Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

agnos.is Forums

  1. Home
  2. Technology
  3. Firefox deletes promise to never sell personal data, asks users not to panic

Firefox deletes promise to never sell personal data, asks users not to panic

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Technology
310 Posts 177 Posters 3.4k Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • F [email protected]

    Nice, what issues?

    TBH I was tempted to try IceCat first because of the name (I’m not a furry but I do think cats are cool). But no official binaries and I’m already running enough custom-compiled software, thing I need least is for my browser to be like that too haha

    R This user is from outside of this forum
    R This user is from outside of this forum
    [email protected]
    wrote on last edited by
    #259

    Ahhh that makes sense hahaha.

    The issues I was running into I’m SURE stemmed from having a bloated profile, so I could have fixed them by clearing my profile out, or reinstalling (probably.) video on my partner’s computer (our main entertainment machine) would only play in Private Mode for some reason. Hanime wouldn’t play anything at all, the site was bugged out. Many pages displayed super weird on their machine, too. My computer had some video playing issues but I didn’t run into pages displaying strangely.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • Z [email protected]

      I wonder how much this affects things if you’ve already gone through Firefox’s settings to max out privacy and turn off all telemetry.

      I resisted switching to Librewolf because Firefox works great (including M365 in Linux at work) and seemed to have the options you’d want for privacy and security.

      This doesn’t feel like an emergency, especially in a chrome/edge dominated world. But it’s back on the list of things to investigate transitioning away from.

      R This user is from outside of this forum
      R This user is from outside of this forum
      [email protected]
      wrote on last edited by
      #260

      Yep. It stinks. We'll see if it was just a fart and it'll go away or if they crapped and we'll have to jump ship.

      Z 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • R [email protected]

        Yep. It stinks. We'll see if it was just a fart and it'll go away or if they crapped and we'll have to jump ship.

        Z This user is from outside of this forum
        Z This user is from outside of this forum
        [email protected]
        wrote on last edited by
        #261

        Maybe we should all throw some kind of support behind https://ladybird.org/ with an eye to the future.

        That project isn’t problematic for some reason I haven’t heard about, is it?

        (Problematic other than web browsers being gigantic pieces of software, and ladybrid itself not even being in alpha yet)

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • F [email protected]

          Firefox maker Mozilla deleted a promise to never sell its users' personal data and is trying to assure worried users that its approach to privacy hasn't fundamentally changed. Until recently, a Firefox FAQ promised that the browser maker never has and never will sell its users' personal data. An archived version from January 30 says:

          Does Firefox sell your personal data?

          Nope. Never have, never will. And we protect you from many of the advertisers who do. Firefox products are designed to protect your privacy. That's a promise.

          That promise is removed from the current version. There's also a notable change in a data privacy FAQ that used to say, "Mozilla doesn't sell data about you, and we don't buy data about you."

          The data privacy FAQ now explains that Mozilla is no longer making blanket promises about not selling data because some legal jurisdictions define "sale" in a very broad way:

          Mozilla doesn't sell data about you (in the way that most people think about "selling data"), and we don't buy data about you. Since we strive for transparency, and the LEGAL definition of "sale of data" is extremely broad in some places, we've had to step back from making the definitive statements you know and love. We still put a lot of work into making sure that the data that we share with our partners (which we need to do to make Firefox commercially viable) is stripped of any identifying information, or shared only in the aggregate, or is put through our privacy preserving technologies (like OHTTP).

          Mozilla didn't say which legal jurisdictions have these broad definitions.

          Z This user is from outside of this forum
          Z This user is from outside of this forum
          [email protected]
          wrote on last edited by
          #262

          So sad. I have used Firefox since 2006. Today I removed it for good from all of my devices. So long old friend. I cant wait for Ladybird to release.

          M 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • G [email protected]

            Anyone still using Firefox after this probably hasn't been keeping up with Mozilla's many controversies. If this is your first time here, I can see why you'd decide to overlook it. I did for a long time, but this is the final straw for me. Luckily, instead of building anything useful over the past decades, Mozilla leadership has been instead focused on enriching themselves. That means deleting my Mozilla account right now was easy.

            I've now moved to LibreWolf, because I don't want to support Chromium's dominance, but if that project dies out I'll jump ship. It'll be a real shame if the world gets stuck with Chromium as the only viable browser, but it won't be my fault. It will be Mozilla leadership's fault.

            ? Offline
            ? Offline
            Guest
            wrote on last edited by
            #263

            Yup. I might switch to Waterfox this weekend

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • Z [email protected]

              So sad. I have used Firefox since 2006. Today I removed it for good from all of my devices. So long old friend. I cant wait for Ladybird to release.

              M This user is from outside of this forum
              M This user is from outside of this forum
              [email protected]
              wrote on last edited by
              #264

              what is your current open source / FOSS alternative?

              ? Z 2 Replies Last reply
              0
              • F [email protected]

                There are different kinds of free. Free beer, free speech and free weekend are three different kinds of free that software can have, but not necessarily at the same time.

                M This user is from outside of this forum
                M This user is from outside of this forum
                [email protected]
                wrote on last edited by
                #265

                but all of those taste better with free beer

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • ? Guest

                  https://thehackernews.com/2025/03/mozilla-updates-firefox-terms-again.html?m=1

                  Apparently they changed it due to backlash.

                  A This user is from outside of this forum
                  A This user is from outside of this forum
                  [email protected]
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #266

                  Ok so I don't have to change browsers?

                  P 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • X [email protected]

                    Whatever the 2006-2007 days were.

                    elephantium@lemmy.worldE This user is from outside of this forum
                    elephantium@lemmy.worldE This user is from outside of this forum
                    [email protected]
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #267

                    Ah, yep, def when they called it Firefox.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • M [email protected]

                      what is your current open source / FOSS alternative?

                      ? Offline
                      ? Offline
                      Guest
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #268

                      zen i heard is good. probably gonna give it a try one of these days

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • S [email protected]

                        If Firefox is losing its footing as a privacy focused browser then where do we go? If your on Mac maybe Safari?

                        ? Offline
                        ? Offline
                        Guest
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #269

                        zen, ladybird, waterfox are some that i've heard of before. zen is out now. idk about the others. one of my friends uses zen and it's pretty neat.

                        ? 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • cupcakezealot@lemmy.blahaj.zoneC [email protected]

                          Also the fact that he's a rabid homophobe and transphobe.

                          B This user is from outside of this forum
                          B This user is from outside of this forum
                          [email protected]
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #270

                          COVID-denier, too.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • ? Guest

                            https://thehackernews.com/2025/03/mozilla-updates-firefox-terms-again.html?m=1

                            Apparently they changed it due to backlash.

                            degenerationip@lemmy.worldD This user is from outside of this forum
                            degenerationip@lemmy.worldD This user is from outside of this forum
                            [email protected]
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #271

                            Hm. Reading further in the article and since its not the first no-no.. I have doubts.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • F [email protected]

                              Firefox maker Mozilla deleted a promise to never sell its users' personal data and is trying to assure worried users that its approach to privacy hasn't fundamentally changed. Until recently, a Firefox FAQ promised that the browser maker never has and never will sell its users' personal data. An archived version from January 30 says:

                              Does Firefox sell your personal data?

                              Nope. Never have, never will. And we protect you from many of the advertisers who do. Firefox products are designed to protect your privacy. That's a promise.

                              That promise is removed from the current version. There's also a notable change in a data privacy FAQ that used to say, "Mozilla doesn't sell data about you, and we don't buy data about you."

                              The data privacy FAQ now explains that Mozilla is no longer making blanket promises about not selling data because some legal jurisdictions define "sale" in a very broad way:

                              Mozilla doesn't sell data about you (in the way that most people think about "selling data"), and we don't buy data about you. Since we strive for transparency, and the LEGAL definition of "sale of data" is extremely broad in some places, we've had to step back from making the definitive statements you know and love. We still put a lot of work into making sure that the data that we share with our partners (which we need to do to make Firefox commercially viable) is stripped of any identifying information, or shared only in the aggregate, or is put through our privacy preserving technologies (like OHTTP).

                              Mozilla didn't say which legal jurisdictions have these broad definitions.

                              J This user is from outside of this forum
                              J This user is from outside of this forum
                              [email protected]
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #272

                              I haven't been presented with any Ts and C's. Do they apply if I already installed Firefox before this?

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • F [email protected]

                                Firefox maker Mozilla deleted a promise to never sell its users' personal data and is trying to assure worried users that its approach to privacy hasn't fundamentally changed. Until recently, a Firefox FAQ promised that the browser maker never has and never will sell its users' personal data. An archived version from January 30 says:

                                Does Firefox sell your personal data?

                                Nope. Never have, never will. And we protect you from many of the advertisers who do. Firefox products are designed to protect your privacy. That's a promise.

                                That promise is removed from the current version. There's also a notable change in a data privacy FAQ that used to say, "Mozilla doesn't sell data about you, and we don't buy data about you."

                                The data privacy FAQ now explains that Mozilla is no longer making blanket promises about not selling data because some legal jurisdictions define "sale" in a very broad way:

                                Mozilla doesn't sell data about you (in the way that most people think about "selling data"), and we don't buy data about you. Since we strive for transparency, and the LEGAL definition of "sale of data" is extremely broad in some places, we've had to step back from making the definitive statements you know and love. We still put a lot of work into making sure that the data that we share with our partners (which we need to do to make Firefox commercially viable) is stripped of any identifying information, or shared only in the aggregate, or is put through our privacy preserving technologies (like OHTTP).

                                Mozilla didn't say which legal jurisdictions have these broad definitions.

                                ? Offline
                                ? Offline
                                Guest
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #273

                                They're cash strapped and cash strapped companies are the worst when it comes to being trustworthy. That's all the calculus that needs to be done.

                                S B 2 Replies Last reply
                                0
                                • B [email protected]

                                  Mozilla are a non profit organisation. Their recent blog post says that they will invest in advertising to increase short-term revenue that they need to "grow". The blog goes on to talk about the increase in board members, and new leaders being added. The CEO and these new leaders are highly paid...

                                  To me this looks bad. It looks to me that Mozilla's new leaders have pushed out the old; and are now moving towards advertising and selling user data not because they need it to stabilise and survive, but because they need it to pay the people making the decision to burn trust and reputation. It has become a top-heavy organisation, and greed has seeped in.

                                  A few people will be self-enriched by this, and then the orgasation will be weaker as a result.

                                  A This user is from outside of this forum
                                  A This user is from outside of this forum
                                  [email protected]
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #274

                                  Another decade and we'll be back inside libraries, let's stock up on epubs while we still have internet browsing.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • F [email protected]

                                    Firefox maker Mozilla deleted a promise to never sell its users' personal data and is trying to assure worried users that its approach to privacy hasn't fundamentally changed. Until recently, a Firefox FAQ promised that the browser maker never has and never will sell its users' personal data. An archived version from January 30 says:

                                    Does Firefox sell your personal data?

                                    Nope. Never have, never will. And we protect you from many of the advertisers who do. Firefox products are designed to protect your privacy. That's a promise.

                                    That promise is removed from the current version. There's also a notable change in a data privacy FAQ that used to say, "Mozilla doesn't sell data about you, and we don't buy data about you."

                                    The data privacy FAQ now explains that Mozilla is no longer making blanket promises about not selling data because some legal jurisdictions define "sale" in a very broad way:

                                    Mozilla doesn't sell data about you (in the way that most people think about "selling data"), and we don't buy data about you. Since we strive for transparency, and the LEGAL definition of "sale of data" is extremely broad in some places, we've had to step back from making the definitive statements you know and love. We still put a lot of work into making sure that the data that we share with our partners (which we need to do to make Firefox commercially viable) is stripped of any identifying information, or shared only in the aggregate, or is put through our privacy preserving technologies (like OHTTP).

                                    Mozilla didn't say which legal jurisdictions have these broad definitions.

                                    G This user is from outside of this forum
                                    G This user is from outside of this forum
                                    [email protected]
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #275

                                    my other comment is here about the acting CEO of Mozilla, Laura Chambers and asking about potential connections to Musk and Thiel.

                                    https://lemmy.world/comment/15382904

                                    I just got an alert that I need to update my FF browser before March 14th. that's another date that keeps coming up.

                                    March 14th is the

                                    • date of the next government shutdown due to budget negotiations
                                    • 53 days after trump took office (same amount of days it took Hitler to destroy German democracy before WW2
                                    • date that a major root certificate ends on(what once was) one of the most privacy focused browsers that will break existing add-ons and potentially break/expose you online
                                    • date of a total lunar eclipse (it perfectly frames the US in the middle, serious go look it up)

                                    don't forget that the ides of march is march 15th, as well as March is named after Mars the God of War.

                                    I'm no mystic, but symbolism is important to megalomaniacs.

                                    anyone else know of other important technological or political events happening on March 14th?

                                    S lattrommi@lemmy.mlL 2 Replies Last reply
                                    0
                                    • G [email protected]

                                      my other comment is here about the acting CEO of Mozilla, Laura Chambers and asking about potential connections to Musk and Thiel.

                                      https://lemmy.world/comment/15382904

                                      I just got an alert that I need to update my FF browser before March 14th. that's another date that keeps coming up.

                                      March 14th is the

                                      • date of the next government shutdown due to budget negotiations
                                      • 53 days after trump took office (same amount of days it took Hitler to destroy German democracy before WW2
                                      • date that a major root certificate ends on(what once was) one of the most privacy focused browsers that will break existing add-ons and potentially break/expose you online
                                      • date of a total lunar eclipse (it perfectly frames the US in the middle, serious go look it up)

                                      don't forget that the ides of march is march 15th, as well as March is named after Mars the God of War.

                                      I'm no mystic, but symbolism is important to megalomaniacs.

                                      anyone else know of other important technological or political events happening on March 14th?

                                      S This user is from outside of this forum
                                      S This user is from outside of this forum
                                      [email protected]
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #276

                                      It's pi day, so I'll probably be eating a nice pie that day.

                                      M 1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • ? Guest

                                        They're cash strapped and cash strapped companies are the worst when it comes to being trustworthy. That's all the calculus that needs to be done.

                                        S This user is from outside of this forum
                                        S This user is from outside of this forum
                                        [email protected]
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #277

                                        How about asking for money? I'd gladly pay if they stripped out a bunch of the nonsense they do and focus on making a better browser. Or keep that crap and let me donate directly to Firefox development.

                                        internetcitizen2@lemmy.worldI 1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • M [email protected]

                                          Glad they clarified. To me the "selling data being defined broadly" argument made sense in the context of Google paying them to be included as a search provider. Because there is an argument that Google paying Firefox, and then the user entering a search and that being sent to Google's servers could be legally seen as Mozilla selling data to Google.

                                          S This user is from outside of this forum
                                          S This user is from outside of this forum
                                          [email protected]
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #278

                                          They should clarify that then. Explain any and all situations that could be considered "selling user data" and explain what data that consists of. Then explain how to avoid it.

                                          That shouldn't be hard.

                                          gamermanh@lemmy.dbzer0.comG 1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups