Mozilla is already revising its new Firefox terms to clarify how it handles user data
-
I found something but it is for chrome. https://github.com/Xodarap/Paranoid-Browsing
-
Do you have a source for that? I can't seem to find anything on their website, though judging by the past few release notes you're absolutely right.
Edit: found this video. Kinda feel like this should be a big red banner on the front page though.
-
It lets developers target what to improve and fix instead of going in blind.
I'm sure they'll make do
-
. Software developers rely on and need data, you can't guess what people want.
Why would I want software developers (particularly we've browser) to guess what I want? I will tell them what I want, otherwise they have no business serving it to me.
-
How convenient for you.
-
Is it? It seems to be maintained by a user named relan based out of Russia. It's just a few scripts to build it for F-Droid and basically just removes some proprietary stuff. It's not a fork, just a build script.
-
I will tell them what I want
You might, but 99% of users will never take a step towards giving any feedback whatsoever.
-
Yes, which means they don't want anything from them. Rather than seeing those people as nothing more than potential profit, just move on.
-
Yeah, that video was what I was referencing
-
Yes, which means they don't want anything from them.
And yet they're using the application. Don't you want the applications that you use to work better? This is what telemetry enables, the ability to give feedback without jumping through 10 hoops, creating an account, responding to a survey, or whatever other method you're thinking of to give feedback.
-
I'm not going to enumerate them, mostly because I did not keep track of which one was on and which one was off before messing all of them up.
If you're curious, open "about:config" and search for "survey*.enabled", "collect*.enabled". Even with all settings disabled, some of them remains on, and they do cause traffic to the (documented) endpoints. -
The drama isn't exactly their fault. There are a lot of rich organizations that want them to cease to exist. Most 9f which want track you online and/or shove ads down your throat.
-
A fair amount of drama is exactly their fault. Mozilla chose to increase management pay and fire people, Mozilla chose to flirt with ai, Mozilla bought an ad firm, and so on. It's not like someone was holding a knife to their throat.
-
Neil doesn't need a chatbot with sparkles for that, he's plenty capable to take absolute piss himself.
-
I agree, I don't want my browser provider to collect any data on me at all, but if they absolutely must gather the absolute minimum system analytics stats or such they should NEVER pass it to a third party for ANY reason.
You make a desktop browser application, that's your job, to provide a portal to the world wide web, nothing more. Stay within your bounds and we'll never have any problem.
-
While they have to be careful, there can be reasonable ones to help what they do/stop doing.
Example, "x% of telemetry enabled users enable the bookmark bar", not particularly useful for harmful purposes, but if it were 0.00%, then they know efforts accommodating the bookmark bar would be pointless. Not many users would go out of their way to say "I don't use some feature I'm ignoring", and telemetry is able to convey that data, so the developer is not guessing based on his preference.
That being said, the telemetry is so opaque that it's hard to make an informed decision as to whether the telemetry in question is risky or not. Might be good to have some sort of accumulated telemetry data that you can click to review and submit, and have that data be actually human readable and to the point for salient points.
-
Tor. Anything short is freely giving your data away. If you're looking for something that isn't based on Gecko or Chromium there is the DuckDuckGo browser, which is WebKit. I can't attest to their privacy practices though
