Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

agnos.is Forums

  1. Home
  2. World News
  3. Bill Gates to give away $200 billion by 2045, says Musk is 'killing' world's poorest children

Bill Gates to give away $200 billion by 2045, says Musk is 'killing' world's poorest children

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved World News
10 Posts 8 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • remington@beehaw.orgR This user is from outside of this forum
    remington@beehaw.orgR This user is from outside of this forum
    [email protected]
    wrote last edited by
    #1
    This post did not contain any content.
    D arscynic@beehaw.orgA powderhorn@beehaw.orgP lemmie689@lemmy.sdf.orgL 4 Replies Last reply
    1
    35
    • System shared this topic
    • remington@beehaw.orgR [email protected]
      This post did not contain any content.
      D This user is from outside of this forum
      D This user is from outside of this forum
      [email protected]
      wrote last edited by
      #2

      I would like a small percentage of this. Hey just say, one percent.

      I'm not greedy and I'm not too good at maths.

      M 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • remington@beehaw.orgR [email protected]
        This post did not contain any content.
        arscynic@beehaw.orgA This user is from outside of this forum
        arscynic@beehaw.orgA This user is from outside of this forum
        [email protected]
        wrote last edited by
        #3

        Bollocks. If these rich assholes felt guilty and inclined towards altruism they'd have spent it already instead of "pledging".

        "[…] Furthermore, their supposed philanthropy isn't just them giving money away no-questions-asked. More often than not they aim to benefit their coffers and/or virtue signal their “conscience”:

        • “They are moving away from unfettered, no-strings-attached giving and toward increased donor control over organizations, and are blurring the lines between private investment and public benefit.” —Gilded Giving 2020, by Chuck Collins and Helen Flannery [17].

        • “Your "Giving Pledge" has a loophole that renders it practically worthless, namely permitting pledgees to simply name charities in their wills. I have found that most billionaires or near billionaires hate giving large sums of money away while alive and instead set up family-controlled foundations to do it for them after death. And these foundations become, more often than not, bureaucracy-ridden sluggards. These rich are delighted to toss off a few million a year in order to remain socially acceptable. But that's it.” —Robert Wilson to Bill Gates, 2010 [18] […]" —What if I paid for all my free software? | arscyni.cc

        johnedwa@sopuli.xyzJ 1 Reply Last reply
        10
        • D [email protected]

          I would like a small percentage of this. Hey just say, one percent.

          I'm not greedy and I'm not too good at maths.

          M This user is from outside of this forum
          M This user is from outside of this forum
          [email protected]
          wrote last edited by [email protected]
          #4

          I would be fine for the rest of my life with 0,005% (10 million €)

          saik0shinigami@lemmy.saik0.comS 1 Reply Last reply
          2
          • remington@beehaw.orgR [email protected]
            This post did not contain any content.
            powderhorn@beehaw.orgP This user is from outside of this forum
            powderhorn@beehaw.orgP This user is from outside of this forum
            [email protected]
            wrote last edited by
            #5

            Here's a crazy thought: How about paying people living wages instead of grabbing a megaphone and talking about the good you're doing for the world? Not that MS paid poorly (I worked for them back in college as an orange badge [contractor]), but a stitch in time, as they say, saves nine.

            I believe Gates and Buffet are sincere. Musk, on the other hand ...

            1 Reply Last reply
            15
            • remington@beehaw.orgR [email protected]
              This post did not contain any content.
              lemmie689@lemmy.sdf.orgL This user is from outside of this forum
              lemmie689@lemmy.sdf.orgL This user is from outside of this forum
              [email protected]
              wrote last edited by
              #6

              The Nobel switcheroo, look what a saint I am.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • M [email protected]

                I would be fine for the rest of my life with 0,005% (10 million €)

                saik0shinigami@lemmy.saik0.comS This user is from outside of this forum
                saik0shinigami@lemmy.saik0.comS This user is from outside of this forum
                [email protected]
                wrote last edited by
                #7

                High yield savings is currently at 4.66% at best right now...

                With just 1 million in a bank account... That's 47k a year in interest. Considering that I don't need to work in this scenario (And thus wouldn't need a car, and all the other costs that come with needing to maintain stuff for a job)... I could probably make that work for the rest of my life.

                D 1 Reply Last reply
                1
                • saik0shinigami@lemmy.saik0.comS [email protected]

                  High yield savings is currently at 4.66% at best right now...

                  With just 1 million in a bank account... That's 47k a year in interest. Considering that I don't need to work in this scenario (And thus wouldn't need a car, and all the other costs that come with needing to maintain stuff for a job)... I could probably make that work for the rest of my life.

                  D This user is from outside of this forum
                  D This user is from outside of this forum
                  [email protected]
                  wrote last edited by
                  #8

                  At the risk of sounding sexist or misogynist, you could make it work unless you have a wife......oh dear.

                  saik0shinigami@lemmy.saik0.comS 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • D [email protected]

                    At the risk of sounding sexist or misogynist, you could make it work unless you have a wife......oh dear.

                    saik0shinigami@lemmy.saik0.comS This user is from outside of this forum
                    saik0shinigami@lemmy.saik0.comS This user is from outside of this forum
                    [email protected]
                    wrote last edited by [email protected]
                    #9

                    I do have a wife. I pulled up our current budget and looked. We'd have to cut a couple of things but I could make it work pretty easily. It's the kids that would make it actually hard. But at this point they're spoiled enough. They'll live (they can live without food right?)

                    Edit: missed an entire word.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    1
                    • arscynic@beehaw.orgA [email protected]

                      Bollocks. If these rich assholes felt guilty and inclined towards altruism they'd have spent it already instead of "pledging".

                      "[…] Furthermore, their supposed philanthropy isn't just them giving money away no-questions-asked. More often than not they aim to benefit their coffers and/or virtue signal their “conscience”:

                      • “They are moving away from unfettered, no-strings-attached giving and toward increased donor control over organizations, and are blurring the lines between private investment and public benefit.” —Gilded Giving 2020, by Chuck Collins and Helen Flannery [17].

                      • “Your "Giving Pledge" has a loophole that renders it practically worthless, namely permitting pledgees to simply name charities in their wills. I have found that most billionaires or near billionaires hate giving large sums of money away while alive and instead set up family-controlled foundations to do it for them after death. And these foundations become, more often than not, bureaucracy-ridden sluggards. These rich are delighted to toss off a few million a year in order to remain socially acceptable. But that's it.” —Robert Wilson to Bill Gates, 2010 [18] […]" —What if I paid for all my free software? | arscyni.cc

                      johnedwa@sopuli.xyzJ This user is from outside of this forum
                      johnedwa@sopuli.xyzJ This user is from outside of this forum
                      [email protected]
                      wrote last edited by [email protected]
                      #10

                      Gates has donated over 100 billion already.
                      That's a bit more than "tossing a few million a year".

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      3
                      Reply
                      • Reply as topic
                      Log in to reply
                      • Oldest to Newest
                      • Newest to Oldest
                      • Most Votes


                      • Login

                      • Login or register to search.
                      • First post
                        Last post
                      0
                      • Categories
                      • Recent
                      • Tags
                      • Popular
                      • World
                      • Users
                      • Groups