More than 50,000 killed in Gaza, Hamas-run health ministry says
-
In November, the UN Human Rights Office said its analysis showed close to 70% of verified victims over a six-month period were women and children
. -
System shared this topic on
-
Yeah, no way the number is that low.
-
Yeah, no way the number is that low.
It’s only the death that can be named and found, there must be thousands of dead people still stuck in all the rubble. A letter published by The Lancet even established that the death count could go as high as 186 000.
We will never now the true extent until it’s far too late.
-
It’s only the death that can be named and found, there must be thousands of dead people still stuck in all the rubble. A letter published by The Lancet even established that the death count could go as high as 186 000.
We will never now the true extent until it’s far too late.
Yeah, of course. The number was basically static for months after all hospitals were rendered inoperable, as that's where the counting was done. Probably part of the reason they were targeted.
-
In November, the UN Human Rights Office said its analysis showed close to 70% of verified victims over a six-month period were women and children
.Hamas run ministry
-
Hamas run ministry
Literally the first paragraph:
The UN's Human Rights Office has condemned the high number of civilians killed in the war in Gaza, saying its analysis shows close to 70% of verified victims over a six-month period were women and children.
Also see the only other comment when you posted this: https://lemmy.world/comment/15951331
-
Literally the first paragraph:
The UN's Human Rights Office has condemned the high number of civilians killed in the war in Gaza, saying its analysis shows close to 70% of verified victims over a six-month period were women and children.
Also see the only other comment when you posted this: https://lemmy.world/comment/15951331
I guess the BBC insisting on stating "Hamas-run" in its titles related to this conflict is not about partiality or transparency but rather create a false equivalence with the armed forces. It’s an oversimplification aimed at creating a certain narrative, and based on multiple sources it’s a policy of theirs not to display "bias" against israel.
-
In November, the UN Human Rights Office said its analysis showed close to 70% of verified victims over a six-month period were women and children
.Come the fuck on are we back to the "Hamas-run" nonsense again? Eat shit BBC.
-
Literally the first paragraph:
The UN's Human Rights Office has condemned the high number of civilians killed in the war in Gaza, saying its analysis shows close to 70% of verified victims over a six-month period were women and children.
Also see the only other comment when you posted this: https://lemmy.world/comment/15951331
And the title of the article?
-
What an i missing? They also call it Hamas-run ministry in this article
-
In November, the UN Human Rights Office said its analysis showed close to 70% of verified victims over a six-month period were women and children
.The deaths are much much higher. The IDF targets healthcare employees same as journalists. Can't count if you're dead I guess. World's most moral army, they said.
-
In November, the UN Human Rights Office said its analysis showed close to 70% of verified victims over a six-month period were women and children
.You should preface your title with "Israel-run BBC"
More than 100 BBC staff accuse broadcaster of Israel bias in Gaza coverage
-
In November, the UN Human Rights Office said its analysis showed close to 70% of verified victims over a six-month period were women and children
.The British medical Journal "The Lancet" estimated 100,000-250,000 dead and that was last year.
This is a genocide and corporate Western media is complicit.
The BBC is run by Zionists like Robbie Gibb and Raffi Berg. They are deliberately downplaying the deaths.
-
And the title of the article?
Your comment did not make clear what you found funny, but having come across so many similar comments before I assumed it was that the data was not reliable due to it being the "Hamas-run health ministry".
If you found the continued use of that term by the BBC funny, then my previous comment is irrelevant.
-
I guess the BBC insisting on stating "Hamas-run" in its titles related to this conflict is not about partiality or transparency but rather create a false equivalence with the armed forces. It’s an oversimplification aimed at creating a certain narrative, and based on multiple sources it’s a policy of theirs not to display "bias" against israel.
I didn't get the impression that the other commenter was laughing about BBC's use of the term.
I assumed they were doubting the health ministry's reliability/accuracy, but maybe I've just become jaded after dealing with so many Zionazis online.
-
Come the fuck on are we back to the "Hamas-run" nonsense again? Eat shit BBC.
“Hcccccchhhhhhamas-run”
-
I didn't get the impression that the other commenter was laughing about BBC's use of the term.
I assumed they were doubting the health ministry's reliability/accuracy, but maybe I've just become jaded after dealing with so many Zionazis online.
-
Fair point, It could be. Just know that, in any case, my comment was not directed towards yours.
I only used this opportunity to further explain my perspective regarding BBC coverage, that I wasn’t endorsing any kind of whitewashing.
Oh I understood that, but thanks for making it explicit. Very few larger media outlets have covered Palestine fairly unfortunately.
-
Your comment did not make clear what you found funny, but having come across so many similar comments before I assumed it was that the data was not reliable due to it being the "Hamas-run health ministry".
If you found the continued use of that term by the BBC funny, then my previous comment is irrelevant.
Yes, i thought that's what happened. No worries
-
Yes, i thought that's what happened. No worries
Thanks for clearing that up haha. It's hard not to be a pessimist on the internet.
