Your post was about a friend who's "transracial" (your term), not trans in the sense that they identify as a different gender than the one they were assigned at birth.
-
wrote on last edited by [email protected]
Your post was about a friend who's "transracial" (your term), not trans in the sense that they identify as a different gender than the one they were assigned at birth. Plus, you use the term "trans" to refer to that identity like it's a universally-accepted conclusion and just as accepted as the other use of trans. You also insult those who don't agree with this, call them transphobic, and accuse anyone who disagrees of brigading (with no evidence). While not personally included in either group, my understanding is that this point of view is very controversial and could be considered offensive to people from one, both, or neither community. Again, no opinion on the content, but I believe that's part of why it didn't resonate with people reading it.
TLDR: It's controversial because it's controversial.