The duality of man
-
What's worse, bombing the middle east, or calling the Democrats out for bombing the middle east?
Calling the Dems out for bombing the middle East while it is not a partisan issue.
-
You understand that doesn't contradict my point in any way right?
-
This is propaganda enabling the far right to win future elections.
When you look into the history of this country it's fucking horrific. And not just in the obvious "we used to have slaves" or the "we bombed the Vietnamese" way.
-
Seriously. Tired of folks trying to act like they’re on the same level of shitiness. Magats are in a league of their own.
This country has been going to shit since Ronald fucking Reagan. Yes, that means Republicans are terrible. That also means the Democrats are either complicit or powerless to stop it.
-
When you look into the history of this country it's fucking horrific. And not just in the obvious "we used to have slaves" or the "we bombed the Vietnamese" way.
This is not related to the post. And pointless.
-
Republican today should say “four, and let’s bomb the Middle East twice!”
"Let's bomb the middle east and also blue states!"
-
You understand that doesn't contradict my point in any way right?
You don't understand how Democratic politicians that have directly funded trump and normalized right-wing positions (immigration is a great example of such) are far more responsible for Trump winning the election than online commenters who criticize the Democratic Party due to it's proximity to the Republican Party?
Capitalists are responsible for the rise of fascism. Both parties are beholden to the interests of their capital donors, they simply play different roles to uphold that interest.
Progressives who criticize the Democratic party for failing to represent their constituents, who are supposed to be working class Americans, not billionaire donors, are the ones applying pressure on the Democratic party to actually fight against fascism instead of against progressive candidates and policies. The Democratic Establishment will not change without overwhelming pressure from working class Americans
-
This is not related to the post. And pointless.
wrote last edited by [email protected]Yes it is, the "reality" for 100 years ago was a lie.
Literally 100 years ago was the build up to the great depression. The side was "workers should be able to eat" versus "the workers shouldn't have rights"
Fast forward 40 years and it was "it's okay to sit next to black people" vs. "Races should not mix and any attempt to do so should be met with extreme violence"
-
This post did not contain any content.
Too not American to understand
-
This post did not contain any content.
Electrolytes are what plants crave.
-
This is not related to the post. And pointless.
It isn’t possible to have a coherent political discussion without knowledge of the history that got us here. Dismissing it as pointless only ensures it will be repeated.
-
This post did not contain any content.
Why would you pick the issue they both agree on for the bottom panel?
-
This is propaganda enabling the far right to win future elections.
If the dems can't even beat the fucking goon squad, what good are they?
-
Ah yes the checks notes
propaganda of admitting that the opposition also bombs the middle east, marginally less so than the far right.(Although some dems are doing all they can to edge closer to the far right)
But the Dems don't (checks notes...) celebrate deporting illegal immigrants! I'm sure the people getting bombed in the middle east know that's where the line is drawn! They think I'm a good guy for supporting Democrats, right!???
-
Why would you pick the issue they both agree on for the bottom panel?
In the first panel both are, somewhat vapidly, disagreeing based on their respective perspectives on objective reality (vapid because they both fail to see that it very clearly is a curled up sperm!)
In the second panel, one has broken with reality and the other is unwavering in their obsession with an out of scope issue. Meanwhile, the third: the artist or the viewer that shares neither perspective, is alienated because the plainly visible sperm doesn’t even matter anymore.
It’s not about whether they agree about anything. It’s about sperm.
-
It isn’t possible to have a coherent political discussion without knowledge of the history that got us here. Dismissing it as pointless only ensures it will be repeated.
Bringing it up without a point is pointless.
-
Calling the Dems out for bombing the middle East while it is not a partisan issue.
Oh, so if our rulers all agree on something then we cannot call them out on it? That's what you're implying here...
-
This country has been going to shit since Ronald fucking Reagan. Yes, that means Republicans are terrible. That also means the Democrats are either complicit or powerless to stop it.
wrote last edited by [email protected]Complicit. In an imbecilic way, but complicit.
-
Why would you pick the issue they both agree on for the bottom panel?
100 years ago wasn't the democrat party "just about" to "secede" from the dixiecrats?
-
This is propaganda enabling the far right to win future elections.
You are not gonna like this but, democrats and Republicans are far right
