I hope i don't get downvoted for this
-
Not everyone's nipples are sensitive FYI.
yeah that's how being an organic being works, some people will always differ from the norm, that doesn't really.. mean anything?
-
I mean sure, you do you. If everyone wore gloves in a parallel timeline, you'd probably want chin scratches.
nah, i have somewhat of a hand fetish and it has nothing to do with how hidden or not they are, i just think hands are inherently attractive if they look nice and feminine. Also big part of it is how sensitive the fingertips are, touching sensitive parts is just always gonna be nice.
-
honestly I'm just glad I don't have a shit fetish
So many possibilities just flushed down the toilet...
-
This post did not contain any content.wrote on last edited by [email protected]
(i am asexual)
-
wrote on last edited by [email protected]
aww this looked so much funnier when I thought the flap over the face was a beak, the face was a malformed turkey wattle, and the ear a mostly lidded eye. Looks like such a derpy bird that way, but nooo it has to be a human face!
-
Though it begs the question: if nudity became normalized, then what would be novel?
Not an sexologist or even a sexy anthropologist, but my intuition is that aesthetic attraction would always be a factor (since it doesn't rely on sexual attraction), and that acting in a sexually provocative would be the way to provoke the horny gaze.
It might be nice to have less sexualization of people just be virtue of their existing in a sexualized body. That's the dream, anyway.
I would phrase that near-last sentiment, "...in a sexy body." instead. No one should be oggled simply for being sexy, but if they are sexualizing themselves, (like dressing up for a night club) I'd argue that can indicate a desire to be oggled. They still should not be objectified, but when someone is trying to look sexy, I bet most people would be disappointed to get zero glances.
-
So is thick back hair
Hey, some people love body hair, so you're not disproving much.
-
yeah that's how being an organic being works, some people will always differ from the norm, that doesn't really.. mean anything?
wrote on last edited by [email protected]It means they exist (see trans rights). Though yes, it doesn't really speak to what a society must accept as sexualized that something simply exists in counter to the norm.
To think such silly things is equivalent to religious people trying to protect their kids from "catching the gay" or becoming a lesbian simply because they met one. Just because it exists doesn't mean it has to become a norm for everyone, and just because it exists doesn't suddenly redefine the norm. Such braindead thoughts show up in far too many places. (like the previous comment)
-
And some people are asexual, doesn't mean that most people aren't.
wrote on last edited by [email protected]It's not even that unusual. But I was talking about actual people, not most people.
Just pointing out for the young people in the audience -- some people will get nothing out of nipple play, but sadly put on a show anyway. Best to check.
-
This post did not contain any content.
It's awesome though
-
Deer god, why the fuck did you make foot people so vocal?
Yeah, being into feet isn't inherently bad. But foot fetishists are always so damn creepy about it.
-
(i am asexual)
It feels like a blessing almost always.
When it doesnt is when someone wants nothing more than to fuck you and you're like neat. Want to cuddle after I get you off? Because this dick ain't budging lmfao
-
Gives people the choice whether they want to be sexualized or no. Like you shouldn't have to wear a giant form-disguising hoodie just to keep from being ogled.
I suppose I could see that. I'm assuming you're a woman or female-presenting cause that's not something I can fully empathize with as a dude. But you do have the choice of dressing how you want to be perceived, no? I'm sure there are other options beyond wearing a trash bag of a top.
-
(i am asexual)
I don't mean to offend you, but do you still feel non-sexual attraction towards a particular or both genders?
-
yeah that's how being an organic being works, some people will always differ from the norm, that doesn't really.. mean anything?
It's not abnormal. It's just a type of person.
I get a lil triggered when we start talking about people and then start gesturing to this average/normal platonic homunculus as if they represent humanity, especially in the context of using biological "truths" to justify/explain social phenomena.
-
Idk man, I love touching my friend's feet
My cat's paws I mean (My cat is my friend)
I can only touch it for like 1 second and quickly retreat. It's tempting to touch it for longer, but it's risky (I can get PAW'ed; aka: she swings the paws at me)
Don't mean to brag, but I had a cat who would let me touch her feet and even grab those BEANS.
-
I'm not surprised since your OP is boilerplate nudist justification and not really any exploration of paraphilia.
I think there's a mile in between puritanical shame and thinking the body isn't and shouldn't be considered sexual and is fit for public consumption. Why is it important to desexualize the human body? What's the benefit?
wrote on last edited by [email protected]My guy we are literally the only creature on the entire planet with a sense of shame who covers our body. If you don't think there's benefit to at least understanding why this enormous difference exists, I can't even begin to fathom what your mind is like
-
deer god
I suppose that's what I get for commenting first thing in the morning! No point fixing it now, it's too funny.
I may just start writing "Deer god" anyways because that is so majestic.
-
So many possibilities just flushed down the toilet...
Oh well. There they go. A shame I guess.
Anyway.
-
I kinda would rather be attracted to feet, if I'm honest.
I oscillate between wishing I was attracted to basically everyone with every possible kink (outside of the unethical options) and no attraction at all.
