From Snoop Dogg to Lap Dogg
-
I saw the video and he's like "I can't explain that" I mean.. there's time dilation and other, weirder stuff in the film, that didn't bother him? lol
"Adoption". It's not that fucking hard Snoop!
-
a reason not to smoke excessively you mean.
Snoop's stupid comments here? I don't think we can blame the weed for that.
-
I saw the video and he's like "I can't explain that" I mean.. there's time dilation and other, weirder stuff in the film, that didn't bother him? lol
I can't explain that
Two people.lovr each other, the end
-
I've known quite a few older people who were lifetime pot smokers. They all ended up just a little fucked in the head. So much so I quit. Its a myth that pot makes you creative. I figured out how to be chill without it and the ideas I have now really work. While some people I know in my age group who still lean into it are not able to figure out or see the simplest of solutions. Its noticeable and I wish there was some way to study the long term cognitive decline of lifetime smokers. Dude can't explain how love is love. That its a personal choice everyone gets to make. Sounds like he doesn't want those kids to be free but be some version he has to approve of.
wrote last edited by [email protected]It's all starting to make sense. Excessive marijuana use makes people gravitate toward conservative ideology. Man are all those old hippies going to be upset when I give them the news.
Apparently I need to add this: /s
-
It's all starting to make sense. Excessive marijuana use makes people gravitate toward conservative ideology. Man are all those old hippies going to be upset when I give them the news.
Apparently I need to add this: /s
theyre gonna feel so dumb for not gravitating toward conservative ideology then we all laugh because it proves they were fake tokers
-
If homophobia surprises you then you haven’t listened to rap music of his era.
seriously. even the most forward thinking popular rap group (a tribe called quest) had a (unreleased) song about how much they hate gay people
-
It's an abnormal relationship type with a dom and a sub. Just like homosexual relationships are abnormal relationships with non standard partners involved. One is just more abnormal than the other. Both raise questions about sex, as was the point with Snoops clip -- his kid explicitly asked about sex stuff, because he encountered the abnormal couple on screen. Snoop wasn't comfortable discussing that with his grandkid in a movie theatre, and felt put out. That's a valid response, no matter how many lgbtq+ people scream in nonsensical rage.
You may not like the point, but it doesn't make it invalid. Just like you may not like hetero people's reaction to homosexual content in kids media, but that doesn't make their reactions "wrong".
Also, my dude, gay relationships are normal they are just less common. They are not "abnormal". Words have subcontext attached to them. Throwing big words around while "agreeing" with people and watching them react negatively is probably your first indication that your communication needs work.
-
If this is real, he's lost all street cred.
Based Snoop
-
Also, my dude, gay relationships are normal they are just less common. They are not "abnormal". Words have subcontext attached to them. Throwing big words around while "agreeing" with people and watching them react negatively is probably your first indication that your communication needs work.
It's accurate to describe it as abnormal -- something that's less common deviates from what is normal, is abnormal. There's often a connection to abnormal things being 'worrying', and lgbtq+ stuff falls into that category for many as well -- case in point, Snoop. Few parents 'wish' their kids to be lgbtq+, it worries them, even if many will (hopefully) love their kids regardless. I reckon lemmy has a significant number of lgbtq+ people on it, which presents echo chamber bias. I still think it's important to voice dissenting opinions / views, even if it triggers a bunch of people -- so long as it's done in a generally neutral fashion. My communication skills feel ok to me, though some groan that I write longer posts. Sure, I often have people post ad hominem type insults / personal attacks against things I post, but I rarely respond back attacking the personality/character of those folks (admittedly, I've been more lax lately).
Sorta like how there are seemingly a lot of FN people in many of the Canadian subs. Most/many of the articles that get posted there are primarily about FN topics, with FN bias. While I know my views on FN issues are not "in line" with the FN narrative, I still think it's important to highlight things in a mostly neutral manner, so that there's a diversity of opinions presented to the broader community. Without more diverse opinions displayed, it gives the wrong impression to readers of the general public opinion about various topics -- I doubt I really need to go on about the risks of echo chambers on social media.
-
Snoop's stupid comments here? I don't think we can blame the weed for that.
well several studies already came out with contradicting your comment otherwise.
-
This post did not contain any content.
The famously pious Snoop Dogg.
-
And thats problematic in just... So many fucking ways.
Like i genuinely dont even know where to start, but maybe: it feels a little homophobic, and also you're accepting the puritanical cultural framework of what is and isn't transgressive, that makes a drag queen reading books to kids more outrageous than avpriest fucking them.
no? i'm talking about a single person. i'm not generalising in any way.
nowhere did i state that any of the things he's done are wrong or right, simply that he has inconsistent beliefs. my own beliefs did not come into it.
-
no? i'm talking about a single person. i'm not generalising in any way.
nowhere did i state that any of the things he's done are wrong or right, simply that he has inconsistent beliefs. my own beliefs did not come into it.
What you center in discourse is part of the message tho.
-
What you center in discourse is part of the message tho.
elaborate.
-
About one thing she said out of racism about specifically him.
Also, if hes against queer shit, he cant choose his name. What's his real name?
Edit: downthread says its 'calvin broadus'. Mr. Broad<s needs to shut his stupid fucking mouth; no fasch cock for him to suck in that theater. Especially not in front of his fucking grandkids.
What the fuck are you talking about?
-
It's all starting to make sense. Excessive marijuana use makes people gravitate toward conservative ideology. Man are all those old hippies going to be upset when I give them the news.
Apparently I need to add this: /s
If that makes sense to you then you don't know any lifelong pot smokers.
-
This post did not contain any content.wrote last edited by [email protected]
People don't become rich and famous by challenging hegemony and uplifting the oppressed.
-
I've known quite a few older people who were lifetime pot smokers. They all ended up just a little fucked in the head. So much so I quit. Its a myth that pot makes you creative. I figured out how to be chill without it and the ideas I have now really work. While some people I know in my age group who still lean into it are not able to figure out or see the simplest of solutions. Its noticeable and I wish there was some way to study the long term cognitive decline of lifetime smokers. Dude can't explain how love is love. That its a personal choice everyone gets to make. Sounds like he doesn't want those kids to be free but be some version he has to approve of.
Weed does not cause homophobia. Give me an effing break.
-
This post did not contain any content.
lmao ofc he's one of the racists caring a lot about gays and women rights when it comes to shitting on brown people. Cunt
-
Weed doesn't make you a bigoted piece of shit
You're the biggoted pos
