In my opinion AI should cover the worst content; ones that harm people just by looking at it.
-
In my opinion AI should cover the worst content; ones that harm people just by looking at it. Anything up to debate is a big no; however there exists many content where even seeing the content can be disturbing to anyone seeing it.
-
System shared this topic on
-
In my opinion AI should cover the worst content; ones that harm people just by looking at it. Anything up to debate is a big no; however there exists many content where even seeing the content can be disturbing to anyone seeing it.
Yeah, but who decides what content is disturbing? I mean there is CSAM, but the fact that it even exists shows that not everyone is disturbed by it.
-
Yeah, but who decides what content is disturbing? I mean there is CSAM, but the fact that it even exists shows that not everyone is disturbed by it.
You’ll never be able to get a definition that covers your question. The world isn’t black and white. It’s gray and because of that a line has to be drawn and yes it would always be considered be arbitrary for some. But a line must be drawn none the less.
-
Yeah, but who decides what content is disturbing? I mean there is CSAM, but the fact that it even exists shows that not everyone is disturbed by it.
This is a fucking wild take
-
This is a fucking wild take
I mean I'm not defending CSAM, just to be clear. I just disagree with any usage of AI that could turn somebody's life upside down based on a false positive.
-
You’ll never be able to get a definition that covers your question. The world isn’t black and white. It’s gray and because of that a line has to be drawn and yes it would always be considered be arbitrary for some. But a line must be drawn none the less.
Agreed 100%, a line absolutely should be drawn.
That said, as a parent of 5 kids, I'm more concerned for false positives. I've heard enough horror stories about parents getting arrested over completely innocent pics of their kids as toddlers or infants, that may have genitalia showing. Like them at 6 months old doing something silly in the tub, or what have you. I don't trust a computer program that doesn't understand context to accurately handle those kinds of photos.
-
Agreed 100%, a line absolutely should be drawn.
That said, as a parent of 5 kids, I'm more concerned for false positives. I've heard enough horror stories about parents getting arrested over completely innocent pics of their kids as toddlers or infants, that may have genitalia showing. Like them at 6 months old doing something silly in the tub, or what have you. I don't trust a computer program that doesn't understand context to accurately handle those kinds of photos.
There's a vast gulf between automated moderation systems deleting posts and calling the cops on someone.
-
There's a vast gulf between automated moderation systems deleting posts and calling the cops on someone.
You would be shocked.
My ex has called the cops on me more than a few times in our past, because she just didn't like how I was doing things. after our divorce, she called the cops and CPS on me and my now wife for abusing our kids. My neighbor called the cops on us because one of my kids was having a temper tantrum. It's not out of the realm of possibility for someone to be batshit enough to call the cops over an innocent baby-in-the-bathtub picture (though like I said, parents shouldn't be sharing that on social media anyway, but here we are).
-
System shared this topic on