Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

agnos.is Forums

  1. Home
  2. memes
  3. I have no info, yet I must meme

I have no info, yet I must meme

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved memes
memes
11 Posts 9 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • S [email protected]

    S This user is from outside of this forum
    S This user is from outside of this forum
    [email protected]
    wrote on last edited by
    #2

    ELI5 why there's not enough information?

    U B F 3 Replies Last reply
    1
    • S [email protected]

      sadsadsatellite@lemmy.dbzer0.comS This user is from outside of this forum
      sadsadsatellite@lemmy.dbzer0.comS This user is from outside of this forum
      [email protected]
      wrote on last edited by [email protected]
      #3

      Between 35 and 51.if we assume a reasonable stacking technique for stability, every box not on top can be supported on 3 sides at 40.

      We also don't know that every box is the same size. With that format screw it could be as low as 21.

      This is why mechanical diagrams include an isometric view and xray lines.

      Edit: I see now it specifies cubes, so the number couldn't be 21, but it could still be less than 35. I'm not figuring that one out.

      Also why can't you see the trailer in the top view when it protrudes on the sides?

      lumidaub@feddit.orgL 1 Reply Last reply
      4
      • S [email protected]

        ELI5 why there's not enough information?

        U This user is from outside of this forum
        U This user is from outside of this forum
        [email protected]
        wrote on last edited by
        #4

        Think about the two blocks on the right of the side view forming the step in the middle row. What’s behind them? Are you assuming it’s the full truck width of three? How do you know it isn’t a bit of a “false front” and it’s only one deep, or two? What if one is three “deep” and the only is only one? What about the center? Maybe it’s “hollow” on the inside?

        1 Reply Last reply
        1
        • S [email protected]

          ELI5 why there's not enough information?

          B This user is from outside of this forum
          B This user is from outside of this forum
          [email protected]
          wrote on last edited by
          #5

          Do you know if theres empty space on the inside of those 3 stacks or are they cubes? Not enough information to solve the problem

          1 Reply Last reply
          2
          • S [email protected]

            ELI5 why there's not enough information?

            F This user is from outside of this forum
            F This user is from outside of this forum
            [email protected]
            wrote on last edited by
            #6

            Because in each view you only know whether there is 0 or at least 1 block in each column. So we can set a lower bound of 35 and an upper bound of 51. The actual number can be anything in between.

            owenfromcanada@lemmy.caO 1 Reply Last reply
            2
            • sadsadsatellite@lemmy.dbzer0.comS [email protected]

              Between 35 and 51.if we assume a reasonable stacking technique for stability, every box not on top can be supported on 3 sides at 40.

              We also don't know that every box is the same size. With that format screw it could be as low as 21.

              This is why mechanical diagrams include an isometric view and xray lines.

              Edit: I see now it specifies cubes, so the number couldn't be 21, but it could still be less than 35. I'm not figuring that one out.

              Also why can't you see the trailer in the top view when it protrudes on the sides?

              lumidaub@feddit.orgL This user is from outside of this forum
              lumidaub@feddit.orgL This user is from outside of this forum
              [email protected]
              wrote on last edited by
              #7

              Also why can't you see the trailer in the top view when it protrudes on the sides?

              Perspective. The artist obviously kept in mind that the cubes are closer to the viewer so from that point of view they'd overlap the narrow edge of the trailer. A true master.

              S 1 Reply Last reply
              3
              • F [email protected]

                Because in each view you only know whether there is 0 or at least 1 block in each column. So we can set a lower bound of 35 and an upper bound of 51. The actual number can be anything in between.

                owenfromcanada@lemmy.caO This user is from outside of this forum
                owenfromcanada@lemmy.caO This user is from outside of this forum
                [email protected]
                wrote on last edited by
                #8

                And that's assuming that all the boxes are the same size. There could be many more than 51 if they're "hiding" in the middle.

                1 Reply Last reply
                1
                • lumidaub@feddit.orgL [email protected]

                  Also why can't you see the trailer in the top view when it protrudes on the sides?

                  Perspective. The artist obviously kept in mind that the cubes are closer to the viewer so from that point of view they'd overlap the narrow edge of the trailer. A true master.

                  S This user is from outside of this forum
                  S This user is from outside of this forum
                  [email protected]
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #9

                  This is incredible

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • S [email protected]

                    openstars@piefed.socialO This user is from outside of this forum
                    openstars@piefed.socialO This user is from outside of this forum
                    [email protected]
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #10

                    That is not a trailer, and those are not cubes. According to René Magritte's Treachery of images, this is just a picture. You can't fool me, memer person! 🤪

                    S 1 Reply Last reply
                    1
                    • openstars@piefed.socialO [email protected]

                      That is not a trailer, and those are not cubes. According to René Magritte's Treachery of images, this is just a picture. You can't fool me, memer person! 🤪

                      S This user is from outside of this forum
                      S This user is from outside of this forum
                      [email protected]
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #11

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      Reply
                      • Reply as topic
                      Log in to reply
                      • Oldest to Newest
                      • Newest to Oldest
                      • Most Votes


                      • Login

                      • Login or register to search.
                      • First post
                        Last post
                      0
                      • Categories
                      • Recent
                      • Tags
                      • Popular
                      • World
                      • Users
                      • Groups