Why was there a pro-Hitler, Holocaust-denying ad on X?
-
This post did not contain any content.
Because X is owned by a pro-hitler probably Holocaust-denying shit heal.
-
This post did not contain any content.
Where else would one publish such an ad?
-
This post did not contain any content.
You know why. We all know why.
-
This post did not contain any content.
- spend millions to create laws to protect a genocidal entity working towards ethnic cleansing Palestinians from their lands.
- why Twitter have a Nazi and?
What do you expect from people who worked hard to support Zionist Nazi in their mission in genociding the Palestinians since WWII with historical knowing ties to Hitler, and allowing them to bluntly own all branches of government? It was evident at least since the attempt of ethnically cleansing Gaza that the US government and many fascist allies in Europe have no issue with white supremacy. They been actively and proudly stating their goals, but the American people got played with fake democracy until it reaches this moment.
-
It might seem trivial, but this stupid headline points to one reason Republicans have been winning. Everyone (notably journalists) still feels the need to "play the game" as they've always known it.
Oh, Candidate A said something? The game rules say you now have to run a quote in response from Candidate B.
But when Candidate B is an openly corrupt, lying, fascist, rapist shitpile who can't make it to the potty in time and is in the pocket of Russia, maybe take the fucking gloves off at some point and stop pretending you can or SHOULD be impartial. Here, watch:
Musk-Owned X Now Running Pro-Hitler, Holocaust-Denying Ads
You can and should have spicy reporting while remaining impartial. It takes more work to drum up the evidence, but that's what separates good reporting from great reporting.
-
Because X is owned by a pro-hitler probably Holocaust-denying shit heal.
*that did a Nazi salute.
-
This post did not contain any content.
What's up with the username (Nixon Groyper) ? I understand Groyper, but Nixon was a pretty okay president up until Watergate and very much not a Nazi.
I think it would've been funnier if the first name was Brandon, Andrew (Andrew Jackson and the trail of tears), or Franklin (FDR and Japanese Internment).
Maybe it's a serious ad though, but in that case, why pick Nixon?
-
This post did not contain any content.
You get 3 guesses.
-
Well, duh, where else would a pro-Hitler, Holocaust-denying ad be?
Alphabet and Meta might be at that point soon, with the way things are going.
-
You get 3 guesses.
-
Whatever that was the mods were quick to delete it. Almost too quick.
-
This post did not contain any content.
The world may never figure this out.
-
Got it in 1
-
- spend millions to create laws to protect a genocidal entity working towards ethnic cleansing Palestinians from their lands.
- why Twitter have a Nazi and?
What do you expect from people who worked hard to support Zionist Nazi in their mission in genociding the Palestinians since WWII with historical knowing ties to Hitler, and allowing them to bluntly own all branches of government? It was evident at least since the attempt of ethnically cleansing Gaza that the US government and many fascist allies in Europe have no issue with white supremacy. They been actively and proudly stating their goals, but the American people got played with fake democracy until it reaches this moment.
Seriously, my first thought was looking forward to the ADL explaining why smiling Hitler denying the Holocaust is not antisemitic since it isnt against Israel or something.
-
Because X is owned by a pro-hitler probably Holocaust-denying shit heal.
*shitheel
-
Well, duh, where else would a pro-Hitler, Holocaust-denying ad be?
Meta? Zuck has been extremely supportive of the nazis in power so far
-
Because X is owned by a pro-hitler probably Holocaust-denying shit heal.
He doesn't deny the holocaust. He sees it as a good idea.
-
I suggest you call the nearest mall and tell them you placed a bomb in there. It's just free speech, it's not like you actually put a bomb there, you're just saying it, so it's fine. If they don't like it they just can hang up and move on. I think it will be a totally fun and safe experience for you to try and that there will be absolutely no consequences for anyone involved, because that's how free speech works.
Or maybe, I don't know, you could pick someone you don't like and start telling people that they're a pedophile! It doesn't even have to be true, it's just free speech. You are free to say whatever you want! And if someone wanted to do the same thing to you, it should absolutely be their right to do so! Free speech for everyone! It's literally free!
Your example is bad faith, but I assume you know that already. If it isn't, then I really don't know if I can explain to someone that lacks mental acuity about over 50 years of case law on the subject. There is even more case law on libel & slander, but it sounds like reading isn't your forte. However, if you're capable of reading then I suggest you do so. But go on & pretend to be ignorant, or maybe you really are & if so then come back after you've actually read & studied the decisions by the courts and we can discuss what you think they got wrong.
-
Here's some free speech for you:
Fuck you, Nazi-enabler.
Clearly your emotions dictate any logic you might be capable of someday.
-
He doesn't deny the holocaust. He sees it as a good idea.
Nazis do both at the same time because they lie
