“It Wouldn’t Be Surprising If, in Two Years’ Time, There Was a Film Made Completely Through AI”: Says Hayao Miyazaki’s Own Son
-
I did too, actually. I don’t know why it popped into my head immediately reading “AI movie”. Maybe the animation?
Now I kind of want to watch it again.
Probably the weird thing they were doing where they wanted to make a CG "actress" who could play roles in other CG films.
-
If he means A.I. Artificial Intelligence then its too late. Spielberg already made that film back in 2001.
I honestly really disliked that movie. Wonder if I'd feel differently now that I'm older.
-
This post did not contain any content.
There are still some films worth looking.
But will there be any then?
-
I honestly really disliked that movie. Wonder if I'd feel differently now that I'm older.
I liked it, but I'm a sucker for "robot wanna be a real boy" type stories
-
This post did not contain any content.
Something I'd personally love to be able to do is to ask it to recreate an existing tv series but according to my personal preferences by removing stuff from them that I don't like and adding things that I do. The Walking Dead for example wouldn't even need that much tweaking to make it actually good. Another thing I'd love to use it for is to create new seasons for finished series such as Yellowstone.
-
Goro Miyazaki directed Tales From Earthsea. When you look at how bad that movie is, it makes sense that he wouldn't see AI movies as inherently problematic; they'll be similar in quality to his own work.
I liked that one. I'm supremely doubtful he's correct, but I don't think his directorial prowess has anything to do with it.
-
Not "Completely", but they are trying.
The Last Screenwriter
https://www.imdb.com/title/tt32236000/
"Featured Review" is telling.
Cancel-culture mob missed the point.
Shame on the cinemas who cancelled the screening because whinging mobs shook their fists.First of all, the movie is non-profit. Secondly, it was made by a real human crew and real actors.
It was clever to get ChatGPT to write a film script about a screenwriter who feels his job is threatened by AI's superior writing ability. How can anyone not be curious to watch this movie?
...
Ultimately, the script lacks any real punch or decent plot twists or narrative layering that we humans love about film. It doesn't go anywhere you wouldn't predict.
emphasis mine.
Maybe we just don't like AI, and billionaire fuckwads just need to suck it up and move on, like how Zuck bet the farm that the Metaverse was going to be the next hot thing and now has to pretend he didn't spend gobs of money on it.
But no, it's the cancel-culture mob.
JFC, what a take. -
This post did not contain any content.
Yeah ok but his movie sucked ass so I don't really consider him an authority just becuase his dad is.
-
Goro Miyazaki directed Tales From Earthsea. When you look at how bad that movie is, it makes sense that he wouldn't see AI movies as inherently problematic; they'll be similar in quality to his own work.
Even worse, he directed Earwig and the Witch... Tales From Earthsea was at least somewhat competent
-
If he means A.I. Artificial Intelligence then its too late. Spielberg already made that film back in 2001.
I still don't believe that Kubrick actually wanted the movie to be as bad as it was...
-
Something I'd personally love to be able to do is to ask it to recreate an existing tv series but according to my personal preferences by removing stuff from them that I don't like and adding things that I do. The Walking Dead for example wouldn't even need that much tweaking to make it actually good. Another thing I'd love to use it for is to create new seasons for finished series such as Yellowstone.
And to make sure that everyone is portrayed by glen powell
-
Goro Miyazaki directed Tales From Earthsea. When you look at how bad that movie is, it makes sense that he wouldn't see AI movies as inherently problematic; they'll be similar in quality to his own work.
Passing reminder that Goro Miyazaki is an architect who never wanted to make movies. He was brought on as an architecture advisor, and the studio kept pushing him to take more and more responsibility because he's his father's son, and his father encouraged it. The movie sucks because he's not a director and he didn't want to make it.
-
I honestly really disliked that movie. Wonder if I'd feel differently now that I'm older.
It’s admittedly not a “fun” movie. It’s a really sad story in the end and most of the movie, the characters are uncomfortable in their situation.
I think it touches on some real questions we’re going to have to ask ourselves in the coming years about how much we’re going to allow AI into our personal lives.
For anyone who hasn’t seen it, it forgets most of it, it’s worth seeing. Just don’t expect iRobot or Black Mirror.
-
This post did not contain any content.
:cough: "Twins HinaHima" :cough: (Admittedly only about a third of a feature film in runtime, but that's close enough for me. However, I haven't been able to find any English-language information on just how much of the work the AI was responsible for.)
-
I liked it, but I'm a sucker for "robot wanna be a real boy" type stories
Can you suggest movie you like in this subgenre?
-
Can you suggest movie you like in this subgenre?
The Iron Giant, Wall-E, Her, Blade Runner, A.I. Artificial Intelligence, Metropolis (2001), Astro Boy. Probably forgetting some really good examples though
-
Goro Miyazaki directed Tales From Earthsea. When you look at how bad that movie is, it makes sense that he wouldn't see AI movies as inherently problematic; they'll be similar in quality to his own work.
Which is really a shame because the book series is fantastic.
-
The Iron Giant, Wall-E, Her, Blade Runner, A.I. Artificial Intelligence, Metropolis (2001), Astro Boy. Probably forgetting some really good examples though
Ghost In The Shell, (the original anime movie) kinda
-
This post did not contain any content.
Powered by his dad spinning in the grave presumably
-
This post did not contain any content.
I mean the concept seems pretty obvious. Obviously it won't be supprising when a film is made completely through AI... What will be suprising will be if it doesn't suck.
I find it weird that this is being viewed as a difference between the 2, when to me the quotes seem pretty much the same. IE the father
father: "I see you did this, it's terrible and I want nothing to do with it, it's an insult to life".
Son: "I don't think it's unlikely people will make a movie entirely through AI, whether anyone will want to see it is anyone's guess".
I don't see any quotes from the son on his opinion of quality, and if anything I see skepticism towards quality. I don't think anyone can deny, a lot of people are going to try really hard to make full movies entirely from AI. That's as obvious of a statement as "people will try to make cars that drive themselves".
