I hope i don't get downvoted for this
-
You're not picking up what I'm laying down.
I'm not arguing that feet and breasts aren't capable of providing sexual stimulation from a first person perspective. I'm saying that from a third person perspective, theres nothing about them which inherently arousing; that arousal stems from novelty.
Just like mouth, ears and all kind of body parts are capable of providing sexual stimulation without being considered arousing in the sense we still view breasts/ass and such.
-
Nudists think people who wear clothes and dont question whether their shame is vindicated are weird. I'm inclined to agree with them lol.
Honestly visiting an onsen was somewhat of an eye opener. I felt pretty comfortable with my body when all these normal dudes were naked and nobody cared about each others bodys.
-
This post did not contain any content.
I love pantsI love feet
Feet pants
Pants feet
-
Deer God: what
-
“I am a man that’s made of meat,
While you’re on the internet, looking at feet”"I'm subscribed to your mom's OnlyFans
I spent five bucks a month to get pictures of her flappy giblets" -
I always feel silly to be such a vanilla romantic. I don't need much more than a snuggle and a little poop on my chest.
It's the simple pleasures.
-
...that's not what secondary sex characteristic means. As the article you linked says, that just means physical characteristics unrelated to the reproductive system that differ between the sexes. Some of the other examples given include the Adam's apple in men and longer arms relative to height in women. While some of these things can be sexually attractive or related to sexual attractiveness in some way, certainly we don't societally put them in the same sexual category as women's breasts.
Breasts are larger than they need to be, and they're that size all the time. One hypothesis is that they're used to signal sexual maturity and attract mates.
But aside from that, breasts and nipples are definitely a bigger erogenous zone than most parts of the body, probably second only to genitals. And they're directly involved in reproduction as you need them to feed babies.
And most importantly, most societies view them as sexual even if some don't. So what makes something sexual anyway? That's a subjective thing, it works by consensus.
-
I always feel silly to be such a vanilla romantic. I don't need much more than a snuggle and a little poop on my chest.
-
I kinda would rather be attracted to feet, if I'm honest.
it's certainly cheaper
-
This post did not contain any content.
Eemmmmm fungi
-
I love pants
I love feet
Feet pants
Pants feet
Look at this graph!
-
Well I just saved it to deploy anytime I see "deer god" from now on.
-
I always feel silly to be such a vanilla romantic. I don't need much more than a snuggle and a little poop on my chest.
Ah, a Cleveland Steamer afficionado
-
I typed "deer god" into google
And when he came by, just snapped a photo?
-
I became interested in why foot fetishes occur recently.
Basically, it's the same reason why breasts are considered sexual (they aren't); it's all about novelty. If we lived in a nudist colony, neither feet, nor breasts would be considered sexy.
Feet get covered by shoes, making them more novel.
Tribal cultures dont regarded breasts, or feet, as sexy.
Though it begs the question: if nudity became normalized, then what would be novel?
People would find personalities, voices, power dynamics, and fantasies more or less erotic than they are now (for most people).
Dressed people ofc!
-
This post did not contain any content.
But sonic has SO MUCH foot to be attracted to.
Ah well, at least you still have sonic inflation.
-
wrote on last edited by [email protected]
Sure, sure. Catch it, if that's what you're in to.
-
This post did not contain any content.
Yeah I'm grateful I'm just into normal things like pain
-
I always feel silly to be such a vanilla romantic. I don't need much more than a snuggle and a little poop on my chest.
-
I became interested in why foot fetishes occur recently.
Basically, it's the same reason why breasts are considered sexual (they aren't); it's all about novelty. If we lived in a nudist colony, neither feet, nor breasts would be considered sexy.
Feet get covered by shoes, making them more novel.
Tribal cultures dont regarded breasts, or feet, as sexy.
Though it begs the question: if nudity became normalized, then what would be novel?
People would find personalities, voices, power dynamics, and fantasies more or less erotic than they are now (for most people).
Though it begs the question: if nudity became normalized, then what would be novel?
Not an sexologist or even a sexy anthropologist, but my intuition is that aesthetic attraction would always be a factor (since it doesn't rely on sexual attraction), and that acting in a sexually provocative would be the way to provoke the horny gaze.
It might be nice to have less sexualization of people just be virtue of their existing in a sexualized body. That's the dream, anyway.
