Oh hell yeah
-
A single voice actor couldn't produce enough lines to fully train an AI model...
The model is trained on a massive corpus of existing data and then fine tuned to match the target voice actor. Using less than ~30s of reference audio you can get a pretty decent fine tuning the main issue is that it currently isn't on par with the quality and consistency of an in studio voice actor, especially over long time domains.
Hence my usage of the words "fully train". The other commentor wants to license every piece of audio used in training the model which obviously includes the base model...
-
AI deepfakes are all over the place right now. Or did you think the video of Trump being a rock star was real?
wrote on last edited by [email protected]Ok? And what does this have to do with anything I wrote?
Edit: Oh, I get it. You misread the first paragraph and completely ignored the second which made you completely miss the point of my comment.
I'm not saying that you can't specialize AI to sound like a specific actor. I'm saying that you can't train a new AI model using only recordings of a single actor.
-
Ok? And what does this have to do with anything I wrote?
Edit: Oh, I get it. You misread the first paragraph and completely ignored the second which made you completely miss the point of my comment.
I'm not saying that you can't specialize AI to sound like a specific actor. I'm saying that you can't train a new AI model using only recordings of a single actor.
You can license the output of a likeness powered by AI.
-
Aren't they doing this already? Seriously have any of you been on facebook. It's full of that crap.
But that’s all bots generating clickbait right?
-
Hence my usage of the words "fully train". The other commentor wants to license every piece of audio used in training the model which obviously includes the base model...
You can feed an infinite amount of data into existing models and it won't improve the issues. The problem is with the models themselves.
And the audio used to train the base model are licensed. Usually under an MIT, creative commons, etc. license.
-
Machine Learning has revolutionized protein folding and plenty of other sciences.
I actually work in the field of protein crystallography. Contrary to newspaper reporting by people who don't understand the field and just repeat what the people who developed the tool say about it, it has made just a small improvement to analysing experimental data which we could have easily made using traditional algorithmic approaches with a similar amount of resources spent. And this is one of its biggest legitimate impacts - it absolutely hasn't "revolutionised plenty of other sciences", or you'd be able to list more things than just alphafold.
It doesn't improve programmer productivity, it increases the lines of code created, which is a really bad metric for productivity. There is good evidence that its use is already leading to increased code churn, that means someone is having to go back and revisit the additional new errors introduced by AI tools, which is obviously less productive.
So what you are saying is that AI is actually useful since it has improved analyzing experimental data.
Thanks for proving my point.
-
"Potato!"
Or something. IDK, I haven't watched the movies...
I remember finding it funny and endearing when I first watched it. And then it just... never... stopped...
-
This post did not contain any content.
Copyright lawsuit incoming
-
It’s actually working, many people around me that were enthusiastic about AI are now pissed off by it thanks to all that shit.
wrote on last edited by [email protected]So if bots flood db0 with terrible AI generated spam, then the db0 admins will stop being weird about AI?
... I'm not asking for any particular reason
-
Fucking hell
-
So if bots flood db0 with terrible AI generated spam, then the db0 admins will stop being weird about AI?
... I'm not asking for any particular reason
spam is spam. We'll deal with it like any other spam.
-
spam is spam. We'll deal with it like any other spam.
I think all AI art is spam
-
I am only critical that those models are in the hand of corporations who try to profit from it. Copyrights are mainly a tool to be wielded by the powerful: see Sony trying to disconnect ISP accounts en masse or media giants suing people into oblivion, Nintendo fucking over their fanbase again and again and so on.
The datasets should belong to an UN organisation like UNESCO, corporations/NGOs/people should be able to licence them to build their models (ev. with "community models" provided free for personal use), and the licence fees should be used to subsidize culture. This plus an UBI would make sure that artists don't have to starve, corporations can use them to try to make a profit, and everyone else can use them to create for their own or their communities use. Artists that don't want to go into the datasets have that right too, but also won't have access to that financial pool (this shouldn't be the only pool).
Fuck copyrights.
Under capitalism, copyrights are a necessary tool for people to get paid for their labour in some cases. That's not the most common usecase for copyrights, but a needed one until we get a better system. Fuck copyrights being used for corporate greed though. Somehow, more people are against the former than the latter, which is super wrong. But it's not a reason to be against the former in addition to being against the latter.
-
Aren't they doing this already? Seriously have any of you been on facebook. It's full of that crap.
Exactly! The 'death' of facebook has in no way seemed to impact its influence on everything. I still find places that use a facebook page as their company website. The marketplace is inescapable if you want to buy or sell something used.
All this idea would do is establish a very well known area for AI to be used in... and it would serve the same function as a reservoir of infection for pathogens.
-
Exactly! The 'death' of facebook has in no way seemed to impact its influence on everything. I still find places that use a facebook page as their company website. The marketplace is inescapable if you want to buy or sell something used.
All this idea would do is establish a very well known area for AI to be used in... and it would serve the same function as a reservoir of infection for pathogens.
Or even local municipalities publishing important adivice.
/hey did you know that they have to cut the water supply to work on these leaking pipes?
/no
/why not we put it on facebook
/...No i don't have facebook, O just wish people who used it understood this little fact of life. But no. They rely on facebook for local communication, essentially cutting out anyone else.
-
Ok? And what does this have to do with anything I wrote?
Edit: Oh, I get it. You misread the first paragraph and completely ignored the second which made you completely miss the point of my comment.
I'm not saying that you can't specialize AI to sound like a specific actor. I'm saying that you can't train a new AI model using only recordings of a single actor.
wrote on last edited by [email protected]You can record a few seconds of dialogue and get convincing results. I’m sure at a professional level, you could do it with a few minutes at most.
(Side note, I don’t endorse or recommend the site I linked to. Only using it to demonstrate the point. I don’t recommend you surrender the sound of your voice to these guys.)
-
Or even local municipalities publishing important adivice.
/hey did you know that they have to cut the water supply to work on these leaking pipes?
/no
/why not we put it on facebook
/...No i don't have facebook, O just wish people who used it understood this little fact of life. But no. They rely on facebook for local communication, essentially cutting out anyone else.
That one freaking kills me. I can only hope that the movement of some places onto mastodon might help be a gentle push and a guide that can be pointed to for other places to follow.
-
I am only critical that those models are in the hand of corporations who try to profit from it. Copyrights are mainly a tool to be wielded by the powerful: see Sony trying to disconnect ISP accounts en masse or media giants suing people into oblivion, Nintendo fucking over their fanbase again and again and so on.
The datasets should belong to an UN organisation like UNESCO, corporations/NGOs/people should be able to licence them to build their models (ev. with "community models" provided free for personal use), and the licence fees should be used to subsidize culture. This plus an UBI would make sure that artists don't have to starve, corporations can use them to try to make a profit, and everyone else can use them to create for their own or their communities use. Artists that don't want to go into the datasets have that right too, but also won't have access to that financial pool (this shouldn't be the only pool).
Fuck copyrights.
If we just got rid of copyright, we would just see Disney flipping other people's work without credit, just like how genAI grifters try to use it currently.
-
This post did not contain any content.wrote on last edited by [email protected]
I dont know why it upsets people. Maybe accept that it exists in the world and it only mimics real human creativity.
If there was a fish that could mimic and recreate human art would you be mad at the fish?
-
I remember finding it funny and endearing when I first watched it. And then it just... never... stopped...
wrote on last edited by [email protected]I think that was every normal person's experience with minions. They were funny as side characters in the film, but then the sequels and spinoffs leaned too heavily into them and the memes started and everyone with 2 braincells to rub together said "fuck this" and ignored the minion scurge to fester
