Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

agnos.is Forums

  1. Home
  2. memes
  3. Programmers, is this accurate

Programmers, is this accurate

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved memes
memes
33 Posts 27 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • 30p87@feddit.org3 [email protected]

    https://lunduke.locals.com/post/5111104/no-the-c-mascot-is-not-a-diseased-rat-named-keith

    A This user is from outside of this forum
    A This user is from outside of this forum
    [email protected]
    wrote on last edited by
    #22

    If Brian Lunduke says it's false, it must be true.

    1 Reply Last reply
    5
    • Z [email protected]

      C++ gives you enough rope to shoot yourself in the foot. If you did not know rope could do that you should have read the manual.

      It's like a chainsaw with all the bells and whistles but all the safety features removed. Sure you can chop wood with it really fast and probably stone too if you #include diamondteeth library, you can even hammer in nails if you #include hammer. But you are alone responsible for your safety and it's probably not the best tool for any given job.

      V This user is from outside of this forum
      V This user is from outside of this forum
      [email protected]
      wrote on last edited by
      #23

      You should also really be using the latest chainsaw model with new safety features, but your workplace swears by the gas guzzling piece of shit from 1996

      M B 2 Replies Last reply
      5
      • V [email protected]

        You should also really be using the latest chainsaw model with new safety features, but your workplace swears by the gas guzzling piece of shit from 1996

        M This user is from outside of this forum
        M This user is from outside of this forum
        [email protected]
        wrote on last edited by [email protected]
        #24

        The new safety features all break down under stress and make the tool as safe as the 1996 piece as soon as you put them in a dangerous environment.

        Also, both the new and the 1996 pieces have hidden explosives that were placed there by the new tooling used to build them. Nobody will tell you where they are, you should know that already. Don't hit them.

        V anyoldname3@lemmy.worldA 2 Replies Last reply
        1
        • G [email protected]

          Stallman didn't draw it but I would argue in the absence of any other mascot the fact that some people have eaten the onion and believe it sort of does make it the de facto C++ mascot...

          A This user is from outside of this forum
          A This user is from outside of this forum
          [email protected]
          wrote on last edited by
          #25

          Language prescriptivists in shambles

          1 Reply Last reply
          1
          • V [email protected]

            You should also really be using the latest chainsaw model with new safety features, but your workplace swears by the gas guzzling piece of shit from 1996

            B This user is from outside of this forum
            B This user is from outside of this forum
            [email protected]
            wrote on last edited by
            #26

            I loved when my IDE would warn me that my code wasn't deterministic unless I used c++11 or newer compilers because previous versions technically didn't define how it should work, so every compiler handled it differently.

            And all the times I had to specify C++11 because it had features I needed, and suddenly it was a huge headache because the testing pipeline wasn't REALLY compatible, it just said it was, and then handed it off to manual review.
            Something I didn't know until 6 months after I started using it...

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • S [email protected]

              machinist@lemmy.worldM This user is from outside of this forum
              machinist@lemmy.worldM This user is from outside of this forum
              [email protected]
              wrote on last edited by
              #27

              Apache Pig from the image filename.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • pugjesus@lemmy.worldP [email protected]
                This post did not contain any content.
                G This user is from outside of this forum
                G This user is from outside of this forum
                [email protected]
                wrote on last edited by
                #28

                I would assume so since c++ was made as a joke.

                1 Reply Last reply
                1
                • M [email protected]

                  The new safety features all break down under stress and make the tool as safe as the 1996 piece as soon as you put them in a dangerous environment.

                  Also, both the new and the 1996 pieces have hidden explosives that were placed there by the new tooling used to build them. Nobody will tell you where they are, you should know that already. Don't hit them.

                  V This user is from outside of this forum
                  V This user is from outside of this forum
                  [email protected]
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #29

                  Do they? As long as you use RAII and modern shit and keep to something like GCC, it should be safe, right?

                  I don't do C++ these days

                  M 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • pugjesus@lemmy.worldP [email protected]
                    This post did not contain any content.
                    A This user is from outside of this forum
                    A This user is from outside of this forum
                    [email protected]
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #30

                    I pronounce it "Cee Tee Tee"

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    1
                    • M [email protected]

                      The new safety features all break down under stress and make the tool as safe as the 1996 piece as soon as you put them in a dangerous environment.

                      Also, both the new and the 1996 pieces have hidden explosives that were placed there by the new tooling used to build them. Nobody will tell you where they are, you should know that already. Don't hit them.

                      anyoldname3@lemmy.worldA This user is from outside of this forum
                      anyoldname3@lemmy.worldA This user is from outside of this forum
                      [email protected]
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #31

                      Like a real powertool, if you unscrew the safety features because you feel they're getting in your way, they no longer provide safety. Having the guard from a chainsaw in your back pocket does nothing to protect you from the chainsaw you're holding.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      1
                      • V [email protected]

                        Do they? As long as you use RAII and modern shit and keep to something like GCC, it should be safe, right?

                        I don't do C++ these days

                        M This user is from outside of this forum
                        M This user is from outside of this forum
                        [email protected]
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #32

                        it should be safe, right?

                        Are you phishing for an Anakin / Padme meme?

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • L [email protected]

                          This is how Keith looks in the hands of Python "programmers". While being cared by normal specialists, Keith looks gorgeous and healthy. And can do super cool tricks too.

                          Z This user is from outside of this forum
                          Z This user is from outside of this forum
                          [email protected]
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #33

                          Yes, but takes it a lot more time, while newer and better system languages exist. D even has the advantage of building upon C instead of OCaml (like Rust and a lot of its competitors did), but if you want to opt-out from the garbage collection, you'll also have to opt-out from most mainstream D libraries.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          Reply
                          • Reply as topic
                          Log in to reply
                          • Oldest to Newest
                          • Newest to Oldest
                          • Most Votes


                          • Login

                          • Login or register to search.
                          • First post
                            Last post
                          0
                          • Categories
                          • Recent
                          • Tags
                          • Popular
                          • World
                          • Users
                          • Groups