Android 16's new 90:10 split-screen is a game-changer for multitasking
-
This post did not contain any content.
-
This post did not contain any content.
Why not take out the 0s and say 9:1
-
Why not take out the 0s and say 9:1
Because people are dumb and would be asking why they only use 10% of the screen...
-
This post did not contain any content.
I always like to watch videos vertically.
-
This post did not contain any content.
Honestly kind of cool. I don't use split screen much but when I do it's usually for maps and music because having the ability to swipe to the next song is often more reliable that my steering wheel controls. Easier to use in rental cars in my experience too. Not sure I need it to be that extreme for my use case though.
-
This post did not contain any content.
You can just swipe back and forth, whats the issue they are trying to solve?
-
Why not take out the 0s and say 9:1
wrote on last edited by [email protected]Do you split the bill 50:50 or 5:5?
-
I always like to watch videos vertically.
Then you'll love being able to read a description of Android Authority at the same time.
-
You can just swipe back and forth, whats the issue they are trying to solve?
Sometimes you need to work in 2 apps simultaneously. Switching is not the same at all.
Android, unlike iOS, actually runs apps simultaneously.
Using a pass code for an app/website that won't allow copy/paste, for example. I don't use it a lot, but occasionally it can be useful to have maps and media player going together. Or 2 mapping apps.
-
This post did not contain any content.
Congratulations to Android for discovering the LG V20, whose 2nd screen did the same thing in 2016
-
Sometimes you need to work in 2 apps simultaneously. Switching is not the same at all.
Android, unlike iOS, actually runs apps simultaneously.
Using a pass code for an app/website that won't allow copy/paste, for example. I don't use it a lot, but occasionally it can be useful to have maps and media player going together. Or 2 mapping apps.
wrote on last edited by [email protected]True. Splitscreen is also the only option I know to watch videos and commenting on lemmy. At least for apps that don't support floating windows.
-
This post did not contain any content.
Isn't it adjustable already? Or is that only in the versions I use (Lineage forks).
It would be nice to be able to set a default other than 50:50
-
Congratulations to Android for discovering the LG V20, whose 2nd screen did the same thing in 2016
wrote on last edited by [email protected]I'm not sure they're really comparable.
That phones 2nd display was: 1040x160 pixels
The main display was: 2560x1440
~4%
The 2nd display also couldn't display another app, but was limited to:
- Quick Tools (Wi-Fi, Bluetooth)
- App shortcuts (specific apps)
- Recent apps
- Quick contacts
- Music controls
- Signature (By default your name)
- Upcoming plans
And didn't allow inline replies or 'normal' notification features (at that time it was Android 7).
The one perk that phone did have was that the 2nd display could be on while the main screen was off.
-
Isn't it adjustable already? Or is that only in the versions I use (Lineage forks).
It would be nice to be able to set a default other than 50:50
It is but I guess not as far as 90%?
-
This post did not contain any content.wrote on last edited by [email protected]
Cool, my galaxy s4 with some mods just let me resize to whatever ratio in 2014. And the stupid thing is... most apps support this right now. Google is just being stupid
-
Then you'll love being able to read a description of Android Authority at the same time.
Obviously, the screen could then be mostly text actually, say 30:70 instead of the proposed 90:10.
-
This post did not contain any content.
Close enough, welcome back Samsung Continuum.
-
This post did not contain any content.
Can't wait for my three screen fold out phone so I can have the desktop experience in the palm of my hand!
-
This post did not contain any content.
This is already a feature in colorOS based phones.
-
Do you split the bill 50:50 or 5:5?
Screen aspect ratios are typically represented at their lowest whole number, no? That's why we have 4:3 instead of 8:6 etc so I thought the same applied here
