Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

agnos.is Forums

  1. Home
  2. World News
  3. Ukraine won't sign minerals deal with US if it threatens EU membership, Zelensky says

Ukraine won't sign minerals deal with US if it threatens EU membership, Zelensky says

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved World News
world
27 Posts 22 Posters 166 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • microwave@lemmy.worldM [email protected]

    Summary

    President Volodymyr Zelensky warned on March 28 that Ukraine will reject a proposed U.S. minerals deal if it endangers the country’s EU accession.

    A new draft, reportedly granting the U.S. extensive control over Ukrainian natural resources, raised concerns over economic sovereignty.

    Zelensky said lawyers will review the agreement, emphasizing it must not conflict with Ukraine’s constitutional EU alignment.

    The initial deal would create a joint fund reinvesting extraction proceeds into Ukraine. The White House views it as a way to recoup aid, but Kyiv remains cautious after a prior dispute with Trump.

    mooncake@lemm.eeM This user is from outside of this forum
    mooncake@lemm.eeM This user is from outside of this forum
    [email protected]
    wrote on last edited by
    #16

    Why the fuck would you even consider signing anything to that fat orange shit? Every single one of his administration just made a mockery of you last month

    underpantsweevil@lemmy.worldU 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • A [email protected]

      Ok, but what if we leave the minerals in the ground and preserve the world's most fertile and productive agricultural land instead of poisoning it with mining runoff?

      https://hir.harvard.edu/not-so-green-technology-the-complicated-legacy-of-rare-earth-mining/

      https://earth.org/rare-earth-mining-has-devastated-chinas-environment/

      https://climatecosmos.com/climate-science/the-impact-of-rare-earth-mining-on-the-environment/

      https://link.springer.com/article/10.1557/s43577-022-00286-6

      Chernobyl was bad enough... It's like they want humanity to starve.

      K This user is from outside of this forum
      K This user is from outside of this forum
      [email protected]
      wrote on last edited by
      #17

      Around here they build shopping malls over the most fertile land we have access to instead of using it to grow food for the millions of people living right next to it...

      D 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • microwave@lemmy.worldM [email protected]

        Summary

        President Volodymyr Zelensky warned on March 28 that Ukraine will reject a proposed U.S. minerals deal if it endangers the country’s EU accession.

        A new draft, reportedly granting the U.S. extensive control over Ukrainian natural resources, raised concerns over economic sovereignty.

        Zelensky said lawyers will review the agreement, emphasizing it must not conflict with Ukraine’s constitutional EU alignment.

        The initial deal would create a joint fund reinvesting extraction proceeds into Ukraine. The White House views it as a way to recoup aid, but Kyiv remains cautious after a prior dispute with Trump.

        rhoeri@lemmy.worldR This user is from outside of this forum
        rhoeri@lemmy.worldR This user is from outside of this forum
        [email protected]
        wrote on last edited by
        #18

        He shouldn’t sign it at all because it’s fucking stupid.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • microwave@lemmy.worldM [email protected]

          Summary

          President Volodymyr Zelensky warned on March 28 that Ukraine will reject a proposed U.S. minerals deal if it endangers the country’s EU accession.

          A new draft, reportedly granting the U.S. extensive control over Ukrainian natural resources, raised concerns over economic sovereignty.

          Zelensky said lawyers will review the agreement, emphasizing it must not conflict with Ukraine’s constitutional EU alignment.

          The initial deal would create a joint fund reinvesting extraction proceeds into Ukraine. The White House views it as a way to recoup aid, but Kyiv remains cautious after a prior dispute with Trump.

          S This user is from outside of this forum
          S This user is from outside of this forum
          [email protected]
          wrote on last edited by
          #19

          A deal with the USA means nothing, but that is as true today as it was in 2014 and 2022.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • F [email protected]

            Doesn't really matter. Ukraine does not have significant rare earth deposits in the first place. The whole thing is a farce.

            C This user is from outside of this forum
            C This user is from outside of this forum
            [email protected]
            wrote on last edited by
            #20

            Iirc the dirty secret of rare earth metals is that every country has them in at least some capacity even if there's variability in how easy to access those deposits are. The dirty part is that the countries that produce them less so have a particular abundance and more so have a lack of environmental regulations.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • mooncake@lemm.eeM [email protected]

              Why the fuck would you even consider signing anything to that fat orange shit? Every single one of his administration just made a mockery of you last month

              underpantsweevil@lemmy.worldU This user is from outside of this forum
              underpantsweevil@lemmy.worldU This user is from outside of this forum
              [email protected]
              wrote on last edited by
              #21

              Why the fuck would you even consider signing anything to that fat orange shit?

              Ask Chuck Schumer. He insists he's got his reasons.

              M 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • A [email protected]

                Ok, but what if we leave the minerals in the ground and preserve the world's most fertile and productive agricultural land instead of poisoning it with mining runoff?

                https://hir.harvard.edu/not-so-green-technology-the-complicated-legacy-of-rare-earth-mining/

                https://earth.org/rare-earth-mining-has-devastated-chinas-environment/

                https://climatecosmos.com/climate-science/the-impact-of-rare-earth-mining-on-the-environment/

                https://link.springer.com/article/10.1557/s43577-022-00286-6

                Chernobyl was bad enough... It's like they want humanity to starve.

                underpantsweevil@lemmy.worldU This user is from outside of this forum
                underpantsweevil@lemmy.worldU This user is from outside of this forum
                [email protected]
                wrote on last edited by
                #22

                It’s like they want humanity to starve.

                Quite a few members of the Trump Administration, including his Secretary of Health and Human Services, are avowed eugenicists.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • F [email protected]

                  Nope, we don't. This talking point is about a decade out of date. The solutions are all sitting right there without building any new nuclear.

                  https://www.amazon.com/No-Miracles-Needed-Technology-Climate/dp/1009249541

                  underpantsweevil@lemmy.worldU This user is from outside of this forum
                  underpantsweevil@lemmy.worldU This user is from outside of this forum
                  [email protected]
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #23

                  The argument behind this book revolves around cheap, durable, and at-cost managed utilities with the capacity to shepherd renewable energy in a manner that replicates the need for base load.

                  The problem with this as a solution comes down to an unforgiving contradiction - this solution does not create high rates of profit. Without high-profit public works, you don't get buy-in from the financial sector. And without financial sector buy-in, you don't get business administrators willing to engage the private sector in construction, development, and maintenance of these systems.

                  The book doesn't mint enough new billionaires, so it won't be accepted as a solution in a western free market system.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • K [email protected]

                    Around here they build shopping malls over the most fertile land we have access to instead of using it to grow food for the millions of people living right next to it...

                    D This user is from outside of this forum
                    D This user is from outside of this forum
                    [email protected]
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #24

                    Ontario. Open for businesses.

                    K 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • underpantsweevil@lemmy.worldU [email protected]

                      Why the fuck would you even consider signing anything to that fat orange shit?

                      Ask Chuck Schumer. He insists he's got his reasons.

                      M This user is from outside of this forum
                      M This user is from outside of this forum
                      [email protected]
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #25

                      Because, unlike Trump, he wants his constituents to stop dying.

                      E 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • D [email protected]

                        Ontario. Open for businesses.

                        K This user is from outside of this forum
                        K This user is from outside of this forum
                        [email protected]
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #26

                        Quebec, south shore of the St Lawrence, across the bridge from Montreal!

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • M [email protected]

                          Because, unlike Trump, he wants his constituents to stop dying.

                          E This user is from outside of this forum
                          E This user is from outside of this forum
                          [email protected]
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #27

                          And unlike Trump, isn't a waste of oxygen on this planet.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • System shared this topic on
                          Reply
                          • Reply as topic
                          Log in to reply
                          • Oldest to Newest
                          • Newest to Oldest
                          • Most Votes


                          • Login

                          • Login or register to search.
                          • First post
                            Last post
                          0
                          • Categories
                          • Recent
                          • Tags
                          • Popular
                          • World
                          • Users
                          • Groups