Telegram CEO to leave fortune to over 100 children he fathered
-
Why are all these fucking weirdos like he, Epstein, Musk obsessed with having the most progeny? Fucking malignant narcissists.
Must be something with psychopaths, for all I know about it was very important to have many children.
Stronger primal instincts maybe, and not augmented by responsibility or fear or love.
-
Luckily narcissism isn’t inherited, it’s learned. But you know what else is inherited? Money.
That being said, I don’t have a lot of faith in the morals of a parent who’d have a kid for the money.
Narcissism (NPL) is inherited and it's not learned. It's a DSM condition.
If you mean just being a jerk, then that doesn't look like this. That looks like Eichmann.
-
Did people read the article? He's been doing sperm donation for 15+ years, and wants to leave his inheritance to also be split with the kids that have come from sperm donation. Isn't this a good thing?
It's not like he's personally impregnated women for 100+ children. Which it seems to be what the comments here are reacting to?
Not saying this billionaire is a saint or anything, but it really doesn't look like people here are reading past the headline...
Why not just tax the money lmao
-
OK new rule, when someone gets to net worth of a billion dollars we give them an award, say congratulations you win capitalism, the. Take them out the back and shoot them. Creepy fucks.
-
Why not just tax the money lmao
wrote on last edited by [email protected]Because we live in corporate dictatorships so wealth redistribution is the devil.
-
What. The. Fuck.
FTA
Mr Durov, 40, said he is the official father of six children with three partners. He started sperm donation 15 years ago and added that more than 100 babies were conceived that way.
-
This post did not contain any content.
I think I'm missing something because you don't usually donate sperm and then act like it's your children afterwards. It sounds like a creepy move to insert himself in the lives of a bunch of families.
-
Did people read the article? He's been doing sperm donation for 15+ years, and wants to leave his inheritance to also be split with the kids that have come from sperm donation. Isn't this a good thing?
It's not like he's personally impregnated women for 100+ children. Which it seems to be what the comments here are reacting to?
Not saying this billionaire is a saint or anything, but it really doesn't look like people here are reading past the headline...
It's not like he's personally impregnated women for 100+ children.
Would have been a legend if he did though.
-
I think I'm missing something because you don't usually donate sperm and then act like it's your children afterwards. It sounds like a creepy move to insert himself in the lives of a bunch of families.
He can insert whatever he wants if he's leaving me a portion of his fortune.
-
This post did not contain any content.
It should be redistributed to the countries he stole it from
-
Because we live in corporate dictatorships so wealth redistribution is the devil.
It's fine if they are his bastard children, just as long as he has some blood relationship to the people he redistributes the wealth to
That's not weird at all...
-
Hey I like this idea. I want my own dog park!
-
If you're a billionaire, that's 10M dollars given per child assuming no taxes
I was thinking of the logistics to set it up initially, but yeah to billionairres its probably easier to hire that out or something.
-
I was thinking of the logistics to set it up initially, but yeah to billionairres its probably easier to hire that out or something.
Trusts don't pay inheritance tax, and LTD companies don't pay capital gains. Loophole's everywhere, by design
-
This post did not contain any content.
Wow you kind of got to feel bad for his six real children. He says he sees no difference between any of his children. He sees no difference between the six kids he supposedly raised, or I guess his Nanny's raised I don't know, and the 95 Plus children who came from sperm donations. What a fucked up thing to say. What a bizarre way of looking at the world.
-
Did people read the article? He's been doing sperm donation for 15+ years, and wants to leave his inheritance to also be split with the kids that have come from sperm donation. Isn't this a good thing?
It's not like he's personally impregnated women for 100+ children. Which it seems to be what the comments here are reacting to?
Not saying this billionaire is a saint or anything, but it really doesn't look like people here are reading past the headline...
That's not the issue though I think most people think it's gross because it was specifically done to get as many progeny as possible. I'm not arguing he's a racist or bigot but the quiver full mentality is specifically racist.
-
This post did not contain any content.wrote on last edited by [email protected]
Wow, his view of what makes someone your child is the absolute opposite of what I believe. Any child I raise is "my child". Anyone who considers me their mom is "my child", no matter who their biological parents are.
And, thankfully I've never been in a position to have to give one up for adoption but if so, I would say the parents who raised them are the parents, not me.
I really don't think he's their dad. If he wants to be a mysterious benefactor who gives them money because their moms used his sperm, that's not an awful thing to do, but saying they are his children is lunacy.
I sure hope he doesn't have any stepchildren, as presumably they'd be left out of this largesse.
-
Wow you kind of got to feel bad for his six real children. He says he sees no difference between any of his children. He sees no difference between the six kids he supposedly raised, or I guess his Nanny's raised I don't know, and the 95 Plus children who came from sperm donations. What a fucked up thing to say. What a bizarre way of looking at the world.
his six real children
I mean, he fathered them. They're his biological children. And he's a billionaire, so its not like he doesn't have enough cash to spread around. No one is going hungry.
I guess his Nanny’s raised I don’t know
Right. The dude just wanted to maximize his baby-making rate. He didn't want to be a father. He just wanted to have offspring because he's in a Quiverfull cult in Silicon Valley that considers your number of children some kind of high score.
What a bizarre way of looking at the world.
That's billionaires for you. Abolish them.
-
It's fine if they are his bastard children, just as long as he has some blood relationship to the people he redistributes the wealth to
That's not weird at all...
In a 100 years, we're going to have wars between the scions of the various Sacred Houses of Silicon Valley, as people kill one another for being part of a heretical bloodline.
-
Why are all these fucking weirdos like he, Epstein, Musk obsessed with having the most progeny? Fucking malignant narcissists.
They literally think they are part of a Master Race and that their magic jizz will create a future line of ubermensch.
It's esoteric fascism.
