Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

agnos.is Forums

  1. Home
  2. World News
  3. Canadian judge rules law to remove bike lanes is unconstitutional, cyclists have a right to safety

Canadian judge rules law to remove bike lanes is unconstitutional, cyclists have a right to safety

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved World News
world
23 Posts 19 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • D [email protected]
    This post did not contain any content.
    A This user is from outside of this forum
    A This user is from outside of this forum
    [email protected]
    wrote last edited by
    #8

    What a bizarre story. Toronto voters elect a city government in favor of bike lanes, then for some reason the premier of Ontario decides he knows what Toronto needs better than Toronto voters do, and now a judge decides that removing bike lanes is somehow unconstitutional because apparently the constitution is detailed enough to specify things like that. (Does this mean that it's unconstitutional to have any roads without bike lanes, or is it just unconstitutional to remove existing bike lanes?) I drive, bike lanes piss me off, but they're a local matter that should be decided by the local government.

    toastedravioli@midwest.socialT M I O evkob@lemmy.caE 5 Replies Last reply
    6
    • A [email protected]

      What a bizarre story. Toronto voters elect a city government in favor of bike lanes, then for some reason the premier of Ontario decides he knows what Toronto needs better than Toronto voters do, and now a judge decides that removing bike lanes is somehow unconstitutional because apparently the constitution is detailed enough to specify things like that. (Does this mean that it's unconstitutional to have any roads without bike lanes, or is it just unconstitutional to remove existing bike lanes?) I drive, bike lanes piss me off, but they're a local matter that should be decided by the local government.

      toastedravioli@midwest.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
      toastedravioli@midwest.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
      [email protected]
      wrote last edited by
      #9

      I see Ontario is the Missouri of Canada

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • D [email protected]
        This post did not contain any content.
        S This user is from outside of this forum
        S This user is from outside of this forum
        [email protected]
        wrote last edited by
        #10

        The brainless premier of Alberta is attempting to do the same with Edmonton and Calgary bike lanes.

        T 1 Reply Last reply
        8
        • A [email protected]

          What a bizarre story. Toronto voters elect a city government in favor of bike lanes, then for some reason the premier of Ontario decides he knows what Toronto needs better than Toronto voters do, and now a judge decides that removing bike lanes is somehow unconstitutional because apparently the constitution is detailed enough to specify things like that. (Does this mean that it's unconstitutional to have any roads without bike lanes, or is it just unconstitutional to remove existing bike lanes?) I drive, bike lanes piss me off, but they're a local matter that should be decided by the local government.

          M This user is from outside of this forum
          M This user is from outside of this forum
          [email protected]
          wrote last edited by
          #11

          I'm sorry, bike lanes piss you off?

          C 1 Reply Last reply
          9
          • D [email protected]
            This post did not contain any content.
            tal@lemmy.todayT This user is from outside of this forum
            tal@lemmy.todayT This user is from outside of this forum
            [email protected]
            wrote last edited by [email protected]
            #12

            Note that they put the ruling at the bottom of the article; I didn't initially see it and was having a hard time finding the text online.

            Also note that the government appears to be appealing the ruling, so probably going to be more to the story.

            https://globalnews.ca/news/11311369/ontario-bike-lane-removal-plan-court-defeat/

            1 Reply Last reply
            1
            • S [email protected]

              The brainless premier of Alberta is attempting to do the same with Edmonton and Calgary bike lanes.

              T This user is from outside of this forum
              T This user is from outside of this forum
              [email protected]
              wrote last edited by
              #13

              Have these fucks ever even walked? Like be a pedestrian in Alberta for 1km and if you had a brain you would understand those intersections are already way too wide.

              O 1 Reply Last reply
              2
              • A [email protected]

                What a bizarre story. Toronto voters elect a city government in favor of bike lanes, then for some reason the premier of Ontario decides he knows what Toronto needs better than Toronto voters do, and now a judge decides that removing bike lanes is somehow unconstitutional because apparently the constitution is detailed enough to specify things like that. (Does this mean that it's unconstitutional to have any roads without bike lanes, or is it just unconstitutional to remove existing bike lanes?) I drive, bike lanes piss me off, but they're a local matter that should be decided by the local government.

                I This user is from outside of this forum
                I This user is from outside of this forum
                [email protected]
                wrote last edited by
                #14

                because apparently the constitution is detailed enough to specify things like that.

                It's impossible for laws to include every single possible detail. Lawyers and judges exist to apply generic laws to specific cases. In this case, a lawyer argued that removing bike lanes creates a saftey issue and since the constitution says the government must protect "life and security of the person", removing bike lanes goes against the constitution. The judge agreed with the argument.

                1 Reply Last reply
                1
                • M [email protected]

                  I'm sorry, bike lanes piss you off?

                  C This user is from outside of this forum
                  C This user is from outside of this forum
                  [email protected]
                  wrote last edited by
                  #15

                  Pissed off at bike lanes.

                  Perturbed by marked road shoulders.

                  Panicked by meridians.

                  Pathological Pathway Prejudice is a real disease and it KILLS people!

                  Show some empathy!

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  2
                  • T [email protected]

                    Have these fucks ever even walked? Like be a pedestrian in Alberta for 1km and if you had a brain you would understand those intersections are already way too wide.

                    O This user is from outside of this forum
                    O This user is from outside of this forum
                    [email protected]
                    wrote last edited by
                    #16

                    Have these fucks ever even walked?

                    Have you seen Doug Ford?

                    G A 2 Replies Last reply
                    2
                    • A [email protected]

                      What a bizarre story. Toronto voters elect a city government in favor of bike lanes, then for some reason the premier of Ontario decides he knows what Toronto needs better than Toronto voters do, and now a judge decides that removing bike lanes is somehow unconstitutional because apparently the constitution is detailed enough to specify things like that. (Does this mean that it's unconstitutional to have any roads without bike lanes, or is it just unconstitutional to remove existing bike lanes?) I drive, bike lanes piss me off, but they're a local matter that should be decided by the local government.

                      O This user is from outside of this forum
                      O This user is from outside of this forum
                      [email protected]
                      wrote last edited by
                      #17

                      I drive, bike lanes piss me off,

                      You prefer cyclists ride in the regular traffic lane then? Because that's the alternative here.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      4
                      • O [email protected]

                        Have these fucks ever even walked?

                        Have you seen Doug Ford?

                        G This user is from outside of this forum
                        G This user is from outside of this forum
                        [email protected]
                        wrote last edited by
                        #18

                        Isn't the current premier a soccer mom Karen?

                        Aside from being a total idiot, of course.

                        S 1 Reply Last reply
                        1
                        • G [email protected]

                          Isn't the current premier a soccer mom Karen?

                          Aside from being a total idiot, of course.

                          S This user is from outside of this forum
                          S This user is from outside of this forum
                          [email protected]
                          wrote last edited by
                          #19

                          Yes in Alberta. Danielle Smith.

                          Doug Ford is the premier in Ontario.

                          Both idiots if you ask me lol

                          G 1 Reply Last reply
                          1
                          • S [email protected]

                            Yes in Alberta. Danielle Smith.

                            Doug Ford is the premier in Ontario.

                            Both idiots if you ask me lol

                            G This user is from outside of this forum
                            G This user is from outside of this forum
                            [email protected]
                            wrote last edited by
                            #20

                            Very much agreed.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            2
                            • A [email protected]

                              What a bizarre story. Toronto voters elect a city government in favor of bike lanes, then for some reason the premier of Ontario decides he knows what Toronto needs better than Toronto voters do, and now a judge decides that removing bike lanes is somehow unconstitutional because apparently the constitution is detailed enough to specify things like that. (Does this mean that it's unconstitutional to have any roads without bike lanes, or is it just unconstitutional to remove existing bike lanes?) I drive, bike lanes piss me off, but they're a local matter that should be decided by the local government.

                              evkob@lemmy.caE This user is from outside of this forum
                              evkob@lemmy.caE This user is from outside of this forum
                              [email protected]
                              wrote last edited by
                              #21

                              bike lanes piss me off

                              Agreed! Most bike lanes end up being nothing more than a painted bicycle gutter.

                              What we truly need is dedicated cycle paths adjacent to busy roads, and low-traffic, low-speed streets in commercial or residential areas where cyclists and pedestrians are prioritized over car traffic (see the Dutch city-planning concept of autoluw)

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              2
                              • D [email protected]
                                This post did not contain any content.
                                B This user is from outside of this forum
                                B This user is from outside of this forum
                                [email protected]
                                wrote last edited by
                                #22

                                So, I'm studying law, and this was one of the first things I analyzed. I expected the constitutional challenge would win.

                                I suspect if they're granted leave to appeal higher, it'll lose there, too.

                                But as always, there are ways the government of Ontario can push it through despite a court ruling.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • O [email protected]

                                  Have these fucks ever even walked?

                                  Have you seen Doug Ford?

                                  A This user is from outside of this forum
                                  A This user is from outside of this forum
                                  [email protected]
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #23

                                  I'm not in Canada, but a recent quote from one of our city councilmen when asked about improving rail service between cities was:

                                  "You should just fly like adults"

                                  Walking? Using public transit? That's for poors.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  1
                                  Reply
                                  • Reply as topic
                                  Log in to reply
                                  • Oldest to Newest
                                  • Newest to Oldest
                                  • Most Votes


                                  • Login

                                  • Login or register to search.
                                  • First post
                                    Last post
                                  0
                                  • Categories
                                  • Recent
                                  • Tags
                                  • Popular
                                  • World
                                  • Users
                                  • Groups