So proud!
-
See, I just want to answer your question, but you just seem to want to play this little game.
Alright then. So ctrl-f of "example" doesn't show you asking me for an example of anything.
Guess we need to start at the top to see if you're using some other words to mean "give me an example of X".
Yeah and I’m asking them to use their definition in comparison, how exactly is saying “he’s mansplaining” substantially different then “dei hire”.
Is it that?
wrote last edited by [email protected]I don't want to play this game. Do the words "either way go away" in some way express enjoyment or contentment to pursue the conversation? This is why I say you have a rapist mentality.
You're being willfully obtuse or you're an actual moron you're honestly making it kinda hard to determine.
I'll restate this again according to you.
Bill explained baseball to me condescendingly.
Bill mansplained baseball to me.
These are the same sentence, neither is more insulting than the other, neither is sexist though it refers derogatorily to one sex specifically.
-
I don't want to play this game. Do the words "either way go away" in some way express enjoyment or contentment to pursue the conversation? This is why I say you have a rapist mentality.
You're being willfully obtuse or you're an actual moron you're honestly making it kinda hard to determine.
I'll restate this again according to you.
Bill explained baseball to me condescendingly.
Bill mansplained baseball to me.
These are the same sentence, neither is more insulting than the other, neither is sexist though it refers derogatorily to one sex specifically.
I’ll restate this again according to you.
Bill explained baseball to me condescendingly.
Bill mansplained baseball to me.
These are the same sentence, neither is more insulting than the other, neither is sexist though it refers derogatorily to one sex specifically.
Wrong. Would you like me to link you directly to where I defined mansplaining as being "misogynistically condescending"? I'm happy to do that instead of linking to a random comment in the thread and insisting that it's there somewhere.
-
I’ll restate this again according to you.
Bill explained baseball to me condescendingly.
Bill mansplained baseball to me.
These are the same sentence, neither is more insulting than the other, neither is sexist though it refers derogatorily to one sex specifically.
Wrong. Would you like me to link you directly to where I defined mansplaining as being "misogynistically condescending"? I'm happy to do that instead of linking to a random comment in the thread and insisting that it's there somewhere.
You completely skipped over the go away part so you can play this dumb fuckin game.
Then what's your argument if you agree it's misogynistic then you agree it's sexist at which point what is your disagreement aside from you being apparently generally disagreeable and apparently unavailable to leave me alone.
-
You completely skipped over the go away part so you can play this dumb fuckin game.
Then what's your argument if you agree it's misogynistic then you agree it's sexist at which point what is your disagreement aside from you being apparently generally disagreeable and apparently unavailable to leave me alone.
wrote last edited by [email protected]You completely skipped over the go away part so you can play this dumb fuckin game.
I didn't think you needed my permission to tuck your tail between your legs and run away. But you have it: you're totally free to stop replying whenever you want.
Then what’s your argument if you agree it’s misogynistic
I'm saying you're wrong that I equate these 2:
Bill explained baseball to me condescendingly.
Bill mansplained baseball to me.
The first would have to be "Bill explained baseball to me in a misogynistically condescending way"
-
You completely skipped over the go away part so you can play this dumb fuckin game.
I didn't think you needed my permission to tuck your tail between your legs and run away. But you have it: you're totally free to stop replying whenever you want.
Then what’s your argument if you agree it’s misogynistic
I'm saying you're wrong that I equate these 2:
Bill explained baseball to me condescendingly.
Bill mansplained baseball to me.
The first would have to be "Bill explained baseball to me in a misogynistically condescending way"
Ya huh rationalize it however you'd like.
-
Ya huh rationalize it however you'd like.
So you're saying a woman using this sentence would be a bigot/misandrist?
"Bill explained baseball to me in a misogynistically condescending way"
-
So you're saying a woman using this sentence would be a bigot/misandrist?
"Bill explained baseball to me in a misogynistically condescending way"
Bud. We talked about this, read the comments. I'm not your mommy and this ain't story time.
You agree with me you're just being argumentative.
Stop and let your brain catch up with your mouth while you do some reading and reflecting.
Either way.
Go.
Away.
-
Bud. We talked about this, read the comments. I'm not your mommy and this ain't story time.
You agree with me you're just being argumentative.
Stop and let your brain catch up with your mouth while you do some reading and reflecting.
Either way.
Go.
Away.
read the comments
I did. Based on them, your answer would be: Yes. You think a woman using this sentence would be a bigot/misandrist: “Bill explained baseball to me in a misogynistically condescending way”.
Is that correct?
-
read the comments
I did. Based on them, your answer would be: Yes. You think a woman using this sentence would be a bigot/misandrist: “Bill explained baseball to me in a misogynistically condescending way”.
Is that correct?
Bless your heart.
-
Bless your heart.
Okay, so we can assume that's a yes then.
So again, to rewind waaaaaayyyyy back: pretty wild that you're comfortable calling women bigots for calling out one of the most common forms of misogyny they experience.
Real incel-level take, but you do you.
-
Okay, so we can assume that's a yes then.
So again, to rewind waaaaaayyyyy back: pretty wild that you're comfortable calling women bigots for calling out one of the most common forms of misogyny they experience.
Real incel-level take, but you do you.
Real incel-level take, but you do you.
Ya huh, and go away means be more persistent. I'm sure that toxic behavior doesn't stay here. No means no if you needed a reminder.
-
Real incel-level take, but you do you.
Ya huh, and go away means be more persistent. I'm sure that toxic behavior doesn't stay here. No means no if you needed a reminder.
Help! Help! I'm being forced to engage in an argument I can literally stop having at any time!
Lol.
-
Help! Help! I'm being forced to engage in an argument I can literally stop having at any time!
Lol.
That's nice dear
-
That's nice dear
Thanks. Any other anti-women takes of yours you want to share with the room? I think it's best we get them all out there.
-
Thanks. Any other anti-women takes of yours you want to share with the room? I think it's best we get them all out there.
Oh now I'm a sexist, I'd to hear that story if you're going to talk at me anyway.
-
We've done this, you're rehashing your stupid argument again.
Max depth reached.
Oh now I’m a sexist, I’d to hear that story if you’re going to talk at me anyway.
Sure, it starts here: https://lemmy.nullspace.lol/comment/61891
-
Max depth reached.
Oh now I’m a sexist, I’d to hear that story if you’re going to talk at me anyway.
Sure, it starts here: https://lemmy.nullspace.lol/comment/61891
wrote last edited by [email protected]No no no, be specific you spent half a day crying about how important it is to directly quote people.
Similarly what sex am i? Though I do love how you peeled back that mask to reveal you are indeed a bigoted nitwit.
-
Yes the way they defined is use requires someone to know the intent of the speaker which means they know them or they're simply assuming and my assertion is that isn't substantially different then assuming someone doesn't know something because of their sex.
And you can call someone bigoted for saying something in a way that makes you feel uncomfortable solely based on their sex. I don't see the difference.
you’re comfortable calling women bigots for calling out one of the most common forms of misogyny they experience.
-
you’re comfortable calling women bigots for calling out one of the most common forms of misogyny they experience.
wrote last edited by [email protected]Lol that's your proof I'm "anti-woman", neat. It's good to know you're only pursuing arguments you've already agreed aren't what you're claiming they are.
Go away troll.
-
Lol that's your proof I'm "anti-woman", neat. It's good to know you're only pursuing arguments you've already agreed aren't what you're claiming they are.
Go away troll.
Where did I agree to that?