Programmer paradigm shift... Have YOU made the shift??? 🫵
-
wrote on last edited by [email protected]This post did not contain any content.
-
This post did not contain any content.
You use AI to code for you.
I alone use the wrong type of hammer to slowly and frustratedly get very basic tasks accomplished once every season if I'm lucky...
we are not the same.
-
This post did not contain any content.
I've forgotten more about CS fundamentals than you've ever whippersnappered
-
This post did not contain any content.
TBH I can wait for these fucks to find out that their kindergarden approach to programming won't work. I'll charge a premium to fix their shit later.
-
This post did not contain any content.
-
Then why does it have vibe-d?
-
Then why does it have vibe-d?
Vibe-D predates vibe coding by at least a decade.
-
Vibe-D predates vibe coding by at least a decade.
I've been vibe coding for several decades, they're not gonna co opt that shit
-
wrote on last edited by [email protected]
I feel it's more true for Nim-lang. No dealing with pointers (it's possible, just not a normal thing like
int**, Nim has newer memory management options like arc/orc). There's also stuff likefor i in 0 .. 9(and ranges like that have more options/uses too)**I mean I guess there is overlap (both languages have UFCS and interop). So it might come down to syntax or specific implementation. Though I imagine for those who like the braces style, there are other options to look at like Zig (or Rust, there is complexity but also popularity).
I know there is some difficulty when it comes to a language being niche (at least when lacking knowledge), and that's certainly my experience with Nim.
* the asterisk is instead used for public+importable
** I guess D does have this as
foreach (i; 0 .. 3), though not quite the same -
This post did not contain any content.
