Bluesky Deletes AI Protest Video of Trump Sucking Musk's Toes, Calls It 'Non-Consensual Explicit Material'
-
Once again proving it isn't really decentralised.
-
fwiw they restored the post and blamed it on a moderator being too strict in applying a policy regarding non consensual ai porn. It’s objectively good they have policies banning such things but it was completely obvious from context that this was not meant to be pornographic at all
As such, one could easily read it with cynicism as responding to backlash as they only reviewed said moderators actions after this article came out and the associated clamor
-
yeah it's basically deepfake porn.
-
Only because I find these specific videos to be quite funny, maybe there can be a "satire/criticism of a public figure" exception that could exist
-
-
I'll just explain why that is a horrible idea with three simple letters:
A. O. C.
-
Fuck. Good point. Guess I'll just have to come to peace with me being a hypocrite when it comes to what I find acceptable.
-
Yeah. I think it was hilarious to "hack" government displays to show this in protest.
I am REALLY uncomfortable with sharing it on a wider basis. Because, at the risk of sounding like DNC leadership, it is opening a huge can of worms. Imagine if instead this was musk posting a deepfake of him and AOC similar to how he offered to rape taylor swift a while back?
-
First part yes, upload it anywhere and everywhere. Second part no, they're not required to leave it up and accept any legal liability, so just keep putting up new copies expecting they'll get removed.
-
just a lil evolution of the brojob
-
If this was AOC and MTG would the video still be up
-
Whose toes?
-
Where can I download a copy? I would upload it again, hate any sort of censorship?
-
It's not porn tho...not even a little bit.
-
Simple solution to all this crap:
MASTODON.
-
That's a pretty big loophole. I mean, imagine the same exact video with Kamala Harris and Nancy Pelosi. It takes a significantly different subtext when the subjects are women. But the subtext doesn't really matter to the morality of the act.
Either involuntary AI generated pornography is wrong or it isn't. I think it's wrong. Do Trump and Musk deserve it? Sure, but it's still wrong. Do I feel bad for them? No, because they deserve it. But it's still not something I would do, or suggest anyone else do, and if the creator is prosecuted, I'm not going to defend them.
-
oh it WILL happen on both sides. it's just going to be part of our lives now, and social media is fully justified in removing it from their platforms.
-
-
It is if you are into feet, lmao
-
Satire is already legal and right wingers have already called for her to be shot or worse and gotten away with it. Pandora's box isn't closed, it's long been open.
