Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

agnos.is Forums

  1. Home
  2. Technology
  3. Intel Becomes Potential Takeover Target Of Broadcom, TSMC: Reports

Intel Becomes Potential Takeover Target Of Broadcom, TSMC: Reports

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Technology
technology
16 Posts 13 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • robottoaster@mander.xyzR This user is from outside of this forum
    robottoaster@mander.xyzR This user is from outside of this forum
    [email protected]
    wrote on last edited by
    #1
    This post did not contain any content.
    486@lemmy.world4 remotelove@lemmy.caR nighed@feddit.ukN simplejack@lemmy.worldS P 6 Replies Last reply
    1
    0
    • System shared this topic on
    • robottoaster@mander.xyzR [email protected]
      This post did not contain any content.
      486@lemmy.world4 This user is from outside of this forum
      486@lemmy.world4 This user is from outside of this forum
      [email protected]
      wrote on last edited by
      #2

      Ugh, Broadcom buying Intel would be terrible.

      teamassimilation@infosec.pubT 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • robottoaster@mander.xyzR [email protected]
        This post did not contain any content.
        remotelove@lemmy.caR This user is from outside of this forum
        remotelove@lemmy.caR This user is from outside of this forum
        [email protected]
        wrote on last edited by
        #3

        If Broadcom takes over Intel, get ready for a wild ride and don't expect any kind of innovation ever again. If there ever was a backdoor in Intel CPUs, expect it to be opened up and used for licensing extortion. (That seems far fetched until you realize how fucking shady Broadcom is.)

        While I shifted to the AMD bandwagon a while ago, I really wanted Intel's GPUs to develop more over the next decade and split the market up a bit more. Sigh.

        W 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • remotelove@lemmy.caR [email protected]

          If Broadcom takes over Intel, get ready for a wild ride and don't expect any kind of innovation ever again. If there ever was a backdoor in Intel CPUs, expect it to be opened up and used for licensing extortion. (That seems far fetched until you realize how fucking shady Broadcom is.)

          While I shifted to the AMD bandwagon a while ago, I really wanted Intel's GPUs to develop more over the next decade and split the market up a bit more. Sigh.

          W This user is from outside of this forum
          W This user is from outside of this forum
          [email protected]
          wrote on last edited by
          #4

          I'm in the industry but don't know much about broadcom. What makes you say that?

          S 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • W [email protected]

            I'm in the industry but don't know much about broadcom. What makes you say that?

            S This user is from outside of this forum
            S This user is from outside of this forum
            [email protected]
            wrote on last edited by
            #5

            It's just how their past takeovers went. Like Symantec oder VMware.

            teamassimilation@infosec.pubT punkcoder@lemmy.worldP 2 Replies Last reply
            0
            • robottoaster@mander.xyzR [email protected]
              This post did not contain any content.
              nighed@feddit.ukN This user is from outside of this forum
              nighed@feddit.ukN This user is from outside of this forum
              [email protected]
              wrote on last edited by
              #6

              The cross licensing deal between AMD & Intel collapses if one gets bought out. Here is an old article that's probably still accurate that describes it. (Has some great quotes that have not aged well....)

              If that's still true, a buyout might end up killing x86/x64 in favour of arm etc.

              I also don't think trump would agree without relocating TSMCs HQ to the US or something. Competition is good anyway, we really don't want to be in a situation where there is only one fab company with anywhere near too tech.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • S [email protected]

                It's just how their past takeovers went. Like Symantec oder VMware.

                teamassimilation@infosec.pubT This user is from outside of this forum
                teamassimilation@infosec.pubT This user is from outside of this forum
                [email protected]
                wrote on last edited by
                #7

                Broadcom is a scavenger predator

                F 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • 486@lemmy.world4 [email protected]

                  Ugh, Broadcom buying Intel would be terrible.

                  teamassimilation@infosec.pubT This user is from outside of this forum
                  teamassimilation@infosec.pubT This user is from outside of this forum
                  [email protected]
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #8

                  It would be the signal that Intel is on life support, and the world can move to ARM or RISC V

                  486@lemmy.world4 embed_me@programming.devE 2 Replies Last reply
                  0
                  • teamassimilation@infosec.pubT [email protected]

                    It would be the signal that Intel is on life support, and the world can move to ARM or RISC V

                    486@lemmy.world4 This user is from outside of this forum
                    486@lemmy.world4 This user is from outside of this forum
                    [email protected]
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #9

                    There is also AMD and they are doing pretty well. I wouldn't write off x86 just yet.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • teamassimilation@infosec.pubT [email protected]

                      Broadcom is a scavenger predator

                      F This user is from outside of this forum
                      F This user is from outside of this forum
                      [email protected]
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #10

                      The scavenger predator formerly known as Avago Technologies Limited currently wears Broadcom as a skinsuit to disguise hostile takeovers as normal tech mergers.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • robottoaster@mander.xyzR [email protected]
                        This post did not contain any content.
                        simplejack@lemmy.worldS This user is from outside of this forum
                        simplejack@lemmy.worldS This user is from outside of this forum
                        [email protected]
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #11

                        ITT people are rightly pointing out that Broadcom would suck, but TSMC would also be a disaster. The world’s most critical fabs would be owned by one Taiwanese company, and building a competitor would be damn near impossible.

                        Chips from AMD, Intel, Apple, Nvidia, Qualcomm, Broadcom, etc would all come from one company. Yikes.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • S [email protected]

                          It's just how their past takeovers went. Like Symantec oder VMware.

                          punkcoder@lemmy.worldP This user is from outside of this forum
                          punkcoder@lemmy.worldP This user is from outside of this forum
                          [email protected]
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #12

                          came to the comments to say this 100%

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • robottoaster@mander.xyzR [email protected]
                            This post did not contain any content.
                            P This user is from outside of this forum
                            P This user is from outside of this forum
                            [email protected]
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #13

                            Probably just investor activists floating the idea to test the water. They've been wanting to sell Intel for parts since the bad quarter and Pat (former CEO) being evicted is part of this plan.

                            simplejack@lemmy.worldS 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • P [email protected]

                              Probably just investor activists floating the idea to test the water. They've been wanting to sell Intel for parts since the bad quarter and Pat (former CEO) being evicted is part of this plan.

                              simplejack@lemmy.worldS This user is from outside of this forum
                              simplejack@lemmy.worldS This user is from outside of this forum
                              [email protected]
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #14

                              IMHO, the old CEO kind of got a raw deal. He was right. To save intel, they need invest in fabs, not grow for a bit, and eventually separate the manufacturing and design businesses into two separate, unrelated companies. But investors want growth and money now, they don’t want to play the role of venture capital for a legacy company that needs to transform.

                              TSMC was able to advance its fabs because they have high volume from everyone that isn’t Intel. Intel’s fabs primarily make Intel stuff because they can’t get other clients. Other clients don’t manufacture with Intel because Intel’s design department can copy their homework. Intel needs to invest heavily into fabs, then split in two. If that doesn’t happen, chip manufacturing in the US is toast.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • teamassimilation@infosec.pubT [email protected]

                                It would be the signal that Intel is on life support, and the world can move to ARM or RISC V

                                embed_me@programming.devE This user is from outside of this forum
                                embed_me@programming.devE This user is from outside of this forum
                                [email protected]
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #15

                                the world can move to start to crawl towards ARM or RISC V

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • robottoaster@mander.xyzR [email protected]
                                  This post did not contain any content.
                                  C This user is from outside of this forum
                                  C This user is from outside of this forum
                                  [email protected]
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #16

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • System shared this topic on
                                  Reply
                                  • Reply as topic
                                  Log in to reply
                                  • Oldest to Newest
                                  • Newest to Oldest
                                  • Most Votes


                                  • Login

                                  • Login or register to search.
                                  • First post
                                    Last post
                                  0
                                  • Categories
                                  • Recent
                                  • Tags
                                  • Popular
                                  • World
                                  • Users
                                  • Groups