Long lasting as fuck too
-
This post did not contain any content.
British propaganda portrayed him with his bones apart, it makes him look smaller.
-
This post did not contain any content.
Its cause the British and the French while both using feet and inches had different sizes for what an inch was. So a 5' 2" in France was closer to 5' 7" in England. But it's easier to say he is short and didn't like that.
-
This post did not contain any content.
He is such an absurd historical figure to read about, the way he could get people to rally around him and make his armies work smoothly no matter what.
It looked like he could just wash ashore naked and alone anywhere, recruit a loyal army from whomever appeared to live nearby, and snowball it into a huge professional fighting force on the way to conquer the nearest city.
-
He is such an absurd historical figure to read about, the way he could get people to rally around him and make his armies work smoothly no matter what.
It looked like he could just wash ashore naked and alone anywhere, recruit a loyal army from whomever appeared to live nearby, and snowball it into a huge professional fighting force on the way to conquer the nearest city.
Maybe he was an SCP
-
This post did not contain any content.
IIRC, the short Napoleon was his grandnephew, Napoleon III.
-
This post did not contain any content.
I don't quite get it. Apparently, Napoleon's height was ridiculed and used for english propaganda, but I often hear that actually, he wasn't a small person. I looked it up, wikipedia says he was 1.68 m. That's damn short though.
-
This post did not contain any content.
Okay, but his dick was like 2 inches long though.
-
I don't quite get it. Apparently, Napoleon's height was ridiculed and used for english propaganda, but I often hear that actually, he wasn't a small person. I looked it up, wikipedia says he was 1.68 m. That's damn short though.
Average height has increased over time.
-
Average height has increased over time.
No, not always. There were fluctuations depending on several factors, nutrition being one (and an important one).
Still, 1.68 seems just tiny ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
-
No, not always. There were fluctuations depending on several factors, nutrition being one (and an important one).
Still, 1.68 seems just tiny ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
wrote on last edited by [email protected]1.68m is 5'5" which is yeah short but not too far from the (self-reported) average male height in France today which is 5'9" (1.75m) (Bayesian estimates actually say 5'7" (1.70m)). During Bonaparte's time average male height in France was 5'4" (1.62m) so he was actually taller than average by a tiny bit.
-
Its cause the British and the French while both using feet and inches had different sizes for what an inch was. So a 5' 2" in France was closer to 5' 7" in England. But it's easier to say he is short and didn't like that.
wrote on last edited by [email protected]So he wasn’t tiny, he was just very short. Gotcha.
-
So he wasn’t tiny, he was just very short. Gotcha.
5 7 is short?
-
he was definitely average height for the time -- Napoleon Bonaparte
Charlemagne was a dopey little five-footer.
-
This post did not contain any content.
Napoleon 2: Electric Waterloo
-
5 7 is short?
Uh, yes?
-
Uh, yes?
That's like the worldwide average.
-
Charlemagne was a dopey little five-footer.
Charlemagne's tomb was opened in 1861 by scientists who reconstructed his skeleton and measured it at 1.92 metres (6 ft 4 in)
-
IIRC, the short Napoleon was his grandnephew, Napoleon III.
The register of the fortress Ham for 7 October 1840 contained a concise description of the new prisoner: "Age: thirty-two years. Height: one meter sixty-six.
They were about the same height
::: spoiler Tap for spoiler
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Napoleon_III
::: -
Charlemagne's tomb was opened in 1861 by scientists who reconstructed his skeleton and measured it at 1.92 metres (6 ft 4 in)
Y'all need to watch more movies.
-
Okay, but his dick was like 2 inches long though.
good enough for my ear holes
