Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

agnos.is Forums

  1. Home
  2. Technology
  3. Bluesky Deletes AI Protest Video of Trump Sucking Musk's Toes, Calls It 'Non-Consensual Explicit Material'

Bluesky Deletes AI Protest Video of Trump Sucking Musk's Toes, Calls It 'Non-Consensual Explicit Material'

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Technology
204 Posts 109 Posters 559 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • F [email protected]

    Bluesky deleted a viral, AI-generated protest video in which Donald Trump is sucking on Elon Musk’s toes because its moderators said it was “non-consensual explicit material.” The video was broadcast on televisions inside the office Housing and Urban Development earlier this week, and quickly went viral on Bluesky and Twitter.

    Independent journalist Marisa Kabas obtained a video from a government employee and posted it on Bluesky, where it went viral. Tuesday night, Bluesky moderators deleted the video because they said it was “non-consensual explicit material.”

    Other Bluesky users said that versions of the video they uploaded were also deleted, though it is still possible to find the video on the platform.

    Technically speaking, the AI video of Trump sucking Musk’s toes, which had the words “LONG LIVE THE REAL KING” shown on top of it, is a nonconsensual AI-generated video, because Trump and Musk did not agree to it. But social media platform content moderation policies have always had carve outs that allow for the criticism of powerful people, especially the world’s richest man and the literal president of the United States.

    For example, we once obtained Facebook’s internal rules about sexual content for content moderators, which included broad carveouts to allow for sexual content that criticized public figures and politicians. The First Amendment, which does not apply to social media companies but is relevant considering that Bluesky told Kabas she could not use the platform to “break the law,” has essentially unlimited protection for criticizing public figures in the way this video is doing.

    Content moderation has been one of Bluesky’s growing pains over the last few months. The platform has millions of users but only a few dozen employees, meaning that perfect content moderation is impossible, and a lot of it necessarily needs to be automated. This is going to lead to mistakes. But the video Kabas posted was one of the most popular posts on the platform earlier this week and resulted in a national conversation about the protest. Deleting it—whether accidentally or because its moderation rules are so strict as to not allow for this type of reporting on a protest against the President of the United States—is a problem.

    L This user is from outside of this forum
    L This user is from outside of this forum
    [email protected]
    wrote on last edited by
    #76

    Ah, the rewards of moderation: the best move is not to play.
    Fuck it is & has always been a better answer.
    Anarchy of the early internet was better than letting some paternalistic authority decide the right images & words to allow us to see, and decentralization isn't a bad idea.

    Yet the forward-thinking people of today know better and insist that with their brave, new moderation they'll paternalize better without stopping to acknowledge how horribly broken, arbitrary, & fallible that entire approach is.
    Instead of learning what we already knew, social media keeps repeating the same dumb mistakes.

    A N C R C 8 Replies Last reply
    0
    • S [email protected]

      My understanding is that BlueSky is distributed, meaning there's no single point of failure and nodes are independent. So scaling up should just mean adding more nodes, not having to scale vertically.

      Distributed computing is a form of decentralization where the goal is resilience of the platform, not decentralization of control. The goal is very different from the Fediverse, which is to decentralize control, with resilience being a nice side effect.

      Mastodon has technical barriers to that kind problem

      It also has technical barriers to widespread adoption, hence why BlueSky is winning. I'lf BlueSky fails, people will just go to whatever alternative has a healthy marketing budget and low barrier to entry.

      excrubulent@slrpnk.netE This user is from outside of this forum
      excrubulent@slrpnk.netE This user is from outside of this forum
      [email protected]
      wrote on last edited by
      #77

      It doesn't matter how distributed the servers are. You could say any centralised platform is "distributed" if it has at least one redundant server, which plenty of them do. Youtube has servers all over the world. That has nothing to do with enshittification and it's not the feature I was talking about.

      The thing that supposedly set bluesky apart was that they would be using a decentralised protocol that allowed anyone who wanted to to operate their own server with full control over their data. You can actually see some people posting from different domains.

      That's a nice idea and it trades on the rising popularity of the fediverse, but it's not doing it in an open manner because the software isn't open and separate instances are locked to 10 users maximum unless the central authority allows them more. That means it's not meaningfully decentralised, but it's still trying to capitalise on the concept.

      That's what I was referring to.,

      S 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • F [email protected]

        Bluesky deleted a viral, AI-generated protest video in which Donald Trump is sucking on Elon Musk’s toes because its moderators said it was “non-consensual explicit material.” The video was broadcast on televisions inside the office Housing and Urban Development earlier this week, and quickly went viral on Bluesky and Twitter.

        Independent journalist Marisa Kabas obtained a video from a government employee and posted it on Bluesky, where it went viral. Tuesday night, Bluesky moderators deleted the video because they said it was “non-consensual explicit material.”

        Other Bluesky users said that versions of the video they uploaded were also deleted, though it is still possible to find the video on the platform.

        Technically speaking, the AI video of Trump sucking Musk’s toes, which had the words “LONG LIVE THE REAL KING” shown on top of it, is a nonconsensual AI-generated video, because Trump and Musk did not agree to it. But social media platform content moderation policies have always had carve outs that allow for the criticism of powerful people, especially the world’s richest man and the literal president of the United States.

        For example, we once obtained Facebook’s internal rules about sexual content for content moderators, which included broad carveouts to allow for sexual content that criticized public figures and politicians. The First Amendment, which does not apply to social media companies but is relevant considering that Bluesky told Kabas she could not use the platform to “break the law,” has essentially unlimited protection for criticizing public figures in the way this video is doing.

        Content moderation has been one of Bluesky’s growing pains over the last few months. The platform has millions of users but only a few dozen employees, meaning that perfect content moderation is impossible, and a lot of it necessarily needs to be automated. This is going to lead to mistakes. But the video Kabas posted was one of the most popular posts on the platform earlier this week and resulted in a national conversation about the protest. Deleting it—whether accidentally or because its moderation rules are so strict as to not allow for this type of reporting on a protest against the President of the United States—is a problem.

        J This user is from outside of this forum
        J This user is from outside of this forum
        [email protected]
        wrote on last edited by
        #78

        Bluesky had better take care that they not act like other cowardly tech media

        F mitm0@lemmy.worldM 2 Replies Last reply
        0
        • excrubulent@slrpnk.netE [email protected]

          It doesn't matter how distributed the servers are. You could say any centralised platform is "distributed" if it has at least one redundant server, which plenty of them do. Youtube has servers all over the world. That has nothing to do with enshittification and it's not the feature I was talking about.

          The thing that supposedly set bluesky apart was that they would be using a decentralised protocol that allowed anyone who wanted to to operate their own server with full control over their data. You can actually see some people posting from different domains.

          That's a nice idea and it trades on the rising popularity of the fediverse, but it's not doing it in an open manner because the software isn't open and separate instances are locked to 10 users maximum unless the central authority allows them more. That means it's not meaningfully decentralised, but it's still trying to capitalise on the concept.

          That's what I was referring to.,

          S This user is from outside of this forum
          S This user is from outside of this forum
          [email protected]
          wrote on last edited by
          #79

          they would be using a decentralised protocol

          Well, they have that, they just haven't opened it up to others yet. A lot of it is open source today.

          I'm not saying BlueSky is ideal, just that it has a decentralized design and is currently quite distributed in practice. It's not like YouTube where it's largely just a CDN to keep things fast, but the core service is broken up into logical independent pieces instead of a top down system.

          They just currently control most of the pieces. But the design is still decentralized.

          excrubulent@slrpnk.netE 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • L [email protected]

            Ah, the rewards of moderation: the best move is not to play.
            Fuck it is & has always been a better answer.
            Anarchy of the early internet was better than letting some paternalistic authority decide the right images & words to allow us to see, and decentralization isn't a bad idea.

            Yet the forward-thinking people of today know better and insist that with their brave, new moderation they'll paternalize better without stopping to acknowledge how horribly broken, arbitrary, & fallible that entire approach is.
            Instead of learning what we already knew, social media keeps repeating the same dumb mistakes.

            A This user is from outside of this forum
            A This user is from outside of this forum
            [email protected]
            wrote on last edited by
            #80

            I had to hack an ex’s account once to get the revenge porn they posted of me taken down.

            There’s a balance at the end of the day.

            L 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • S [email protected]

              How so? Lemmy is technically decentralized and mods remove stuff here...

              robottoaster@mander.xyzR This user is from outside of this forum
              robottoaster@mander.xyzR This user is from outside of this forum
              [email protected]
              wrote on last edited by
              #81

              You can just move to another server and repost it.

              With blue sky there is no "another server"

              S 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • S [email protected]

                they would be using a decentralised protocol

                Well, they have that, they just haven't opened it up to others yet. A lot of it is open source today.

                I'm not saying BlueSky is ideal, just that it has a decentralized design and is currently quite distributed in practice. It's not like YouTube where it's largely just a CDN to keep things fast, but the core service is broken up into logical independent pieces instead of a top down system.

                They just currently control most of the pieces. But the design is still decentralized.

                excrubulent@slrpnk.netE This user is from outside of this forum
                excrubulent@slrpnk.netE This user is from outside of this forum
                [email protected]
                wrote on last edited by
                #82

                Right, my point is that they have the ingredients to meaningfully decentralise control, but until they do they are not meaningfully bettee than twitter, and it's just a branding exercise.

                Maybe they'll fix that, maybe they won't but until they do I think the fediverse's resilience proves that platforms will keep turning over until a viable federated system arises, whether that's bluesky, mastodon or something else.

                I can't even see where you disagree with this. You're just throwing out details withoit reference to how this affects my point.

                S 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • A [email protected]

                  I had to hack an ex’s account once to get the revenge porn they posted of me taken down.

                  There’s a balance at the end of the day.

                  L This user is from outside of this forum
                  L This user is from outside of this forum
                  [email protected]
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #83

                  Illegal content has always been unprotected & subject to removal by the law.
                  Moderation policies wouldn't necessarily remove porn presumed to be legal, either, so moderation is still a crapshoot.

                  Still, that sucks.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • J [email protected]

                    Bluesky had better take care that they not act like other cowardly tech media

                    F This user is from outside of this forum
                    F This user is from outside of this forum
                    [email protected]
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #84

                    If they don't it is only because they are waiting to obtain a higher share of the social media market.

                    Jumping ship from one corporate owned social media to another corporate owned social media isn't a smart move. There is nothing about Bluesky that will prevent it from becoming X in the future. People joining now are only adding to the network effect that will make leaving more difficult in a decade or two.

                    The problem of social media won't be solved by choosing which dictator's rule you want to live under. You don't have the freedom to speak and express yourself if you give someone veto power over your speech.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • M [email protected]

                      I guess I get it. They would not like to set precedent to allow non-consensual AI generated porn on the platform. Seems reasonable. That said, fuck Donny. The video is hilarious. It’s fine if Bluesky doesn’t host it though.

                      G This user is from outside of this forum
                      G This user is from outside of this forum
                      [email protected]
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #85

                      Holy shit. A reasonable take from someone who clearly leaves the house.

                      O 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • excrubulent@slrpnk.netE [email protected]

                        By "technically better" I mean it actually delivers on its technical promises of decentralisation, as opposed to bluesky that simply uses decentralisation as a buzzword without being actually open source and without allowing real competition for the main - centralised - instance.

                        I think mastodon has actual legs in that if bluesky fails to actually open up, it will enshittify and there will be another exodus. Mastodon has technical barriers to that kind problem, so it will still be there to pick up the pieces. The decentralised nature protects the network from enshittifying and means it will tend not to ger exoduses like central platforms do.

                        If in that time mastodon has worked on its discovery features, it might be finally ready to capture that growth.

                        If bluesky manages to properly decentralise then I imagine mastodon will not need to pick up the slack and will either join the network or fade into irrelevancy.

                        Hard to say which way it will go. I don't hold out a lot of hope for bluesky changing its ways, and who knows when mastodon will improve in this way.

                        a_wild_mimic_appears@lemmy.dbzer0.comA This user is from outside of this forum
                        a_wild_mimic_appears@lemmy.dbzer0.comA This user is from outside of this forum
                        [email protected]
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #86

                        Bluesky will never be able to properly decentralize, since the costs are prohibitive and cannot be afforded by normal users. The shared heap concept used is currently somewhere around 10-15 TB storage, which is already pretty expensive to host for a single person, and that's only the STORAGE for a single host NOW - no redundancy, no backups, no traffic and no worldwide infrastructure to keep the response time down. That's a huge difference to a Mastodon instance, which can be run from a pretty cheap setup and is afforable for most people.

                        Also, the way Bluesky implements how user identities are handled makes account migration more a theoretical possibility than a believable "decentralization". Theoretically Bluesky gives a credible exit strategy, where the shared heap can be copied by another organisation in case of loss of user trust or bankruptcy of the company and everyone can just switch over and carry on without losing a single post, but there are a lot of big if's in that theory.

                        Here's the source, from Christine Lemmer-Webber who worked on ActivityPub: https://dustycloud.org/blog/how-decentralized-is-bluesky/

                        excrubulent@slrpnk.netE 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • a_wild_mimic_appears@lemmy.dbzer0.comA [email protected]

                          Bluesky will never be able to properly decentralize, since the costs are prohibitive and cannot be afforded by normal users. The shared heap concept used is currently somewhere around 10-15 TB storage, which is already pretty expensive to host for a single person, and that's only the STORAGE for a single host NOW - no redundancy, no backups, no traffic and no worldwide infrastructure to keep the response time down. That's a huge difference to a Mastodon instance, which can be run from a pretty cheap setup and is afforable for most people.

                          Also, the way Bluesky implements how user identities are handled makes account migration more a theoretical possibility than a believable "decentralization". Theoretically Bluesky gives a credible exit strategy, where the shared heap can be copied by another organisation in case of loss of user trust or bankruptcy of the company and everyone can just switch over and carry on without losing a single post, but there are a lot of big if's in that theory.

                          Here's the source, from Christine Lemmer-Webber who worked on ActivityPub: https://dustycloud.org/blog/how-decentralized-is-bluesky/

                          excrubulent@slrpnk.netE This user is from outside of this forum
                          excrubulent@slrpnk.netE This user is from outside of this forum
                          [email protected]
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #87

                          Oh, I didn't realise the technical barriers were that steep. In that case I think I'm right to say that Mastodon is technically better for achieving the decentralisation it promises.

                          That's a great resource, I'm going to follow them. Plus the link to Spritely was really interesting. Looks like it's meant to be a successor to ActivityPub, which is quite exciting. From what I've seen activity pub is pretty limited in the ways it can enable interaction, like how mastodon posts look so funky on lemmy.

                          Plus, holy web 1.0, that's a motherfucking website.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • cosmiccleric@lemmy.worldC [email protected]

                            Either involuntary AI generated pornography is wrong or it isn’t.

                            Agree. Laws have to be applied evenly, or else they are not Laws.

                            ~This~ ~comment~ ~is~ ~licensed~ ~under~ ~CC~ ~BY-NC-SA~ ~4.0~

                            zecg@lemmy.worldZ This user is from outside of this forum
                            zecg@lemmy.worldZ This user is from outside of this forum
                            [email protected]
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #88

                            Good thing you put a permissive license on that so the whole of humanity can benefit.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • F [email protected]

                              Their moderation has been garbage lately. They're wrongly banning people for things they didn't do. It's just premusk twitter at this point. The real fediverse is a better vet medium and long term

                              A This user is from outside of this forum
                              A This user is from outside of this forum
                              [email protected]
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #89

                              It's just premusk twitter at this point.

                              I mean, given that Jack Dorsey founded it as basically the "not Twitter Twitter" after musk bought the main one, I don't think it's surprising to see it face basically the same moderation issues in the name of being "even-handed"

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • L [email protected]

                                Ah, the rewards of moderation: the best move is not to play.
                                Fuck it is & has always been a better answer.
                                Anarchy of the early internet was better than letting some paternalistic authority decide the right images & words to allow us to see, and decentralization isn't a bad idea.

                                Yet the forward-thinking people of today know better and insist that with their brave, new moderation they'll paternalize better without stopping to acknowledge how horribly broken, arbitrary, & fallible that entire approach is.
                                Instead of learning what we already knew, social media keeps repeating the same dumb mistakes.

                                N This user is from outside of this forum
                                N This user is from outside of this forum
                                [email protected]
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #90

                                You need some kind of moderation for user generated content, even if it’s only to comply with takedowns related to law (and I’m not talking about DCMA).

                                L 1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • S [email protected]

                                  I'd expect a little more enthusiasm from our Commander in Chief...

                                  W This user is from outside of this forum
                                  W This user is from outside of this forum
                                  [email protected]
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #91

                                  He's old and tired.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • L [email protected]

                                    Ah, the rewards of moderation: the best move is not to play.
                                    Fuck it is & has always been a better answer.
                                    Anarchy of the early internet was better than letting some paternalistic authority decide the right images & words to allow us to see, and decentralization isn't a bad idea.

                                    Yet the forward-thinking people of today know better and insist that with their brave, new moderation they'll paternalize better without stopping to acknowledge how horribly broken, arbitrary, & fallible that entire approach is.
                                    Instead of learning what we already knew, social media keeps repeating the same dumb mistakes.

                                    C This user is from outside of this forum
                                    C This user is from outside of this forum
                                    [email protected]
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #92

                                    Fuck it is & has always been a better answer

                                    Sure. Unless you live in a place that have laws and laws enforcement. In that case, it's "fuck it and get burnt down".

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • robottoaster@mander.xyzR [email protected]

                                      You can just move to another server and repost it.

                                      With blue sky there is no "another server"

                                      S This user is from outside of this forum
                                      S This user is from outside of this forum
                                      [email protected]
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #93

                                      Mod actions propagate though, no? So you'd have to post to a separate community, not just another server. I guess your admin could override a mod, but that's quite rare.

                                      robottoaster@mander.xyzR 1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • L [email protected]

                                        Ah, the rewards of moderation: the best move is not to play.
                                        Fuck it is & has always been a better answer.
                                        Anarchy of the early internet was better than letting some paternalistic authority decide the right images & words to allow us to see, and decentralization isn't a bad idea.

                                        Yet the forward-thinking people of today know better and insist that with their brave, new moderation they'll paternalize better without stopping to acknowledge how horribly broken, arbitrary, & fallible that entire approach is.
                                        Instead of learning what we already knew, social media keeps repeating the same dumb mistakes.

                                        R This user is from outside of this forum
                                        R This user is from outside of this forum
                                        [email protected]
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #94

                                        You do remember snuff and goatse and csam of the early internet, I hope.

                                        Even with that of course it was better, because that stuff still floats around, and small groups of enjoyers easily find ways to share it over mainstream platforms.

                                        I'm not even talking about big groups of enjoyers, ISIS (rebranded sometimes), Turkey, Azerbaijan, Israel, Myanma's regime, cartels and everyone share what they want of snuff genre, and it holds long enough.

                                        In text communication their points of view are also less likely to be banned or suppressed than mine.

                                        So yes.

                                        Yet the forward-thinking people of today know better and insist that with their brave, new moderation they’ll paternalize better

                                        They don't think so, just use the opportunity to do this stuff in area where immunity against it is not yet established.

                                        There are very few stupid people in positions of power, competition is a bitch.

                                        C 1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • excrubulent@slrpnk.netE [email protected]

                                          Right, my point is that they have the ingredients to meaningfully decentralise control, but until they do they are not meaningfully bettee than twitter, and it's just a branding exercise.

                                          Maybe they'll fix that, maybe they won't but until they do I think the fediverse's resilience proves that platforms will keep turning over until a viable federated system arises, whether that's bluesky, mastodon or something else.

                                          I can't even see where you disagree with this. You're just throwing out details withoit reference to how this affects my point.

                                          S This user is from outside of this forum
                                          S This user is from outside of this forum
                                          [email protected]
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #95

                                          until a viable federated system arises

                                          I fundamentally disagree that a federated system is the desired end goal.

                                          One of the problems it seems to try to solve is eliminating the risk of a service going down. Just like a centralized service, a federated service lasts only as long as the maintainers want it to last, and I think the risk of important services disappearing is higher when you remove the profit motive to keep it going. Hobbyists' pockets are only so deep, and they'll eventually die or lose interest. Yeah, I guess another service will pop up, which perpetuates some portion of the platform, but it doesn't really preserve the data.

                                          So I see things like Mastodon (and Lemmy) as more complicated alternatives to services like Twitter or BlueSky, but with many of the same downsides. Will the data still be there in 20 years? 50? 100? Idk, probably not. Maybe if you put together a non-profit or something, but even then, I have my doubts.

                                          So in that sense, I don't really see a technical advantage that the Fediverse has that BlueSky doesn't. If anything, I'd expect BlueSky to potentially stick around longer, assuming they can find a decent profit model, because money coming in tends to keep the servers running. Maybe they go bad like Reddit, maybe they get bought like Twitter, or maybe they stick it out longer (or maybe they open up to hobbyists). Whatever the case, I highly doubt Mastodon and friends will actually take over when they do disappear. It'll likely remain a hobbyist project until the next hot thing comes out (Fedi v2?), and never really reach mainstream success.

                                          Maybe I'm wrong. But given how the Reddit and Twitter exoduses have worked out, I don't think so.

                                          I want to see more projects looking into P2P, so that's where my interest lies. That way data and platforms can truly live forever, provided new people constantly come around to provide more storage. Communities and posts wouldn't live anywhere in particular (no single point of failure), but instead get distributed so there's a very low chance that any given bit of data will be truly lost, kind of like how torrents tend to keep on keeping on as long as someone is seeding (but people would only need to seed a small subset of the total data). I think that's a much more interesting idea than the Fediverse.

                                          excrubulent@slrpnk.netE 1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups