You'll never see them again
-
Back when you had TV on a specific schedule, you were forced to watch things as they were. If a show was clunky, well you didn't have much choice in the matter, it was watch that or change channel or go outside.
With on-demand stuff, you can just completely skip over stuff you might actually like because the first few episodes are clunky. Why should I watch something clunky when I have the choice to watch something I know is good from the start?
...I'm still not watching One Piece though, I don't care how good it gets later.
I read One Piece and I like it. Yes, I don't recommend starting.
-
they don't know that I'm watching
They do if you're streaming. If you're pirating, then you're worthless.
-
We should start our own streaming service
With blackjack, and hookers!
-
With blackjack, and hookers!
forget the blackjack!
-
Didn't know the name, but knew the shows. What an unfortunate piece of shit he is.
damn. I'm gonna miss IT crowd in that case
-
I hate when they release streaming shows one episode per week. I am not going to watch it until it’s done and I catch up on other shows. Stop trying to get me to watch weekly, it’s not going to happen. That’s just not how people watch tv anymore.
So a new show to me is new for a solid year before i can get to it sometimes. So many times a show gets cancelled before I can watch it and half the time I lose interest once I know it’s cancelled
I prefer it that way, because if all the episodes are available at the same time I would just binge it, which always makes me feel bad.
-
Is this a real thing?
Not yet, but at the rate things are going...
-
There is a weird inverse relationship between how long audiences will wait to give a show a chance, and how long execs (specifically Netflix) will give the show.
I think there must be more to the Netflix example. Maybe they are monitoring other data points like web searches or show mentions on fora to quantify buzz and work out if the show has hit potential with target markets. Either that or they get some new opportunity for creative accounting with each show.
It's capitalism. Unverified, but I've heard it explained as a result of tracking growth through new subscribers. Keeping around an old show won't drive new subscribers unless it's a huge show that generates a lot of buzz. New shows have a better chance of appealing to people who aren't already subscribers. So they cancel the old one and start up another new show instead.
-
It's capitalism. Unverified, but I've heard it explained as a result of tracking growth through new subscribers. Keeping around an old show won't drive new subscribers unless it's a huge show that generates a lot of buzz. New shows have a better chance of appealing to people who aren't already subscribers. So they cancel the old one and start up another new show instead.
That makes a lot of sense
-
TNG, Voyager... Rough first seasons leading to excellent series
Star Gate Universe finally hit its stride in its final season but too late to prevent cancelation
-
This post did not contain any content.
marvel: "here's what you wanted"
us: "kys"
-
TNG, Voyager... Rough first seasons leading to excellent series
Really Star Trek in general....
