Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

agnos.is Forums

  1. Home
  2. Technology
  3. Would it be possible for a browser or extension to just provide false metadata in order to subvert this type of fingerprinting?

Would it be possible for a browser or extension to just provide false metadata in order to subvert this type of fingerprinting?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Technology
16 Posts 11 Posters 20 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • Z [email protected]

    Would it be possible for a browser or extension to just provide false metadata in order to subvert this type of fingerprinting?

    jackattack@lemmy.dbzer0.comJ This user is from outside of this forum
    jackattack@lemmy.dbzer0.comJ This user is from outside of this forum
    [email protected]
    wrote on last edited by
    #2

    So from what I understand, theres 2 common ways that browsers combat this. Someone add to or correct me if I'm wrong.

    1. Browsers such as Mull combat this by looking the same as every other browser. If you all look the same, it's hard to tell you apart.

    2. Browsers such as Brave randomize metadata that fingerprinting collects so that it's more difficult to piece it all together and build a trend/profile on someone.

    These aren't the only options, these are just ones I've read about recently. Online behavior, browswr window size, and I'm sure so much more also goes into it. But every little bit helps and is better than nothing.

    M D 2 Replies Last reply
    0
    • jackattack@lemmy.dbzer0.comJ [email protected]

      So from what I understand, theres 2 common ways that browsers combat this. Someone add to or correct me if I'm wrong.

      1. Browsers such as Mull combat this by looking the same as every other browser. If you all look the same, it's hard to tell you apart.

      2. Browsers such as Brave randomize metadata that fingerprinting collects so that it's more difficult to piece it all together and build a trend/profile on someone.

      These aren't the only options, these are just ones I've read about recently. Online behavior, browswr window size, and I'm sure so much more also goes into it. But every little bit helps and is better than nothing.

      M This user is from outside of this forum
      M This user is from outside of this forum
      [email protected]
      wrote on last edited by
      #3

      Mull is discontinued unfortunately, although I think it got forked?

      S jackattack@lemmy.dbzer0.comJ M Y 4 Replies Last reply
      0
      • M [email protected]

        Mull is discontinued unfortunately, although I think it got forked?

        S This user is from outside of this forum
        S This user is from outside of this forum
        [email protected]
        wrote on last edited by
        #4

        Fennec is similar and is maintained

        There is a fork of mull too

        S 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • M [email protected]

          Mull is discontinued unfortunately, although I think it got forked?

          jackattack@lemmy.dbzer0.comJ This user is from outside of this forum
          jackattack@lemmy.dbzer0.comJ This user is from outside of this forum
          [email protected]
          wrote on last edited by
          #5

          Yeah maybe Tor Browser was the better example. Just trying to get the point out lol.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • M [email protected]

            Mull is discontinued unfortunately, although I think it got forked?

            M This user is from outside of this forum
            M This user is from outside of this forum
            [email protected]
            wrote on last edited by
            #6

            For mobile, mullvad (from the actual VPN folk) for desktop still exists.

            ulrich@feddit.orgU 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • Z [email protected]

              Would it be possible for a browser or extension to just provide false metadata in order to subvert this type of fingerprinting?

              ulrich@feddit.orgU This user is from outside of this forum
              ulrich@feddit.orgU This user is from outside of this forum
              [email protected]
              wrote on last edited by
              #7

              Yes but that metadata is also used to serve you the webpage, so if you spoof it, the page may not load properly.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • M [email protected]

                For mobile, mullvad (from the actual VPN folk) for desktop still exists.

                ulrich@feddit.orgU This user is from outside of this forum
                ulrich@feddit.orgU This user is from outside of this forum
                [email protected]
                wrote on last edited by
                #8

                Mullvad browser and Mull were not affiliated.

                M 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • ulrich@feddit.orgU [email protected]

                  Mullvad browser and Mull were not affiliated.

                  M This user is from outside of this forum
                  M This user is from outside of this forum
                  [email protected]
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #9

                  That's why I said (from the actual vpn folk)

                  The two were often conflated because "mull" in the name. They also used many of the same resources for the prefs.js and other tweaks. (Arkenfox, tor uplift, etc)

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • Z [email protected]

                    Would it be possible for a browser or extension to just provide false metadata in order to subvert this type of fingerprinting?

                    K This user is from outside of this forum
                    K This user is from outside of this forum
                    [email protected]
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #10

                    Yes. There is a firefox extension called Chameleon that does this.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • Z [email protected]

                      Would it be possible for a browser or extension to just provide false metadata in order to subvert this type of fingerprinting?

                      F This user is from outside of this forum
                      F This user is from outside of this forum
                      [email protected]
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #11

                      Others have mentioned what Firefox/etc do, but another option is a PiHole. If you can't look up the IP for an advertiser URL, you don't load the JavaScript to begin with.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • Z [email protected]

                        Would it be possible for a browser or extension to just provide false metadata in order to subvert this type of fingerprinting?

                        D This user is from outside of this forum
                        D This user is from outside of this forum
                        [email protected]
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #12

                        No. Anything that executes Javascript will be fingerprinted.

                        That being said it depends who are you fighting. For common commercial tools like Cloudflare fingerprinter it might work to some extent but if you want to safeguard against more sophisticated fingerprinting then TOR and no JS is the only way to combat this.

                        The issue is that browsers are so incredibly complex that it's impossible to patch everything and you'll just end up getting infinite captchas and break your browsing experience.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • jackattack@lemmy.dbzer0.comJ [email protected]

                          So from what I understand, theres 2 common ways that browsers combat this. Someone add to or correct me if I'm wrong.

                          1. Browsers such as Mull combat this by looking the same as every other browser. If you all look the same, it's hard to tell you apart.

                          2. Browsers such as Brave randomize metadata that fingerprinting collects so that it's more difficult to piece it all together and build a trend/profile on someone.

                          These aren't the only options, these are just ones I've read about recently. Online behavior, browswr window size, and I'm sure so much more also goes into it. But every little bit helps and is better than nothing.

                          D This user is from outside of this forum
                          D This user is from outside of this forum
                          [email protected]
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #13

                          The first point is flawed and even TOR doesn't execute javascript because it's impossible to catch everything when you give the server full code running capabilities.

                          The second point is more plausible but there's an incredible amount of work to do to fix this. Like, needing to rework browser engines from ground up and removing all of the legacy cruft. Brave is not capable of this and never will be no matter what they advertise because it doesn't have it's own engine.

                          That being said, these tools will get you quite far against commercial fingerprint products especially ones used for Ads but that will also ruin your browser experience as now you're just solving captchas everywhere 🫠

                          jackattack@lemmy.dbzer0.comJ 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • M [email protected]

                            Mull is discontinued unfortunately, although I think it got forked?

                            Y This user is from outside of this forum
                            Y This user is from outside of this forum
                            [email protected]
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #14

                            Yep. It's fork is called ironfox

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • S [email protected]

                              Fennec is similar and is maintained

                              There is a fork of mull too

                              S This user is from outside of this forum
                              S This user is from outside of this forum
                              [email protected]
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #15

                              I went back to Fennec. We'll see if a fork survives long term.

                              I just want Firefox on F-Droid, and Fennec has been that for years. I only switched because I got a new phone and figured I'd try Mull.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • D [email protected]

                                The first point is flawed and even TOR doesn't execute javascript because it's impossible to catch everything when you give the server full code running capabilities.

                                The second point is more plausible but there's an incredible amount of work to do to fix this. Like, needing to rework browser engines from ground up and removing all of the legacy cruft. Brave is not capable of this and never will be no matter what they advertise because it doesn't have it's own engine.

                                That being said, these tools will get you quite far against commercial fingerprint products especially ones used for Ads but that will also ruin your browser experience as now you're just solving captchas everywhere 🫠

                                jackattack@lemmy.dbzer0.comJ This user is from outside of this forum
                                jackattack@lemmy.dbzer0.comJ This user is from outside of this forum
                                [email protected]
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #16

                                Thanks for adding! Could you clarify a bit on the points so I can better understand where I was wrong at?

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • System shared this topic on
                                Reply
                                • Reply as topic
                                Log in to reply
                                • Oldest to Newest
                                • Newest to Oldest
                                • Most Votes


                                • Login

                                • Login or register to search.
                                • First post
                                  Last post
                                0
                                • Categories
                                • Recent
                                • Tags
                                • Popular
                                • World
                                • Users
                                • Groups