Too soon?
-
I refuse to care about the death of a man who didn’t care when children were gunned down
I will be downvoted to oblivion, but I think the contrary of “not to care” is not “not to care about others”, it's “to care”. This asshole didn't believe in empathy; let's answer with empathy.
(But I do love dark humour, that's something else.)
-
I will be downvoted to oblivion, but I think the contrary of “not to care” is not “not to care about others”, it's “to care”. This asshole didn't believe in empathy; let's answer with empathy.
(But I do love dark humour, that's something else.)
I think that the most sensible response would be just ignoring the fact. But celebrating assassination is cringe. I'm not talking about black humor, that's something else.
-
I will be downvoted to oblivion, but I think the contrary of “not to care” is not “not to care about others”, it's “to care”. This asshole didn't believe in empathy; let's answer with empathy.
(But I do love dark humour, that's something else.)
He said children should watch executions.
His family was at the event, so its great to see a right-wing influencer practicing what they preach.
-
So, why didn't you do it yourself sooner? What were you waiting for?
Jog on, troll.
-
Jog on, troll.
What an idiot. Sometimes I wonder how people like you are able to breath without shitting themselves in the meantime.
-
This post did not contain any content.
Different guy you fool.
-
Unfortunately because of the nature of death he'll never remember the bullet or dying.
But he's gone and can't brainwash anyone else.
wrote last edited by [email protected]I doubt that.
I wholly believe he is already pulling himself up by his bootstraps preaching his gun gospel in Heaven.
-
Getting brainwashed is exclusively your fault, bit the one's who is try to brainwash you.
So cringe to see Lemmy glorify assassination.
Unfitting avatar then lol
-
If Charlie Kirk were here he would tell you to shut your liberal whore mouth and respect the second amendment! Dude went out the way he wanted, with the freedom to own guns in tact
I think he would be a little more respectful than that. Plus u missed my point what do u think the right (who own a majority of guns) are going to do in response?
-
No not what I said at all. Violence in response to speech is what I said. I would recommend working on your comprehension skills.
-
spent his life fomenting hate and devaluing human life for laughs.
dies as worthlessly as he lived, in front of a screaming terrified audience who just will never understand why everyone got so crazy.
rest in skibidi, sweet prince
The right supports him. The right owns a majority of guns. I would advise against justifying political violence cos you won't win.
-
I'd recommend starting with this comment section.
-
If he was just someone with shitty opinions then I really wouldn't care. If he was just a loudmouth that said shitty things then I still wouldn't really care; then a knuckle sandwich would be enough.
It's that he has used all his privilege, time, money, and talent almost exclusively to demean, harass, and destroy innocent lives through social murder conducted by the administration he helped put into power twice.
He was a murderer up there with the likes of John Wayne Gacy, frankly with a body count orders of magnitude higher, for his Zionism alone, even if his transphobia, sexism, racism, classism, and fascism were neglected.
In the end, he deserved way the fuck worse, but I'll take what I can get.
You really do seem like a joyous person. I would advise against justifying violence in response to speech. The right supports him, the right owns most of the guns, the right make up most of the military, you may justify violence in response to speech but you won't win.
-
eat shit and take your fuckin fascist Aussie mummy back, we don't need him or his shitty fascist network.
You justify violence for speech the real fascists use it to kill you. Think before you do your enemies work for them.
-
No not what I said at all. Violence in response to speech is what I said. I would recommend working on your comprehension skills.
So you’re saying speech calling for violence is not a problem?
-
Did you change accounts? My right-wing nut tag seems to have fallen off you
Don't worry though, I've reattached it to its proper place
Saying violence for people exercising free speech is wrong gets right wing nut tag? I would say justifying murder for people exercising speech is fascist activity but what would I know?
-
I'd recommend starting with this comment section.
Fancy way of justifying violence against speech. You are the problem.
Careful there bub! Wouldn’t want you to internalize too many inconsistencies and hurt yourself!
-
I will engage with that question the second you engage with mine in good faith.
-
Don't worry u have already done the justifying for me. I'm so glad u support my plan to improve society.
-
The right supports him. The right owns a majority of guns. I would advise against justifying political violence cos you won't win.
A soybean farmer with 20 guns can at most shoot 2 at a time. And as dumb as they were to elect Trump 2, I think our chances are good
