China is quietly pushing ahead with massive 50,000Mbps broadband rollout to leapfrog rest of the world on internet speeds
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
This is for PON technology. 1 fibre can be split 32-ways to feed, you guessed it, 32 customers. 50g over a fibre that is split 32-ways with a minimum of 15db loss is impressive.
I guarantee those 100gbps circuits are a single fibre all the way from the provider to the customer. And they are expensive, very expensive.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Possibly not, but if their whole company can run off 10 gigabit, who needs 50 in their house?
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
I didn't read that this was for residential connections?
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Its not that out of this world, though it is currently completely unneccessary. 10gb+ has been somewhat common residentially for years.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Most residential fiber currently is GPON with a 2 Gbps shared line using passive optical splitters, split up to 32 ways. Raising that shared line to 50 Gbps is a great upgrade.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
They're probably not building out 50 Gbps to the rice farmers
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Enterprise adopted 100GbE networking around 2019. You can now buy used network cards for around $100 each.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Probably not where I am, that seems really low. I mean it depends if you use name brand or not. Often I don't use the name brand ones
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
But someone at AT&T would have to sell their yatch
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Meanwhile, Telia in Estonia: "The Estonian customer doesn't prioritize connection speed or price, that's why we don't need to offer competitive speed/price ratios compared to what we have in other European countries"
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
That yacht is fine because someone else at AT&T rotated into a position at the FCC
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
American companies being welfare queens, imagine that.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
"Chona"
Hahah.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
I have symmetrical 10 Gbps at home ($30/mo) and I'll agree. When it's nice when you have big updates, for most households 1 Gbps is going to be just fine. As you say, the vast majority of users are bottlenecked by Wi-Fi.
The bigger crime are all the asymmetrical connections that people on technologies like Cable TV networks have, where you get 1-2 Gbps down but only something tiny like 50 Mbps up. This results in crappy video calls, makes off-site/remote backups unfeasible, etc etc.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
(or even Ethernet)
Technically, those 100+ Gbps fiber LAN/WAN connections used in data centers are also Ethernet, just not twisted pair.
That said recently I was in a retail store and saw "Cat8" cables for sale that advertised support for 40 Gbps copper ethernet! I wonder if any hardware to support that will ever be released. It is a real standard: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/100_Gigabit_Ethernet#40GBASE-T