Homie accidentally took off his white hood to reply
-
Agree with antifascist stuff. Just nitpicking the fascist idiot's idiotic words: what the hell is an example of a non-politically-motivated assassination?? isn't every assassination politically motivated?
Assassination of passion.
-
Agree with antifascist stuff. Just nitpicking the fascist idiot's idiotic words: what the hell is an example of a non-politically-motivated assassination?? isn't every assassination politically motivated?
wrote on last edited by [email protected]Financially-motivated assassinations? Having someone killed before they can disown you?
-
Um, actually Wish is always cast at level 9.
wrote on last edited by [email protected]The old 3.5e Epic Level Handbook had 10th level spells, and the rules surrounding their use.
So, maybe you could use a 10th level spell slot to stengthen Wish?
I haven't played D&D this century, and the last Pathfinder I ran was lower level and we only did 1 or 2 actual play sessions before scheduling fell apart. (Also, I'm a pretty bad DM, even working from an existing published campaign; people just want me to be GM because I can remember rules.)
-
Reactionary politics in a nutshell
it's in the name
-
Agree with antifascist stuff. Just nitpicking the fascist idiot's idiotic words: what the hell is an example of a non-politically-motivated assassination?? isn't every assassination politically motivated?
Mob hits.
-
This post did not contain any content.wrote on last edited by [email protected]
Riegel could have done better here; his comeback isn't really that smart. See, this same script works exactly the same in reverse:
- right winger: "Down with pedophiles!"
- left winger: "Down with JK rowling and <insert right-wing anti-lgbt nonsense>"
- right winger: "I just said down with pedophiles. Telling that you took that as an insult to your politics."
-
Agree with antifascist stuff. Just nitpicking the fascist idiot's idiotic words: what the hell is an example of a non-politically-motivated assassination?? isn't every assassination politically motivated?
Often, I think being an important person or person in position of power is an important factor that makes it different than just a murder.
-
This post did not contain any content.
And I cast that wish at level 9
Well no duh. It's a level 9 spell. Can't cast it lower than that.
-
Riegel could have done better here; his comeback isn't really that smart. See, this same script works exactly the same in reverse:
- right winger: "Down with pedophiles!"
- left winger: "Down with JK rowling and <insert right-wing anti-lgbt nonsense>"
- right winger: "I just said down with pedophiles. Telling that you took that as an insult to your politics."
The bit about calling sam out and down with lies makes it pretty clear that he views it as a counter attack
-
Either one taken to its extreme ends with some sort of despotism. You really need both working together to keep each other in check.
feel free to prove that point. it is insane. capitalism has never worked for the people, in any country. whereas socialism has worked by itself and for the people very well. the red scare propaganda of "big bad communism" is a hoax. but besides that, the western states had to kill many socialist leaders and destablize many socialist countries (please read about it, its disgusting) to make them seem "unable to work".
-
The bit about calling sam out and down with lies makes it pretty clear that he views it as a counter attack
Well yeah, obviously. The right wing, regardless of whether they consider themselves fascist or not, are obviously aware that left is going to call them out for being fascists. Just as I'm aware that when right-wing people say "pedophiles" they likely are talking about queer people. It's not going to go over anyone's head.
-
Agree with antifascist stuff. Just nitpicking the fascist idiot's idiotic words: what the hell is an example of a non-politically-motivated assassination?? isn't every assassination politically motivated?
isn’t every assassination politically motivated?
We can go further and describe everything we do and every way in which we interact with others as "politically motivated" because politics is literally just dealing with someone else. If there were two people left on earth, there would be politics. If there was only one person left, there would finally be no politics.
And that's my platform when I run: no more politics 2028! lets gooooo!
-
Riegel could have done better here; his comeback isn't really that smart. See, this same script works exactly the same in reverse:
- right winger: "Down with pedophiles!"
- left winger: "Down with JK rowling and <insert right-wing anti-lgbt nonsense>"
- right winger: "I just said down with pedophiles. Telling that you took that as an insult to your politics."
wrote on last edited by [email protected]Your counter-example doesn't make sense.
In the picture in this post, the person who read the "down with fascism" message expressed disappointment with the person's message, thus revealing that they are associating fascism with their own political leaning.
In your example, the left-winger just mentions a name of someone else they don't like in response, which isn't even connected to the topic.
You're missing the point that certain political ideologies have very strong connections with each other. Except one side is arguably connected to many much worse terms.
You can say "down with authoritarian marxists!" and you might get a few tankies to pipe up and say "wow I can't believe you are attacking the glorious people's blah blah blah" to which you can say "aha called out your politics!" but nobody really takes tankies seriously anyway nor are they a threat to modern nation-building the same way they were a century or two ago.
-
Your counter-example doesn't make sense.
In the picture in this post, the person who read the "down with fascism" message expressed disappointment with the person's message, thus revealing that they are associating fascism with their own political leaning.
In your example, the left-winger just mentions a name of someone else they don't like in response, which isn't even connected to the topic.
You're missing the point that certain political ideologies have very strong connections with each other. Except one side is arguably connected to many much worse terms.
You can say "down with authoritarian marxists!" and you might get a few tankies to pipe up and say "wow I can't believe you are attacking the glorious people's blah blah blah" to which you can say "aha called out your politics!" but nobody really takes tankies seriously anyway nor are they a threat to modern nation-building the same way they were a century or two ago.
It doesn't matter that we're correct that right-wingers are fascists while they're wrong that we're pedophiles. The rhetoric works exactly the same in either case.
As I responded to the other commenter, right-wingers are obviously well aware that left-wingers will call them fascists, even if they do not consider themselves fascist and hold a negative perspective of fascism. I consider pedophiles bad but I'm aware that right-wing people are going to call me one just because I'm gay.
In a flipped conversation, where the third commenter is a right-winger who says "look, you didn't deny being a pedophile!," I'm sure they would take a screenshot of the conversation and post it to twitter and get lots of upvotes since that looks like such an own. They'd probably even say they can tell by my disappointment that I was implicitly acknowledging I'm a pedophile.
If your clever comeback sounds exactly as smooth coming out of the enemy's mouth, it's not a very good comeback.
-
It doesn't matter that we're correct that right-wingers are fascists while they're wrong that we're pedophiles. The rhetoric works exactly the same in either case.
As I responded to the other commenter, right-wingers are obviously well aware that left-wingers will call them fascists, even if they do not consider themselves fascist and hold a negative perspective of fascism. I consider pedophiles bad but I'm aware that right-wing people are going to call me one just because I'm gay.
In a flipped conversation, where the third commenter is a right-winger who says "look, you didn't deny being a pedophile!," I'm sure they would take a screenshot of the conversation and post it to twitter and get lots of upvotes since that looks like such an own. They'd probably even say they can tell by my disappointment that I was implicitly acknowledging I'm a pedophile.
If your clever comeback sounds exactly as smooth coming out of the enemy's mouth, it's not a very good comeback.
I'm arguing that your example isn't communicating your thesis very well, and I don't think I'm alone in that feeling, but I'm doing the courtesy of letting you know that it's not connecting and why.
-
isn’t every assassination politically motivated?
We can go further and describe everything we do and every way in which we interact with others as "politically motivated" because politics is literally just dealing with someone else. If there were two people left on earth, there would be politics. If there was only one person left, there would finally be no politics.
And that's my platform when I run: no more politics 2028! lets gooooo!
I don't know what level of irony you're on, but seriously, isn't the political motivation what makes it different from a (paid) murder?
-
isn’t every assassination politically motivated?
We can go further and describe everything we do and every way in which we interact with others as "politically motivated" because politics is literally just dealing with someone else. If there were two people left on earth, there would be politics. If there was only one person left, there would finally be no politics.
And that's my platform when I run: no more politics 2028! lets gooooo!
Honestly yeah. My understanding of politics is power dynamics, which is just built into everything
-
I don't know what level of irony you're on, but seriously, isn't the political motivation what makes it different from a (paid) murder?
"Political motivation" is just the term we use to describe something that happened that we haven't codified into law yet because it hasn't become the widespread, social norm.
-
Assassination of passion.
I suddenly realised I don't actually know the difference of somebody being murdered or assassinated. I searched it, turns out there's various definitions. Most have either sneaky-peaky or prominent (political?) meanings.
-
Then you don't need to specify what level it's cast at, it's level 9 by default. Get outnerded
It's wish. There are no level modifiers. At least not back when I played. A wish of a wish. 17th level wizard or 34th level wizard makes no difference.
