Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

agnos.is Forums

  1. Home
  2. Technology
  3. YouTube removes 'gender identity' from hate speech policy

YouTube removes 'gender identity' from hate speech policy

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Technology
technology
370 Posts 189 Posters 2 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • L [email protected]

    You're right. They didn't.

    I This user is from outside of this forum
    I This user is from outside of this forum
    [email protected]
    wrote on last edited by
    #352

    The delulu is strong with this one.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • I [email protected]
      This post did not contain any content.
      ? Offline
      ? Offline
      Guest
      wrote on last edited by
      #353

      I'm a little bit confused on this: if you visit the policy page now it does (at least for me, in Europe) still list "Sex, Gender, or Sexual Orientation" as a protected group in that exact same list. Obviously slightly different as they've combined a couple of different groups in there where previously they were delineated: plus I wonder if this is potentially showing because I'm in a different region. Would be interested to see what someone in NA sees: https://support.google.com/youtube/answer/2801939

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • ? Guest

        Switch to AdNauseam.

        It clicks ads in addition to blocking them.

        C This user is from outside of this forum
        C This user is from outside of this forum
        [email protected]
        wrote on last edited by
        #354

        What does this achieve other than funneling money from companies' advertising budget to Google a little faster?

        ? 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • C [email protected]

          What does this achieve other than funneling money from companies' advertising budget to Google a little faster?

          ? Offline
          ? Offline
          Guest
          wrote on last edited by
          #355

          It undermines the integrity of the digital advertising ecosystem while providing additional income for website operators.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • snotflickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zoneS [email protected]

            And I'm saying you're not paying for it, and that's the problem. Everyone got way too comfortable with getting "free" shit from corporations that would trample our rights the second it became convenient for them.

            W This user is from outside of this forum
            W This user is from outside of this forum
            [email protected]
            wrote on last edited by
            #356

            Just here to say it’s fucking WILD that you’re being downvoted

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • A [email protected]

              Boycotts are performative stunts that feel good but don't have impact on companies and even gets more attention ON those companies.

              No really, this is a phenomenon that's known. When people were protesting Blizzard, I swear to fucking god, people I knew for years who hadn't played WoW since they were kids suddenly decided to reactivate their accounts because all the talk about blizzard "made them nostalgic" and despite being sympathetic to the people hurt by the company, they simply didn't have the mental value-system to draw lines between those two things. Their own desires to escape and recapture youth was far, far stronger than the social messaging they honestly just felt was finger-wagging and parental scolding, so they rejected the idea of protesting without conscious thought.

              If we put that much energy into volunteering with groups raising funds for primaries, getting to know our neighbors and forming communities, we would abolish this fascist empire in a single election cycle. (Assuming we have elections again.)

              A This user is from outside of this forum
              A This user is from outside of this forum
              [email protected]
              wrote on last edited by
              #357

              Boycotts are not enough, but in combination with girlcotts they are very efficient.

              I'll see myself out.

              I A 2 Replies Last reply
              0
              • ? Guest

                (For reference: I am cishet, but have family & friends in the LGBTQ+ community and consider myself an ally.) Usually just lurk, but I feel you so badly.

                I've been saying it forever as well. They're spending millions, to specifically target/advertise/appeal to the community... out of the goodness of their hearts? Right.

                Then as soon as its "over", the facade drops and its on to the next big event/target market. Rinse and repeat.

                ? Offline
                ? Offline
                Guest
                wrote on last edited by
                #358

                As a cishet I saw it what was as soon as they started it. It was about 10-15 years ago. It was sleazy then, and it's sleazy now. They are just trying to milk the population as much as they can. They don't give two fucks about inclusiveness or equality. They know a large portion of Americans want equality. So it's a cash cow.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • L [email protected]

                  Fuckin’ Melvin

                  I This user is from outside of this forum
                  I This user is from outside of this forum
                  [email protected]
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #359

                  MELVIN USED MORAL SUPERIORITY

                  BUT IT FAILED

                  IT HURT ITSELF IN ITS CONFUSION

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • A [email protected]

                    Boycotts are not enough, but in combination with girlcotts they are very efficient.

                    I'll see myself out.

                    I This user is from outside of this forum
                    I This user is from outside of this forum
                    [email protected]
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #360

                    They say when a boycott meets a girlcott, a baby cot is born...

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • A [email protected]

                      Boycotts are not enough, but in combination with girlcotts they are very efficient.

                      I'll see myself out.

                      A This user is from outside of this forum
                      A This user is from outside of this forum
                      [email protected]
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #361

                      Best reply I got here tbh.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • southsamurai@sh.itjust.worksS [email protected]

                        So, sundar pinchai can be added to the list of CEOs that suck?

                        Because a lot of the time, it's weird that when the company does nasty shit, nobody names him as the head asshole in charge the way that other companies and ceos get handled.

                        The dude has been in the driver's seat for pretty much every major deterioration of Google/alphabet for years.

                        V This user is from outside of this forum
                        V This user is from outside of this forum
                        [email protected]
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #362

                        Prabhakar Raghavanalso also deserves a dishonorable mention.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • C [email protected]

                          Of course everyone is allowed to speak their mind. But being called names for not supporting a particular point of view sounds like hate speech to me, wouldn't you agree?

                          S This user is from outside of this forum
                          S This user is from outside of this forum
                          [email protected]
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #363

                          No, hate speech is targeting someone for how they were born. (Skin color, sexual orientatio, gender identity, ect.) Reacting to someone saying stupid shit is not hate speech and dilutes the meaning of the word to use it that way.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • ? Guest

                            I used newpipe for a long time, currently using a fork called pipepipe. I forgot why I switched lol

                            https://pipepipe.dev/

                            S This user is from outside of this forum
                            S This user is from outside of this forum
                            [email protected]
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #364

                            Ooh, great to know. Thanks!

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • H [email protected]

                              It's almost impressive how quickly the whole of the business world capitulated to Donald Trump.

                              F This user is from outside of this forum
                              F This user is from outside of this forum
                              [email protected]
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #365

                              They didn't capitulate. They were mostly faking it all along, friend. It made for good profit at the time and to get good Blackrock or Vanguard investment money.
                              This is why despite putting rainbows in X, or FB, or YT, or LinkedIn profiles in the USA or in some Western countries, no company ever did that in any profile outside the West.
                              It was all for show... and money.
                              If they actually believe it they would have done so across the board. Yet they didn't. They were just hoping most people wouldn't notice. Many did. There was a meme RE: this floating around from years ago, too.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • D [email protected]

                                It’s almost like their support for these issues was never genuine to begin with.

                                F This user is from outside of this forum
                                F This user is from outside of this forum
                                [email protected]
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #366

                                Exactly. 😕

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • J [email protected]

                                  Consider the decentralized family of https://trom.tf/ apps, such as https://search.trom.tf/ as a replacement (that's the only one I use of their stuff so far... but may poke around more later).

                                  S This user is from outside of this forum
                                  S This user is from outside of this forum
                                  [email protected]
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #367

                                  What a treasure trove. I love lemmy

                                  J 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • S [email protected]

                                    What a treasure trove. I love lemmy

                                    J This user is from outside of this forum
                                    J This user is from outside of this forum
                                    [email protected]
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #368

                                    Ironically........ I myself found this through Reddit, no joke! But yeah, I hope to sway more people here.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • D [email protected]

                                      Don't Be Evil

                                      F This user is from outside of this forum
                                      F This user is from outside of this forum
                                      [email protected]
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #369

                                      Do the "right" thing.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • I [email protected]

                                        Probably for SponsorBlock.

                                        ? Offline
                                        ? Offline
                                        Guest
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #370

                                        You're correct! And its done such a good job that it's allowed me to forget (unintentionally) that issue even exists!

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • System shared this topic on
                                        Reply
                                        • Reply as topic
                                        Log in to reply
                                        • Oldest to Newest
                                        • Newest to Oldest
                                        • Most Votes


                                        • Login

                                        • Login or register to search.
                                        • First post
                                          Last post
                                        0
                                        • Categories
                                        • Recent
                                        • Tags
                                        • Popular
                                        • World
                                        • Users
                                        • Groups