I was just wondering to myself how long the West intended to just eat Russia's shit when it comes to this constant disinformation undermining the integrity of their states before they would stop playing by the rules even the tiniest little bit.
-
I was just wondering to myself how long the West intended to just eat Russia's shit when it comes to this constant disinformation undermining the integrity of their states before they would stop playing by the rules even the tiniest little bit. Unless every single Western leader is compromised it just didn't make sense - and that level of compromise just didn't seem likely. Maybe this is it.
-
I was just wondering to myself how long the West intended to just eat Russia's shit when it comes to this constant disinformation undermining the integrity of their states before they would stop playing by the rules even the tiniest little bit. Unless every single Western leader is compromised it just didn't make sense - and that level of compromise just didn't seem likely. Maybe this is it.
I think it's more about keeping Putler away from the nuke button. The West can easily take Russia. But Putler is an evil man who might prefer a burning world over defeat.
-
I think it's more about keeping Putler away from the nuke button. The West can easily take Russia. But Putler is an evil man who might prefer a burning world over defeat.
Winning a nuclear war is unfortunately still losing
-
I think it's more about keeping Putler away from the nuke button. The West can easily take Russia. But Putler is an evil man who might prefer a burning world over defeat.
wrote on last edited by [email protected]Xi has actually been the one slapping Putin's wrist whenever the Russian dictator makes threats with nukes, even if the threats are empty. With three years of empty repetitive threats and Xi leashing Putin about it, this may have emboldened the West to finally allow Ukraine deep strikes and thinking to themselves "aww..the dog is all bark after all."
Although on the one hand, some countries are still reliant on Russian gas and oil imports and receive them in stealthy ways. So the other motivation is not just fear of nukes, but also the possibility of economic paralysis if oil and gas supplies are affected.
-
Winning a nuclear war is unfortunately still losing
Exactly.
-
Winning a nuclear war is unfortunately still losing
wrote on last edited by [email protected]A STRANGE GAME. THE ONLY WINNING MOVE IS NOT TO PLAY.. ... HOW ABOUT A NICE GAME OF CHESS? -
I think it's more about keeping Putler away from the nuke button. The West can easily take Russia. But Putler is an evil man who might prefer a burning world over defeat.
Yes, their "what's the point of having a world if Russia isn't in it" proves how insane they are.
-
Xi has actually been the one slapping Putin's wrist whenever the Russian dictator makes threats with nukes, even if the threats are empty. With three years of empty repetitive threats and Xi leashing Putin about it, this may have emboldened the West to finally allow Ukraine deep strikes and thinking to themselves "aww..the dog is all bark after all."
Although on the one hand, some countries are still reliant on Russian gas and oil imports and receive them in stealthy ways. So the other motivation is not just fear of nukes, but also the possibility of economic paralysis if oil and gas supplies are affected.
A kind of terrifying thought Ive had, what if theyre waiting for russia to go 'all in' so that it can be attacked, stopped and occupied for profit.
