They're trying to normalize calling vibe coding a "programming paradigm," don't let them.
-
I wonder if this is how scholars reacted to the printing press
the printing press didn't unlawfully steal content and print exabytes of shit-streaked garbage.
the printing press expanded the potential for knowledge to be shared at a higher volume and speed due to the nature of mass printing.
it was more akin to multi-core hyperthreading than AI.
I think what you mean is that AI is like the discovery of distribution of electricity. the story of where a self-educated immigrant attempted to sell his method of distribution that was safer and more pragmatic, was slandered and tormented by a tech oligarch that had no qualms with electrocuting elephants in public. oh and not to mention Thomas Edison didn't even "invent" AC power, he stamped his name on it and falsely claimed he did. sounds like some other tech bro we know today...
this is the problem with you "AI bros", you can't even provide a valid argument because your brain has turned to dog shit from using AI 100% of the time.
-
I don't know what vibe coding is, but I'm assuming it's when you relax in your chair, lean back, place your hands on the keyboard and just type. Let the vibes guide your code.
I also don't know what vibe coding is, but my guess is it's coding while high.
-
NGL I'm waiting for the first lawsuit where an engineer is sued by a company by vibe coding as they were told and caused irreparable harm to the company as the whole product has to be redone from the ground up.
caused irreparable harm to the company as the whole product has to be redone from the ground up
Lol this is most projects for most companies I've worked for, long before AI came on the scene. Somehow these multi-year multi-million dollar disasters were never fatal.
-
i tried that one time. it was the only time i tried to use AI for something actually useful that i needed. i wanted to write some simple JavaScript that would rapidly flash 3 equally sized images on the screen of a handheld linux machine. the AI provided a list of instructions of software and other prerequisites i would need. after installing everything and entering in the code provided into the software, it immediately started yelling warning signs at me about the code. nothing ran. it was all useless. it felt like talking to a paranoid schizophrenic. the ai was so sure of the code, and insisted that i must be making a mistake, and kept apologizing and providing more useless code. it was literally just like talking to a paranoid schizophrenic at a bus stop, insisting all the crazy shit they're saying REALLY makes sense, if only you'll let them explain it to you further.
what trash.
Given how it "learns", asking for the same homework questions people have asked for on stack overflow a thousand times already would likely give a decent answer.
Asking it something new will produce plausible looking gibberish.
It has no idea which is which. It doesn't know where the limits of its knowledge lie. It just knows that the answer looks like code and is very confident, and that any follow up issues can be dealt with by outputting more nonsense code and an excuse.
-
These AIs really suck at writing correct code but I've had good success in having them write code generators. I recently made it write a script that takes a SQL create table statement and converts in to TS and gives insert update, delete and whatnot and also creates a simple class that handles the operations.
I had to write the original code by hand but having it write code that writes boilerplate which I correct is pretty good.
Other code is hit or miss IMO
I consider boilerplate code output like that to be well within reach of simple tools though. Tools that didn't need a year to learn from hundreds of terabytes of examples, 20GB of VRAM, or the power use of a small city.
-
OPEN ME YOUR MIND
-
I wonder if this is how scholars reacted to the printing press
Independently of what your position to vibe-coding or LLMs are: Vibe coding just isn't any programming paradigm.
A programming paradigm describes the structure of the program, often on a grammatical (programming language) level (e.g. declarative vs imperative).
While "Vibe Coding" can lead to using one or the other paradigm, but is not a paradigm itself, it's a tool to achieve that, similar as using an IDE with code-completion to generate code. -
I consider boilerplate code output like that to be well within reach of simple tools though. Tools that didn't need a year to learn from hundreds of terabytes of examples, 20GB of VRAM, or the power use of a small city.
wrote on last edited by [email protected]Don't get me wrong, I still write more than 98% of code by hand and of course, I can write those functions myself in 30m myself but I can get it in 60s with the AI. LLMs can write code to that does parse - > model - > map - > format with only one or two easy to fix bugs.
It's in the very niche cases where it's just tedious to write something out that LLMs actually work. "Write an API client that uses [library] that handles these requests/responses" comes also to mind as something that would work.
I'm using now also to learn react native where I get bugs I'm very unfamiliar with and SO doesn't give me a good answer.
I've also had decent success at having it review my code with "how would I further optimise this code" and it gives me some pointers and then writes buggy code but the approach is correct usually and I can implement it myself.
-
I don't know what vibe coding is, but I'm assuming it's when you relax in your chair, lean back, place your hands on the keyboard and just type. Let the vibes guide your code.
Almost, finish that first sentence with "the ChatGPT prompt and copy-paste the result without reading."
-
i tried that one time. it was the only time i tried to use AI for something actually useful that i needed. i wanted to write some simple JavaScript that would rapidly flash 3 equally sized images on the screen of a handheld linux machine. the AI provided a list of instructions of software and other prerequisites i would need. after installing everything and entering in the code provided into the software, it immediately started yelling warning signs at me about the code. nothing ran. it was all useless. it felt like talking to a paranoid schizophrenic. the ai was so sure of the code, and insisted that i must be making a mistake, and kept apologizing and providing more useless code. it was literally just like talking to a paranoid schizophrenic at a bus stop, insisting all the crazy shit they're saying REALLY makes sense, if only you'll let them explain it to you further.
what trash.
I had a fun one this week! I needed to make an SQL query that would aggregate rows by invoice and date, but only aggregate 5 then overflow to a new row. I also needed to access the individual row data because the invoice items weren't summed, they were displayed on separate columns!
I ask my senior if there's an easy way to do this, he comes back with "chatgpt says you can assign row numbers then get individual row data with % row number"
I go to Gemini and ask "how to aggregate rows by 5 and get individual row data out?" It says "you can't" (since when has Ai's been able to say you can't do X) So I ask it about the modulo operator and it gives me an example that doesn't really work. After screwing around for a while I give up and decide I'll just run this query 3 times. 1 for rows 1-5 then for 6-10 and one more for 11-15 that's so many rows surely no one will break this.
-
Tf is "return oriented"?
wrote on last edited by [email protected]Do you know what a memory stack and assembly are?
If you want code that does assembly operations A, B, and then C, you might be able to accomplish it by scanning loaded memory (or its corresponding binary) for bits that, when translated into assembly, do:
A
D
return
This set of three instructions is a gadget. In practice, it's a location in memory.
And then you find another gadget.
B
C
return
Then, if you don't care about D, or D does something irrelevant that won't screw up what you're trying to do, or won't crash the program, you can replace the stack with the addresses of gadgets one and two. When gadget one returns, the stack is popped and then gadget two executes.
Since the computer did ADBC and D was irrelevant, the system executed your ABC malware and now you win.
Is finding gadgets that execute actual malware hard? Surprisingly not!
-
This post did not contain any content.
Vibe coding is closer to script kiddy
