Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

agnos.is Forums

  1. Home
  2. Europe
  3. What would happen if Trump decided to take it by force?

What would happen if Trump decided to take it by force?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Europe
8 Posts 6 Posters 24 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • D This user is from outside of this forum
    D This user is from outside of this forum
    [email protected]
    wrote on last edited by
    #1

    What would happen if Trump decided to take it by force?

    ? S donantoniomagino@feddit.nlD 3 Replies Last reply
    0
    • System shared this topic on
    • D [email protected]

      What would happen if Trump decided to take it by force?

      ? Offline
      ? Offline
      Guest
      wrote on last edited by
      #2

      I believe that Germany and France issued a statement a while ago "warning" the US that borders must not be moved by force. Take from that what you will, but its hard to say.

      The reality is that whilst the US would struggle immensely to launch a ground invasion into mainland Europe, the US navy is too dominant at sea for Europe to have much of a chance defending Greenland.

      If they really did attempt to take it by force it would be the end of transatlantic-ism and Europe would find it self in increasing danger from its west and eastern neighbors. The only real deterrent to further encroachment at that point would be a European Army capable of seeing of threats from both Russia and the US, and likely Europe would seek new global partners.

      (Mandatory: this is just my speculative opinion as an International Relations Student, not an expert.)

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • D [email protected]

        What would happen if Trump decided to take it by force?

        S This user is from outside of this forum
        S This user is from outside of this forum
        [email protected]
        wrote on last edited by
        #3

        The vast ice sheet that covers Greenland would be the new home away from home to various Scandinavian special forces units who would habitually commit assassinations and sabotage against any occupying force. The result would be a massively asymmetric situation similar to Vietnam but in extremely cold temperatures.

        F 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • S [email protected]

          The vast ice sheet that covers Greenland would be the new home away from home to various Scandinavian special forces units who would habitually commit assassinations and sabotage against any occupying force. The result would be a massively asymmetric situation similar to Vietnam but in extremely cold temperatures.

          F This user is from outside of this forum
          F This user is from outside of this forum
          [email protected]
          wrote on last edited by
          #4

          Is there a reason why you suggest "various Scandinavian special forces" and a guerilla war? I find this perhaps a little far-fetched.

          F S 2 Replies Last reply
          0
          • D [email protected]

            What would happen if Trump decided to take it by force?

            donantoniomagino@feddit.nlD This user is from outside of this forum
            donantoniomagino@feddit.nlD This user is from outside of this forum
            [email protected]
            wrote on last edited by
            #5

            I read in some paper a while ago that the American parliament can stop an attack, but if an attack on Greenland can be done quickly enough (within 48 hours was the timespan I read mentioned) Trump could face them with a fait accompi.

            This is assuming the US would be capable of having it be a complete surprise attack. In reality (in my opinion) this may not be possible, in which case the Europeans would have time to respond, and the American parliament as well. I have no idea whether they’d be able to stop an attack in advance (though Republican support would obviously be needed for that as well).

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • F [email protected]

              Is there a reason why you suggest "various Scandinavian special forces" and a guerilla war? I find this perhaps a little far-fetched.

              F This user is from outside of this forum
              F This user is from outside of this forum
              [email protected]
              wrote on last edited by
              #6

              Yea, Vietnam had three Viet Kong hiding amongst the population and in caves in a dense jungle. Not 'hiding on an ice sheet'.

              S 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • F [email protected]

                Is there a reason why you suggest "various Scandinavian special forces" and a guerilla war? I find this perhaps a little far-fetched.

                S This user is from outside of this forum
                S This user is from outside of this forum
                [email protected]
                wrote on last edited by
                #7

                Greenland is part of the kingdom of Denmark. Norway, Denmark, Sweden and Finland have a long standing mutual defence pact separate from NATO. A direct confrontation with the United States navy would be foolish, so guerilla warfare would be a lot more beneficial. Unless Britain and France get involved of course. That would alter things somewhat.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • F [email protected]

                  Yea, Vietnam had three Viet Kong hiding amongst the population and in caves in a dense jungle. Not 'hiding on an ice sheet'.

                  S This user is from outside of this forum
                  S This user is from outside of this forum
                  [email protected]
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #8

                  I mean a long protracted conflict which the us will eventually back out of without having anything to show for it except a massive bill for destroyed equipment and a giant pr problem.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • System shared this topic on
                  Reply
                  • Reply as topic
                  Log in to reply
                  • Oldest to Newest
                  • Newest to Oldest
                  • Most Votes


                  • Login

                  • Login or register to search.
                  • First post
                    Last post
                  0
                  • Categories
                  • Recent
                  • Tags
                  • Popular
                  • World
                  • Users
                  • Groups