Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

agnos.is Forums

  1. Home
  2. Programmer Humor
  3. top 5 unsolved problems in computer science

top 5 unsolved problems in computer science

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Programmer Humor
programmerhumor
52 Posts 29 Posters 1 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • raccoonball@lemm.eeR [email protected]

    Wow, getright! That's a throwback. I used that in the 90s.

    On linux I use aria2c for similar tasks. It can resume http downloads, as well as split them up into multiple threads for faster downloading.

    It's cli-based and powerful (therefore perhaps a bit confusing at first), but there are UIs for it as well for a more get-rightty experience.

    I think jdownloader also has some application here, though it's mostly for getting things from those ad-filled file hosting sites frequently used by those on the high seas

    appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.comA This user is from outside of this forum
    appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.comA This user is from outside of this forum
    [email protected]
    wrote on last edited by
    #38

    Why would you multithread it except for heaving mutiple paths of entry to your home connection or you are getting a throttle from the file hoster?

    raccoonball@lemm.eeR 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.comA [email protected]

      Why would you multithread it except for heaving mutiple paths of entry to your home connection or you are getting a throttle from the file hoster?

      raccoonball@lemm.eeR This user is from outside of this forum
      raccoonball@lemm.eeR This user is from outside of this forum
      [email protected]
      wrote on last edited by
      #39

      Basically that. I don't do it much anymore, but it used to be helpful.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • W [email protected]

        If only there was a way to copy text, and then paste it someplace else. Sigh... unsolved problems.

        E This user is from outside of this forum
        E This user is from outside of this forum
        [email protected]
        wrote on last edited by
        #40

        Yeah, really unfortunate that that's not possible. Always having to take a screenshot and then type out letter by letter what's on the screenshot, that can be quite annoying.

        But even if copying text was possible, the reason people post pictures of text is to give proper attribution, but also to distance themselves from the content, so that it's clear that they don't necessarily hold the exact same opinion or that they might not have all the knowledge to defend the statements in the post.

        Cross-posting could fill that same roll without screenshotting text.

        W 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • E [email protected]

          Yeah, really unfortunate that that's not possible. Always having to take a screenshot and then type out letter by letter what's on the screenshot, that can be quite annoying.

          But even if copying text was possible, the reason people post pictures of text is to give proper attribution, but also to distance themselves from the content, so that it's clear that they don't necessarily hold the exact same opinion or that they might not have all the knowledge to defend the statements in the post.

          Cross-posting could fill that same roll without screenshotting text.

          W This user is from outside of this forum
          W This user is from outside of this forum
          [email protected]
          wrote on last edited by
          #41

          the reason people post pictures of text is to give proper attribution, but also to distance themselves from the content,

          If only we had some way to reference an original source. Something like a figurative link, if you will.

          E 1 Reply Last reply
          1
          • W [email protected]

            the reason people post pictures of text is to give proper attribution, but also to distance themselves from the content,

            If only we had some way to reference an original source. Something like a figurative link, if you will.

            E This user is from outside of this forum
            E This user is from outside of this forum
            [email protected]
            wrote on last edited by
            #42

            That would be cool, but human brains are weirdos. If you're already copying text, you could've edited or annotated it, for example. For example, if it's an opinion you don't entirely agree with, you might feel obliged to say so, because you have the ability to do so when it's a text post.

            If you want to call that irrational, I'm not arguing against that. I'm just saying it's the reality we live in and I'd like to have tooling to deal with that better, because I would also prefer text to not be screenshotted.

            W 1 Reply Last reply
            1
            • E [email protected]

              That would be cool, but human brains are weirdos. If you're already copying text, you could've edited or annotated it, for example. For example, if it's an opinion you don't entirely agree with, you might feel obliged to say so, because you have the ability to do so when it's a text post.

              If you want to call that irrational, I'm not arguing against that. I'm just saying it's the reality we live in and I'd like to have tooling to deal with that better, because I would also prefer text to not be screenshotted.

              W This user is from outside of this forum
              W This user is from outside of this forum
              [email protected]
              wrote on last edited by
              #43

              human brains are weirdos.

              Truer words were never said. 🙂

              1 Reply Last reply
              1
              • W [email protected]

                Don't most browsers support this?

                but not all web servers. often it's disabled

                tatterdemalion@programming.devT This user is from outside of this forum
                tatterdemalion@programming.devT This user is from outside of this forum
                [email protected]
                wrote on last edited by
                #44

                Oof, that's unfortunate. I can't say I've run into this problem though.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • L [email protected]

                  cross-posted from: https://lemmy.today/post/30790048

                  M This user is from outside of this forum
                  M This user is from outside of this forum
                  [email protected]
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #45

                  I recently wanted to send a file from Linux to an old tablet over Bluetooth. Can't be done apparently. I can send it to my phone, a windows laptop can send it to the tablet, but my Linux PC apparently can't. Still baffled about it.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  3
                  • D [email protected]

                    Steam does as well.

                    I found out recently that KDE has a "Focus stealing prevention" in their settings and it has been glorious.

                    M This user is from outside of this forum
                    M This user is from outside of this forum
                    [email protected]
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #46

                    Ooh! I need to look that up.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    3
                    • W [email protected]

                      this is not a defined thing in markdown, just the markdown renderers of some clients do it

                      S This user is from outside of this forum
                      S This user is from outside of this forum
                      [email protected]
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #47

                      This here is apparently the original source of the markdown specification, and there it clearly says that this is the correct behaviour: https://daringfireball.net/projects/markdown/syntax#list

                      Ordered lists use numbers followed by periods:

                      1. Bird
                      2. McHale
                      3. Parish

                      It’s important to note that the actual numbers you use to mark the list have no effect on the HTML output Markdown produces. The > HTML Markdown produces from the above list is:

                      <ol>
                      <li>Bird</li>
                      <li>McHale</li>
                      <li>Parish</li>
                      </ol>

                      If you instead wrote the list in Markdown like this:

                      1. Bird
                      2. McHale
                      3. Parish

                      or even:

                      1. Bird
                      2. McHale
                      3. Parish

                      you’d get the exact same HTML output

                      W 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • S [email protected]

                        This here is apparently the original source of the markdown specification, and there it clearly says that this is the correct behaviour: https://daringfireball.net/projects/markdown/syntax#list

                        Ordered lists use numbers followed by periods:

                        1. Bird
                        2. McHale
                        3. Parish

                        It’s important to note that the actual numbers you use to mark the list have no effect on the HTML output Markdown produces. The > HTML Markdown produces from the above list is:

                        <ol>
                        <li>Bird</li>
                        <li>McHale</li>
                        <li>Parish</li>
                        </ol>

                        If you instead wrote the list in Markdown like this:

                        1. Bird
                        2. McHale
                        3. Parish

                        or even:

                        1. Bird
                        2. McHale
                        3. Parish

                        you’d get the exact same HTML output

                        W This user is from outside of this forum
                        W This user is from outside of this forum
                        [email protected]
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #48

                        hmm, you are right. it's not actually a bug in the renderer then

                        S 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • W [email protected]

                          hmm, you are right. it's not actually a bug in the renderer then

                          S This user is from outside of this forum
                          S This user is from outside of this forum
                          [email protected]
                          wrote on last edited by [email protected]
                          #49

                          The only difference to the standard that I see is that the standard says it should be 1,2,3,4,5, while at least for me it renders as 5,6,7,8,9.

                          But that's probably because it doesn't render as HTML and thus doesn't rely on HTML to do the numbering.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • L [email protected]

                            cross-posted from: https://lemmy.today/post/30790048

                            huntresshimbo@lemmy.zipH This user is from outside of this forum
                            huntresshimbo@lemmy.zipH This user is from outside of this forum
                            [email protected]
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #50

                            Applications that steal focus more than once in their startup are the real devil

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            4
                            • L [email protected]

                              cross-posted from: https://lemmy.today/post/30790048

                              U This user is from outside of this forum
                              U This user is from outside of this forum
                              [email protected]
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #51

                              My other pet peeves besides these:

                              • Android locking screen a second before I jab the screen, every single time
                              • YouTube app. Android and smart TVs. What's wrong with it? (Vague overall gesturing) It's garbage. How is one of the biggest tech companies in the world able to ship this and expect people to pay money for subscriptions is beyond me.
                              L 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • U [email protected]

                                My other pet peeves besides these:

                                • Android locking screen a second before I jab the screen, every single time
                                • YouTube app. Android and smart TVs. What's wrong with it? (Vague overall gesturing) It's garbage. How is one of the biggest tech companies in the world able to ship this and expect people to pay money for subscriptions is beyond me.
                                L This user is from outside of this forum
                                L This user is from outside of this forum
                                [email protected]
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #52

                                Android in general is trash.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                Reply
                                • Reply as topic
                                Log in to reply
                                • Oldest to Newest
                                • Newest to Oldest
                                • Most Votes


                                • Login

                                • Login or register to search.
                                • First post
                                  Last post
                                0
                                • Categories
                                • Recent
                                • Tags
                                • Popular
                                • World
                                • Users
                                • Groups