Open Source Genetic Database Shuts Down to Protect Users From 'Authoritarian Governments'
-
This post did not contain any content.
-
W [email protected] shared this topic
-
This post did not contain any content.
Very good idea
-
This post did not contain any content.
“Across the globe there is a rise in far-right and other authoritarian governments. While they are cracking down on free and open societies, they are also dedicated to replacing scientific thought and reasoning with pseudoscience across disciplines,” Greshake Tzovaras wrote. “The risk/benefit calculus of providing free & open access to individual genetic data in 2025 is very different compared to 14 years ago. And so, sunsetting openSNP – along with deleting the data stored within it – feels like it is the most responsible act of stewardship for these data today.”
Glad he let his conscience rule his decision.
-
This post did not contain any content.
We will need information, data and knowledge like this some day ..... but not right now.
Maybe in another decade, maybe a century, maybe a millennium, maybe never
-
This post did not contain any content.
NAH, they neod to scrub the databases retroactively, including all the other ones still open.
-
This post did not contain any content.
Doesn't this just increase the value of the already for sale 23 and Me data?
-
Doesn't this just increase the value of the already for sale 23 and Me data?
What’s your point?
-
“Across the globe there is a rise in far-right and other authoritarian governments. While they are cracking down on free and open societies, they are also dedicated to replacing scientific thought and reasoning with pseudoscience across disciplines,” Greshake Tzovaras wrote. “The risk/benefit calculus of providing free & open access to individual genetic data in 2025 is very different compared to 14 years ago. And so, sunsetting openSNP – along with deleting the data stored within it – feels like it is the most responsible act of stewardship for these data today.”
Glad he let his conscience rule his decision.
this is who should be president
-
What’s your point?
My point is it's already for sale, both in bankruptcy proceedings and potentially in less legitimate spaces
-
My point is it's already for sale, both in bankruptcy proceedings and potentially in less legitimate spaces
Yeah, so it might fetch a slightly higher price. What does have to do with protecting the people potentially exposed by this project?
