Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

agnos.is Forums

  1. Home
  2. Linux
  3. Must fight temptation to buy an overpriced raspberry pi

Must fight temptation to buy an overpriced raspberry pi

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Linux
linux
266 Posts 144 Posters 2 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • A [email protected]

    Yes actually still sounds good. Raspberry Pis actually have quite high power draw compared to the performance they give. Like sure the number might be smallish but the performance they give and functionality they have is awful compared to even a mini PC which use similar power. Mini PCs btw are actually one of the best options in performance per watt and can still be cheap, plus they have upgradable RAM and storage. A Mac mini is more expensive but will thrash everything else in efficiency and performance per watt, although non-upgradable. Even slightly older laptops will only draw tens of watts when fully charged, vs a desktop or proper server that could pull 100W even at idle in some cases. Older laptops tended to be more upgradable too.

    C This user is from outside of this forum
    C This user is from outside of this forum
    [email protected]
    wrote last edited by
    #196

    Please be specific rather than referring to 'raspberry pis' together. Different models have way different characteristics.

    A 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • C [email protected]

      Please be specific rather than referring to 'raspberry pis' together. Different models have way different characteristics.

      A This user is from outside of this forum
      A This user is from outside of this forum
      [email protected]
      wrote last edited by
      #197

      Are any of them actually that good in efficiency though? Like a Pi 5 is probably the best in performance per watt, but it also has the highest power consumption. Realistically you wouldn't self host on anything older than a Pi 4 anyway.

      C 1 Reply Last reply
      1
      • R [email protected]

        Do you mean the steam deck?

        Z This user is from outside of this forum
        Z This user is from outside of this forum
        [email protected]
        wrote last edited by
        #198

        Deck is slightly bigger than Gameboy

        1 Reply Last reply
        2
        • A [email protected]

          Pi's are ARM-based, which still to this day limits the scope of their applicability.

          Also, you should absolutely inspect a laptop before buying. Many, if not most, of old laptops will run just fine for the next few years.

          C This user is from outside of this forum
          C This user is from outside of this forum
          [email protected]
          wrote last edited by
          #199

          Pi’s are ARM-based, which still to this day limits the scope of their applicability.

          Untrue.

          Also, you should absolutely inspect a laptop before buying. Many, if not most, of old laptops will run just fine for the next few years.

          Until the battery needs replacing, costing more than a pi, one key on the keyboard dies, etc.

          A 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • K [email protected]

            I picked up a used 2018 Fujitsu office PC with an i5-7500 for $60 (from a physical recycle shop, with a 14 day warranty) and it draws 15W idle. Way better value than a Pi (once you've added case, cooling, PSU etc) for running home server stuff.

            A Pi still kills for "Arduino plus plus" use cases where you need the size, GPIO or can optimize the heck out of power usage on a battery.

            C This user is from outside of this forum
            C This user is from outside of this forum
            [email protected]
            wrote last edited by [email protected]
            #200

            It's even worth pointing out you can disable various parts of the pi so it uses / needs even less juice.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • crmsnbleyd@sopuli.xyzC [email protected]

              original post: https://mk.moth.zone/notes/a8zer7ypj6uv02ka

              C This user is from outside of this forum
              C This user is from outside of this forum
              [email protected]
              wrote last edited by
              #201

              I'm sure silicon valley are stepping on each other, vying to get their hands on these super cheap laptops for their 24/7 AI training.

              A ulrich@feddit.orgU 2 Replies Last reply
              7
              • L [email protected]

                Nah no way does the average ewaste tier laptop use less power than a raspberry pi for any given task. The power consumption floor for a laptop may be lower than the rpi ceiling but that's not a fair comparison

                A This user is from outside of this forum
                A This user is from outside of this forum
                [email protected]
                wrote last edited by
                #202

                Benchmark it and tell me. The truth is that most RPis are made using older process nodes to reduce costs. Laptops are often made using the best avaliable process node and core design. A modern raspberry pi 5 uses a 16nm processor with Cortex-A76 design from 2018. A laptop in 2015 would be using 14nm Broadwell processors from Intel. This was a time when 15W U series processors were gaining popularity, so sustained load power consumption is quite low. A 2015 laptop is 10 years old, and wouldn't run Windows 11, so will be ewaste this year. Same with a lot of 8 year old machines actually.

                1 Reply Last reply
                2
                • jjlinux@lemmy.mlJ [email protected]

                  Yeah, but this is about self hosting and it's costs, so the comparison is relevant.

                  A This user is from outside of this forum
                  A This user is from outside of this forum
                  [email protected]
                  wrote last edited by
                  #203

                  Yes it's relevant. I have been one of the people making it. However they didn't specificy what they were actually comparing in their first comment. So it ends up they are saying something false. Your average laptop could easily beat a raspberry pi in performance per watt.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • R [email protected]

                    I would assume that landfill laptop manufacturers are trying to minimize costs even harder on the charger.

                    but what timeframe do you mean with "anymore"? laptops made in this decade, or the last 10 years, or something else? there's plenty of old laptops that fitinto OPs category.

                    A This user is from outside of this forum
                    A This user is from outside of this forum
                    [email protected]
                    wrote last edited by
                    #204

                    Probably for as long as raspberry pis have been around. There have been plenty of scares with phone chargers exploding, and that's what a raspberry pi is powered from. Laptop chargers haven't had many issues in the past decade or so.

                    R 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • crmsnbleyd@sopuli.xyzC [email protected]

                      original post: https://mk.moth.zone/notes/a8zer7ypj6uv02ka

                      ulrich@feddit.orgU This user is from outside of this forum
                      ulrich@feddit.orgU This user is from outside of this forum
                      [email protected]
                      wrote last edited by [email protected]
                      #205

                      A RPi is going to be smaller, quieter, and 10x more energy efficient though...

                      H 1 Reply Last reply
                      29
                      • crmsnbleyd@sopuli.xyzC [email protected]

                        original post: https://mk.moth.zone/notes/a8zer7ypj6uv02ka

                        G This user is from outside of this forum
                        G This user is from outside of this forum
                        [email protected]
                        wrote last edited by [email protected]
                        #206

                        I had the accounting self hosted web app on it until I was too lazy for accounting and now I am in so called hot water and must make bunch of shit up using mathematical apparatus

                        But it worked really well for a year or so

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • C [email protected]

                          I'm sure silicon valley are stepping on each other, vying to get their hands on these super cheap laptops for their 24/7 AI training.

                          A This user is from outside of this forum
                          A This user is from outside of this forum
                          [email protected]
                          wrote last edited by
                          #207

                          They aren't very useful for much besides hobby projects. Modern hardware is more energy efficient and will be cheaper in the long run compared to anything that would be considered e-waste. The only advantage an old laptop has is the initial cost, so it makes sense for a small home server.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          1
                          • A [email protected]

                            Are any of them actually that good in efficiency though? Like a Pi 5 is probably the best in performance per watt, but it also has the highest power consumption. Realistically you wouldn't self host on anything older than a Pi 4 anyway.

                            C This user is from outside of this forum
                            C This user is from outside of this forum
                            [email protected]
                            wrote last edited by
                            #208

                            I can self host what I want on a pi zero. But, I do have some 30 years of experience so can probably do things some won't understand / bother with.

                            A 1 Reply Last reply
                            1
                            • jackbydev@programming.devJ [email protected]

                              Also, Raspberry Pi first got popular because of the size and cost. Now it's popular because it's popular. Not hating on them, I think they're cool, but they're not cheap any more. Especially with the scalping.

                              Getting x86_64 based systems is going to mean much less headache. Unless you truly truly need the size I wouldn't consider getting a Pi or other SBC. Just go to literally any used marketplace (Facebook, Craigslist, etc) and get anything.

                              A This user is from outside of this forum
                              A This user is from outside of this forum
                              [email protected]
                              wrote last edited by
                              #209

                              That's only true for the high-end Pi 5. Lower-powered models like the zero 2 are still cheap, and they're a lot easier to find than a few years ago.

                              jackbydev@programming.devJ 1 Reply Last reply
                              4
                              • A [email protected]

                                That's only true for the high-end Pi 5. Lower-powered models like the zero 2 are still cheap, and they're a lot easier to find than a few years ago.

                                jackbydev@programming.devJ This user is from outside of this forum
                                jackbydev@programming.devJ This user is from outside of this forum
                                [email protected]
                                wrote last edited by
                                #210

                                Which part? Because the "it's not x86" is even more annoying to deal with on Pi Zero lol.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                2
                                • C [email protected]

                                  I can self host what I want on a pi zero. But, I do have some 30 years of experience so can probably do things some won't understand / bother with.

                                  A This user is from outside of this forum
                                  A This user is from outside of this forum
                                  [email protected]
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #211

                                  Bro please. I understand you can host very small stuff on less powerful Pis. I used to host some stuff on a Raspberry Pi model b myself. Stop tooting your own horn. You couldn't however host all the stuff I use or even most home labbers use on a Pi zero with modern software. I doubt it could run Jellyfin, an *arr stack, ollama, nextcloud, etc all at the same time. Probably you would also have to drop using containers which would be less secure and easy to deploy.

                                  What's the performance per watt of a Pi Zero anyway? I am sure it's low power draw but I doubt it's actually efficient.

                                  C 1 Reply Last reply
                                  1
                                  • C [email protected]

                                    I'm sure silicon valley are stepping on each other, vying to get their hands on these super cheap laptops for their 24/7 AI training.

                                    ulrich@feddit.orgU This user is from outside of this forum
                                    ulrich@feddit.orgU This user is from outside of this forum
                                    [email protected]
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #212

                                    No Silicon Valley are the ones throwing these things away because it costs them too much money to deal with old unreliable PCs.

                                    C 1 Reply Last reply
                                    2
                                    • B [email protected]

                                      If you have the lid closed, you're looking at 3 to 15 watts to have a laptop running in the background doing some basic server shit.

                                      Maybe a little more under high load, but those are going to be intermittent and not constant.

                                      I'm just saying it's not that much more electricity usage, and the recycling more than offsets the CO2.

                                      I This user is from outside of this forum
                                      I This user is from outside of this forum
                                      [email protected]
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #213

                                      Not quite. Unless the system has pretty advanced power management and is using very recent technology with high density, it's unlikely that an x64 chipset will use less power than a comparably powered arm64 chipset. Not just the processor, but the smaller board is actually a power saver and allows it to generate less heat meaning both less power wasted and dissipated as heat as well as less power needed for fans to properly dissipate the heat. I've never seen a laptop use 3W at idle when considering the whole device, maybe just the CPU, but not if you include the rest of the components like RAM and disks and power supply. And especially true in a laptop that is old enough that it's being recycled. Heck, the power supply and charger alone might be using 3W at idle with full battery.

                                      With a raspberry pi 4, the typical power usage for the 2GB RAM model is 5W under load for the whole device and about half that for idle. Add a couple of watts for the extra memory and wider bus on the 8GB model and other things can add to that, but that's mostly accurate. The pi 5 is a little more and the 3 is a little less. Of course, the efficiency of the laptop at full load might end up being better than a comparable number of raspberry pis it would take to do the same amount if work, but comparing a single pi or any other reputable arm-based, single board computer to a single laptop at idle is always going to be that way.

                                      A 1 Reply Last reply
                                      1
                                      • crmsnbleyd@sopuli.xyzC [email protected]

                                        original post: https://mk.moth.zone/notes/a8zer7ypj6uv02ka

                                        I This user is from outside of this forum
                                        I This user is from outside of this forum
                                        [email protected]
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #214

                                        Only if you're running it at full load all the time and comparing that to a comparable number of raspberry pis it would take to do the same amount of work. Also, only if you live in a cold climate and the heat generated is not a concern and power is supplied by a renewable source so power isn't a concern.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        7
                                        • chaoticentropy@feddit.ukC [email protected]

                                          I guess I am pretty far from saturating my WiFi in any way, the removal of cables with little to no impact on connectivity was far more of a priority for me. I have never noticed a WiFi related outage or performance loss.

                                          M This user is from outside of this forum
                                          M This user is from outside of this forum
                                          [email protected]
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #215

                                          My WiFi routers have historically struggled a bit, I've got a decent one now, but even it is slow to manage the DHCP lists for fixed assignments by MAC address.

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups