Perfect date
-
11-006-2025 ?
wrote on last edited by [email protected]11-Jun-2025
It's shit format but at least it's better than 11.6.2025 or 6/11/2025
-
11-Jun-2025
-
Waiting for the ISO 8601 & 9001 gang to show up and promote YYYY-MM-DD.
Edit: That took seconds, a very punctual bunch.
RFC 3339 if you please. Let's be prescriptive.
-
Waiting for the ISO 8601 & 9001 gang to show up and promote YYYY-MM-DD.
Edit: That took seconds, a very punctual bunch.
It's the only way that makes sense
-
They should also add a timezone since most of us don't live at UTC zero timezones -> 2012-12-28T18:12:33+09:00
They did; the
Zat the end denotes UTC. -
I know. I started using the format with periods back in the 90s, before I knew of the standard, and at this point doing it with periods is muscle memory. That's not meant as an excuse, just an explanation. The excuse is laziness.
-
MM/DD/YY for me.
Edit: I learned something new today.
I stand by this man, do your worst Lemmy.
-
Waiting for the ISO 8601 & 9001 gang to show up and promote YYYY-MM-DD.
Edit: That took seconds, a very punctual bunch.
YYYY-MM-... well, ya know the deal...
-
Waiting for the ISO 8601 & 9001 gang to show up and promote YYYY-MM-DD.
Edit: That took seconds, a very punctual bunch.
That's ... why I'm here
-
For computing or sorting purposes, YYYY-MM-DD is best. But in day to day writing a date, I prefer DD-MON-YYYY.
Single letter for month is too ambiguous - how do you tell apart June, July and January? Also, what do O and N denote?
-
Waiting for the ISO 8601 & 9001 gang to show up and promote YYYY-MM-DD.
Edit: That took seconds, a very punctual bunch.
wrote on last edited by [email protected]Anyone that gives me a document or receipt or invoice with a date formatted DD-MM-YYYY should have a tire iron swung at their thighs
Multiple swings if they can't decide on using DD-MM-YYYY or MM-DD-YYYY or DD-MM-YY or MM-DD-YY or YY-MM-DD or YY-DD-MM
-
Waiting for the ISO 8601 & 9001 gang to show up and promote YYYY-MM-DD.
Edit: That took seconds, a very punctual bunch.
As a big ISO 8601 guy myself, I request explanation of this 9001 addition? Never heard of it till now and am optimistic
-
Don't go with this psycho! He mixes European style order with US style punctuation.
common in Belgium, probably other countries too
-
MM/DD/YY for me.
Edit: I learned something new today.
Stop it Patrick you're scaring them!
-
This post did not contain any content.
Nice ragebaiting.
-
MM/DD/YY for me.
Edit: I learned something new today.
I never downvote people on Lemmy but I did for this one .... I just spent the past month going through some invoicing and paper receipts and it is absolutely infuriating to still see some businesses using MM-DD-YY while others insist on DD-MM-YY and some businesses have invoicing and receipt printers that use one or the other but not the same. It's not a big deal if you are dealing with documents that are a month or two old because you can guess from what time period they come from ... but it is absolutely confusing if documents get older than that.
-
Single letter for month is too ambiguous - how do you tell apart June, July and January? Also, what do O and N denote?
wrote on last edited by [email protected]Seems you missed the point, it's first three letters of the month, not one.
Edit: seems I missed the joke on the post. -
Seems you missed the point, it's first three letters of the month, not one.
Edit: seems I missed the joke on the post.The O is for the kind of whooshing sound
-
MM/DD/YY for me.
Edit: I learned something new today.
I escaped reddit for this?
-
RFC 3339 if you please. Let's be prescriptive.
After all the self-important blowhards in the committe were satisified that they had put their fingerprint on the ISO8601 document with bullshit like "year-month-week" format support and signed off, they went home.
The rest stayed behind, waited a few minutes to be safe, and then quickly made RFC3339 like a proper standard.
This is what RFC3339 vs ISO8601 feels like.
