Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

agnos.is Forums

  1. Home
  2. Ask Lemmy
  3. What old technology are you surprised is still in use today?

What old technology are you surprised is still in use today?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Ask Lemmy
asklemmy
92 Posts 64 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • L [email protected]

    Interesting, how is eFax any more secure than email? The advantage of fax is it's one machine to one machine, no possibility of interception without physically tapping the POTS line.

    H This user is from outside of this forum
    H This user is from outside of this forum
    [email protected]
    wrote last edited by
    #32

    It's not. Information is secure at rest and encrypted during transfer, but once it reaches the part where it is sent over voip using a telecom provider, it has the same issues as it always did. We use it because its the best way to send this many faxes, as well as automate things using our internal applications to send faxes through it as well as other applications that we leverage its API to use the service. One advantage that makes it semi more secure is if we send a fax to another client that also uses the same service as we are then then it's actually a secure stream for the entire path.

    1 Reply Last reply
    3
    • B [email protected]

      Microsoft Windows

      T This user is from outside of this forum
      T This user is from outside of this forum
      [email protected]
      wrote last edited by
      #33

      If some of the stories are to be believed, some of the code dates back to 3.1/dos too

      meekah@lemmy.worldM 1 Reply Last reply
      1
      • E [email protected]

        The Wheel. We should've graduated to antigravity by now, don't you think?

        T This user is from outside of this forum
        T This user is from outside of this forum
        [email protected]
        wrote last edited by
        #34

        we dont posess the knowlegde of how to do that, that isnt done by magnetism. maybe if aliens come to earth than maybe.

        S 1 Reply Last reply
        1
        • J [email protected]

          Toilet paper

          T This user is from outside of this forum
          T This user is from outside of this forum
          [email protected]
          wrote last edited by
          #35

          70% of humans dont use toilet paper, so it might be a new tech instead of an old one.

          R 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • T [email protected]

            If some of the stories are to be believed, some of the code dates back to 3.1/dos too

            meekah@lemmy.worldM This user is from outside of this forum
            meekah@lemmy.worldM This user is from outside of this forum
            [email protected]
            wrote last edited by
            #36

            Oh you can clearly see that this is true when you launch certain programs:

            https://www.reddit.com/r/Windows10/comments/o1x183/the_famous_windows_31_dialogue_is_again_in/

            T 1 Reply Last reply
            7
            • D [email protected]

              Mirrors on cars.

              I mean, logically I know why, but it just feels so weird and out of place in the 21st century.

              Like you got this high tech vehicle with a bunch of computers inside and a lot of screens/displays, radios, GPS, “assisted driving”, then you see this mirror that’s thousands of years old and not some advanced 360 radar system.

              I know that a mirror isn’t gonna fail like electronics do, so its better reliability, but still feel odd seeing old tech and new tech merged.

              T This user is from outside of this forum
              T This user is from outside of this forum
              [email protected]
              wrote last edited by
              #37

              I spend a fair bit of time on construction sites, and cameras have one huge issue compared to mirrors: They're one-way.

              With a mirror, I can see the driver in the mirror. I can make eyecontact and confirm that they've seen me. With a camera, I have no idea if they've seen me. Maybe they can see more, but if they happen not to be looking, I have no way to tell.

              And our stupid road regulations don't allow for both.

              1 Reply Last reply
              8
              • meekah@lemmy.worldM [email protected]

                Oh you can clearly see that this is true when you launch certain programs:

                https://www.reddit.com/r/Windows10/comments/o1x183/the_famous_windows_31_dialogue_is_again_in/

                T This user is from outside of this forum
                T This user is from outside of this forum
                [email protected]
                wrote last edited by
                #38

                Oh that's tremendous, I don't run windows to see this.
                But come to think of it I have come across some ancient screens doing odbc/data connections ancient popups in excel at work!

                1 Reply Last reply
                3
                • A [email protected]

                  A lot of production industry still runs on PLC from the 90s or older and uses DOS supervision systems. They would continue using it but are usually forced to upgrade once they run out of spare parts and / or staff that can maintain it.

                  C This user is from outside of this forum
                  C This user is from outside of this forum
                  [email protected]
                  wrote last edited by
                  #39

                  Yep, my most important tool at work is controlled by DOS software running in a 386. Plenty of Windows XP’s around too.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  1
                  • B [email protected]

                    I'm surprised nobody mentioned jack plugs yet. Basically unchanged since 1877 when it was invented for phone switchboards, roughly as old as safety pins or modern hairpins (give or take a few decades)

                    S This user is from outside of this forum
                    S This user is from outside of this forum
                    [email protected]
                    wrote last edited by
                    #40

                    That can't be the actual name of those, is it?

                    I've always kinda wondered, and generally call them TRS or something (I'm audio engineering background, American, millennial), so looked it up:

                    From https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phone_connector_(audio) under the "other terms" section:

                    The 1902 International Library of Technology simply uses jack for the female and plug for the male connector.[3] The 1989 Sound Reinforcement Handbook uses phone jack for the female and phone plug for the male connector.[4] Robert McLeish, who worked at the BBC, uses jack or jack socket for the female and jack plug for the male connector in his 2005 book Radio Production.[5] The American Society of Mechanical Engineers, as of 2007, says the more fixed electrical connector is the jack, while the less fixed connector is the plug, without regard to the gender of the connector contacts.[6] The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers in 1975 also made a standard that was withdrawn in 1997.[7]

                    The intended application for a phone connector has also resulted in names such as audio jack, headphone jack, stereo plug, microphone jack, aux input, etc. Among audio engineers, the connector may often simply be called a quarter-inch to distinguish it from XLR, another frequently used audio connector. These naming variations are also used for the 3.5 mm connectors, which have been called mini-phone, mini-stereo, mini jack, etc.

                    RCA connectors are differently shaped, but confusingly are similarly named as phono plugs and phono jacks (or in the UK, phono sockets). 3.5 mm connectors are sometimes—counter to the connector manufacturers' nomenclature[8]—referred to as mini phonos.[9]

                    Confusion also arises because phone jack and phone plug may sometimes refer to the RJ11 and various older telephone sockets and plugs that connect wired telephones to wall outlets.

                    F 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • B [email protected]

                      For the uninitiated, Ikarus was a Hungarian bus factory that produced buses to the Eastern block, some of those are probably still running somewhere in Mongolia. The Ikarus 256 was produced between 1974-2002, so in the best case that thing was at least 23 years old.

                      But even better, someone got to travel on an Ikarus 55 on the same day (1954-1974), which used to be great in their time, but definitely weren't made for 36C summers, the lack of air conditioning combined with the sunshine roof that used to increase the feel of comfort in 1958 created a living hell for the passengers packed into that rolling museum with barely openable windows.

                      M This user is from outside of this forum
                      M This user is from outside of this forum
                      [email protected]
                      wrote last edited by [email protected]
                      #41

                      Ah, so it’s the Hungarian version of the USPS Grumman LLV (Long Life Vehicle).

                      The United States Postal Service needed a vendor to produce mail trucks. They ended up signing a contract with an aerospace manufacturer named Grumman. The manufacturer retooled one of their plane factories, and started producing what they called the LLV. The company sold each truck extremely cheaply, but had an exclusive maintenance agreement to service the vehicles. Their goal was to make a profit on the service instead.

                      But Grumman made the vehicles too well. The LLVs were basically a thin airplane aluminum skin bolted to a pre-fabbed General Motors wheel frame, and the engines were rock solid. They skipped basically all of the modern design conveniences like AC/heating or a radio. It was basically a glorified go kart with a windshield that could do ~55MPH. It basically bankrupted Grumman, because the LLVs never needed maintenance. They spent a ton of money to retool their factory and sold a ton of LLVs basically at materials cost, then never recouped their expenses. The LLVs were produced all the way back in the 80’s and early 90’s, and the USPS is still actively trying to phase them out in favor of newer EVs. Grumman folded in the mid 90’s, after a decade of continuous losses from the LLVs.

                      Basically any American old enough to vote will know what a Grumman LLV looks like, even if they don’t know what it’s called:

                      real_squids@sopuli.xyzR 1 Reply Last reply
                      5
                      • T [email protected]

                        70% of humans dont use toilet paper, so it might be a new tech instead of an old one.

                        R This user is from outside of this forum
                        R This user is from outside of this forum
                        [email protected]
                        wrote last edited by
                        #42

                        A lot of those don't use water toilets either

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • M [email protected]

                          Ah, so it’s the Hungarian version of the USPS Grumman LLV (Long Life Vehicle).

                          The United States Postal Service needed a vendor to produce mail trucks. They ended up signing a contract with an aerospace manufacturer named Grumman. The manufacturer retooled one of their plane factories, and started producing what they called the LLV. The company sold each truck extremely cheaply, but had an exclusive maintenance agreement to service the vehicles. Their goal was to make a profit on the service instead.

                          But Grumman made the vehicles too well. The LLVs were basically a thin airplane aluminum skin bolted to a pre-fabbed General Motors wheel frame, and the engines were rock solid. They skipped basically all of the modern design conveniences like AC/heating or a radio. It was basically a glorified go kart with a windshield that could do ~55MPH. It basically bankrupted Grumman, because the LLVs never needed maintenance. They spent a ton of money to retool their factory and sold a ton of LLVs basically at materials cost, then never recouped their expenses. The LLVs were produced all the way back in the 80’s and early 90’s, and the USPS is still actively trying to phase them out in favor of newer EVs. Grumman folded in the mid 90’s, after a decade of continuous losses from the LLVs.

                          Basically any American old enough to vote will know what a Grumman LLV looks like, even if they don’t know what it’s called:

                          real_squids@sopuli.xyzR This user is from outside of this forum
                          real_squids@sopuli.xyzR This user is from outside of this forum
                          [email protected]
                          wrote last edited by
                          #43

                          I love the payload capacity on these. Exact in the way you expect aircraft to be.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          2
                          • N [email protected]

                            They should get rid of the windows too.

                            real_squids@sopuli.xyzR This user is from outside of this forum
                            real_squids@sopuli.xyzR This user is from outside of this forum
                            [email protected]
                            wrote last edited by
                            #44

                            Oh they're trying, hiphi Z and avatr 12 from the rear:

                            Both rely on mirrors and cameras to replace the lack of rear glass

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • theimpressivex@lemmy.todayT [email protected]
                              This post did not contain any content.
                              F This user is from outside of this forum
                              F This user is from outside of this forum
                              [email protected]
                              wrote last edited by
                              #45

                              Fax, still in official use in Germany.

                              D B S B 4 Replies Last reply
                              14
                              • C [email protected]

                                Kia/Hyundai uses cameras and screens instead of mirrors in South Korea but that technology is illegal here in the US so we get mirrors. Its not too different than adaptive headlights which can adjust themselves to not blind other drivers. Legal in Europe but illegal in the US.

                                real_squids@sopuli.xyzR This user is from outside of this forum
                                real_squids@sopuli.xyzR This user is from outside of this forum
                                [email protected]
                                wrote last edited by
                                #46

                                I think those are legal where I'm at, but if you have both mirrors and cameras it should be allowed by default. Also in the case of Honda e, I wonder how much power the screens and "mirrors" are eating, in a tiny car like that it might be noticeable.

                                M 1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • theimpressivex@lemmy.todayT [email protected]
                                  This post did not contain any content.
                                  tattorack@lemmy.worldT This user is from outside of this forum
                                  tattorack@lemmy.worldT This user is from outside of this forum
                                  [email protected]
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #47

                                  Steam engines.

                                  The vast majority of our power comes from making something really hot and boiling water. Coal plant? Oil plant? Gas plant? Nuclear fission plant? Geothermal plant? The grand holy grail of energy production that would be a nuclear fusion plant? All steam engines.

                                  Yes, unbeknownst to everyone, this is what a steampunk society realistically looks like.

                                  E thebat@lemmy.worldT 2 Replies Last reply
                                  28
                                  • F [email protected]

                                    Fax, still in official use in Germany.

                                    D This user is from outside of this forum
                                    D This user is from outside of this forum
                                    [email protected]
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #48

                                    Very common in the US medical field as well

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    3
                                    • theimpressivex@lemmy.todayT [email protected]
                                      This post did not contain any content.
                                      S This user is from outside of this forum
                                      S This user is from outside of this forum
                                      [email protected]
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #49

                                      The sewing machine.
                                      Like we got 3d printers than can give me whatever I want in 20 hrs but I still got to fight with a sewing machine to stitch an outfit. Like why no polyester clothes printer?

                                      M A 2 Replies Last reply
                                      4
                                      • S [email protected]

                                        The sewing machine.
                                        Like we got 3d printers than can give me whatever I want in 20 hrs but I still got to fight with a sewing machine to stitch an outfit. Like why no polyester clothes printer?

                                        M This user is from outside of this forum
                                        M This user is from outside of this forum
                                        [email protected]
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #50

                                        For one, polyester fabric and clothes are just terrible

                                        Two, technically you can 3d print a chainmail shirt, but it'd suck to wear normally

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        6
                                        • spankmonkey@lemmy.worldS [email protected]

                                          Legally defined as secure, not actually secure.

                                          They are fairly insecure in practice, since they are throwing the data at misdialed numbers and they are frequently placed in shared and insecure locations in the building where lots of people can access whatever comes through.

                                          B This user is from outside of this forum
                                          B This user is from outside of this forum
                                          [email protected]
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #51

                                          In the US they cannot be in "insecure locations" legally. And sending HIPAA materials to the wrong number is a reportable offense.

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          1
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups