Haters BTFO
-
This post did not contain any content.
-
This post did not contain any content.wrote last edited by [email protected]
If that's all it takes to refute it, then the argument had no value and the frog/wojak was warranted!
-
If that's all it takes to refute it, then the argument had no value and the frog/wojak was warranted!
wrote last edited by [email protected]A wojak image can't really refute anything; it's just depicting the original poster as being a seething dumbass (an ad hominem response). If the poster accompanies said wojak image with a counterargument, that could refute something, but most wojak responses don't bother with actually making any kind of salient point. Which is why it's such a popular format: it's low effort.
Edit: Realizing the error in my argument, I have included the following addendum:
-
A wojak image can't really refute anything; it's just depicting the original poster as being a seething dumbass (an ad hominem response). If the poster accompanies said wojak image with a counterargument, that could refute something, but most wojak responses don't bother with actually making any kind of salient point. Which is why it's such a popular format: it's low effort.
Edit: Realizing the error in my argument, I have included the following addendum:
-
HOLD ME NOW
