'Baby shark, doo, doo.' Popular kids' song used to deter the homeless
-
This will drive them insane, but it will not deter them.
Soon, the city will be dealing with a bunch of unfortunate folks who are not only poor, but also enraged.
There you go, berserked homeless people!
“Ok, we hear you, but how can we add the irresistible craving to eat human flesh into the mix?” - the business owners, probably.
-
This post did not contain any content.
How about getting everyone who's upset that they have to see homeless people and blinding them with hot pokers? That should work it out and we wouldn't need to pay royalties.
-
What should they be doing? They shouldn't try to keep their businesses going?
Housing, rehabilitating and educating homeless people costs the same or less than funding their persecution, prosecution and incarceration while solving the problem instead of perpetuating it
-
Housing, rehabilitating and educating homeless people costs the same or less than funding their persecution, prosecution and incarceration while solving the problem instead of perpetuating it
wrote on last edited by [email protected]and the business is the one deciding these things?
Like. I get it.
The way we treat homeless people sucks in this country.
It shouldn't be that way. But the business isn't the one setting those policies here. That's on LA and the CA governments. And while yes, some of the business interests are voicing opinions here... the barber shop and the landlords here aren't big enough to have any pull. Many are just looking for ways to end it... and would fully support doing housing-first strategies and all that. (because they work.)
-
Literally psyops instead of helping.
The people who did this are the characters you see getting shot in the movies and don't feel bad about it.No one in power wants to help the homeless, progressive or regressive. Don't pin this on 'evil' people, no meaningful social service growth has happened in ANY of our lifetimes and I'm fucking ancient by internet standards
-
What should they be doing? They shouldn't try to keep their businesses going?
If they want the benefits of a highly capitalist society, paying customers, they have to deal with the fallout of a highly capitalist society: a large and unassisted homeless population
-
Housing, rehabilitating and educating homeless people costs the same or less than funding their persecution, prosecution and incarceration while solving the problem instead of perpetuating it
The people doing this enjoy the cruelty, they feel those that fall through the cracks should be smashed, and when those bodies cleared, the next slightly less poor group will be crushed
again and again
Until it's only the ultra wealthy being served by the grateful remainders of every other class who they deign to allow to survive
Just like the plan
-
This will drive them insane, but it will not deter them.
Soon, the city will be dealing with a bunch of unfortunate folks who are not only poor, but also enraged.
There you go, berserked homeless people!
And then they call the swat team to clear their camps and accidentally concuss and paralyze a few of them
-
How about getting everyone who's upset that they have to see homeless people and blinding them with hot pokers? That should work it out and we wouldn't need to pay royalties.
You are kinder than I would be
-
Literally psyops instead of helping.
The people who did this are the characters you see getting shot in the movies and don't feel bad about it.Let's do more of that.
-
What should they be doing? They shouldn't try to keep their businesses going?
Bad faith argument.
Do you understand how to help humans, or do you simp for businesses?
-
and the business is the one deciding these things?
Like. I get it.
The way we treat homeless people sucks in this country.
It shouldn't be that way. But the business isn't the one setting those policies here. That's on LA and the CA governments. And while yes, some of the business interests are voicing opinions here... the barber shop and the landlords here aren't big enough to have any pull. Many are just looking for ways to end it... and would fully support doing housing-first strategies and all that. (because they work.)
Businesses just bought the election for the fucking president. They can buy policy that helps humans.
-
You are kinder than I would be
Like Jesus, in fact.
-
Businesses just bought the election for the fucking president. They can buy policy that helps humans.
wrote on last edited by [email protected]You think every business wanted Trump?
C’mon. That was a relatively few, large, businesses. Be realistic. The barber that’s looking at losing his business, the others in that building had to leave or close.
The landlord, who can’t get tenants to move in.
They probably weren’t trumpers anymore than you were, and I doubt very much they would resist an actual solution to the problems they’re facing.
-
Let's do more of that.
Shooting them?
-
This post did not contain any content.
Did they pay for the rights to play the song publicly?
-
What should they be doing? They shouldn't try to keep their businesses going?
They shouldn't try to keep their businesses going?
Try to keep their business going by bullying in the public space? That doesn't seem like something a business should do in the first place.
-
This post did not contain any content.
What little shits
-
This post did not contain any content.
So were they deterred? Did this help them find a home?
-
No one in power wants to help the homeless, progressive or regressive. Don't pin this on 'evil' people, no meaningful social service growth has happened in ANY of our lifetimes and I'm fucking ancient by internet standards
So good people are doing this?
Or trying to kick the "ugly" away isn't evil, and is moray acceptable?What's your stance exactly?
