It's legit wizard shit but it's the reason why your cell phone works in a parking garage, because the optimal channel is bouncing off the ventilation shaft. For any reasonably modern AP, it should work the same way. This might hurt a bit but not that much.
MIMO will solve lensing issues but not internal reflection or absorbance.
So like OP says, it’s a signal strength issue.
-
I'm just impressed they labelled the WAP.
Get a bucket and a mop for that wireless access point
-
Get a bucket and a mop for that wireless access point
*Wet Access Point.
-
That's just an AP. That's not a directional antenna for a wireless bridge. You can even read the AP sticker on it.
Yeah, It looks like a Cisco Aironet 2702i WAP.
-
This post did not contain any content.
Remember when some jokers started selling Faraday cages for Wi-Fi routers on Amazon, claiming that it would protect the user from wireless signals?
-
The cage is to protect it from flying balls.
Oh, that makes sense. Forgot it was in the gym...
-
Remember when some jokers started selling Faraday cages for Wi-Fi routers on Amazon, claiming that it would protect the user from wireless signals?
well i mean they're not lying
-
This is a 2.4 GHz directional WiFi antenna. Only the back element is connected to the transceiver. All of the other elements are there to focus the signal. Anything metallic within a few feet of an antenna will have a substantial effect on the signal. Think of it as light, because it is, only transparency of materials is a bit weird. The biggest issues will come from metallic materials that are earth grounded and anything with a wire length that is close to the wavelength of the radio light or below, especially around half and a quarter of the wavelength. That pictured wire pitch is spaced very close to the approximate 2.4 GHz wave length. For example most antenna are an insulated trace on a circuit board that is insulated with ground up to a point and then there is a small circuit element that stops the ground and the actual antenna trace continues for the respective light wavelength to transmit or receive. All an antenna is here is an exposed length of single conductor wire.
Even if this was right, which it isn't, wifi stopped being 2.4Ghz exclusive almost 20 years ago. You have 5Ghz and since 5 year ago or so, 6Ghz, with significantly shorter wavelengths.
-
Newer standards are substantially shorter at 5GHz and 6GHz, but this comes at the cost of significantly worse signal penetration through walls.
Which in a gym will be will be fine.
-
Even if this was right, which it isn't, wifi stopped being 2.4Ghz exclusive almost 20 years ago. You have 5Ghz and since 5 year ago or so, 6Ghz, with significantly shorter wavelengths.
wrote on last edited by [email protected]And if I look at the frequency spectrum I see that all my neighbours use 2.4GHz (9 are in channel
and I got the entire 5GHz spectrum to myself. -
I think they were trying to say that the cage in front with the AP behind, acts as a directional antenna. Similar to how Yagi antennas have metal elements that aren't connected in front of the actual antenna.
But I don't know enough antenna theory to know if that's correct.
It'll more likely act as a faraday cage.
-
And if I look at the frequency spectrum I see that all my neighbours use 2.4GHz (9 are in channel
and I got the entire 5GHz spectrum to myself.Channel 8? I thought modern routers automatically select 1 6 and 11. That must be some ancient equipment around.
-
Channel 8? I thought modern routers automatically select 1 6 and 11. That must be some ancient equipment around.
Probably because for most people as long as it works it works and there's no reason to upgrade.
-
Probably because for most people as long as it works it works and there's no reason to upgrade.
Sorry, but 9 networks on channel 8 can hardly be described as something "working". I'd bet you barely get a 1mbps on that, and a crazy jitter and packet loss.
-
Doesn't look grounded, though.
It is probably more of a reflector rather than blocker, sending the signal back through the wall
