Safety
-
Going to be fun putting all these monsters on trial after Trump is gone.
-
Going to be fun putting all these monsters on trial after Trump is gone.
wrote on last edited by [email protected]Honey, trials don't convict fascists. That's a fundamental misunderstanding of law.
Fucking shiro ishi ended uo dean of tokyo medical school. Nobotsuke kishi's dynasty only ended when some guy killed his grandson with a home made electric shotgun. Most of the italian fascists, aside from Mussolini, who notably did not get a trial, ended uo employed by the cia.
Germany wasn't much better.
You don't give nazis trials.
-
Honey, trials don't convict fascists. That's a fundamental misunderstanding of law.
Fucking shiro ishi ended uo dean of tokyo medical school. Nobotsuke kishi's dynasty only ended when some guy killed his grandson with a home made electric shotgun. Most of the italian fascists, aside from Mussolini, who notably did not get a trial, ended uo employed by the cia.
Germany wasn't much better.
You don't give nazis trials.
I feel like the end result will be like Nuremberg. Sure. Some of them got light sentences. But a lot of the leadership hung.
-
I feel like the end result will be like Nuremberg. Sure. Some of them got light sentences. But a lot of the leadership hung.
The ones whose names everyone knew, and not even all those. That's not what trials are for.
-
Given nobody has shot at ice agents, I doubt based on statistics alone that you would actually do it
Never say never. Keep an eye on the news, I guess.
️ -
Would it be in poor taste to call these people jihadist?
-
Would it be in poor taste to call these people jihadist?
They're terrorists by any definition of the term, jihadists suggests they adhere to the idea of jihad which seems a little far fetched
-
They're terrorists by any definition of the term, jihadists suggests they adhere to the idea of jihad which seems a little far fetched
wrote on last edited by [email protected]Boo, but jihad just means holy war like Allah means God. I literally learned the word jihad from playing FF8. When do we take borrowed words literally versus phonetically?
-
Boo, but jihad just means holy war like Allah means God. I literally learned the word jihad from playing FF8. When do we take borrowed words literally versus phonetically?
Anytime you want
-
They will be doing this to citizens standing in line to vote.
-
Going to be fun putting all these monsters on trial after Trump is gone.
Going to be fun putting all these monsters on trial
Gonna be fun watching democrats be like "trust the system! the wheels of justice turn slowly!" until it's too late. Again.
-
Boo, but jihad just means holy war like Allah means God. I literally learned the word jihad from playing FF8. When do we take borrowed words literally versus phonetically?
When words are taken into another language, their meanings often change from the original usages though
-
This is very similar to what the nazi and the soviets did. Removing people under pretext of law with no regard to process or people. It doesn't seem as extreme but the course is definitely clear.
To the troll that keeps regurgitating "illegal aliens" rhetoric. Dressing up with masks and shit doesn't grant one an authority to pick people of the streets. Any "leader" that enables this just wants chaos and doesn't give a fuck about the nation. It's just tyranny under the guise of patriotism. It happened many times before.
-
Americans are about to ruin the neck gaitor
-
Worse.
Gestapo did not wear masks and they had their legal documentation/warrants ready and available. They were not hiding.
wrote on last edited by [email protected]All public facing media was controlled by the state in Germany. That's not possible anymore without killing all the electronics and means of sharing media, aka the internet.
-
Why aren't masked and armed individuals with weapons and no badges, that make attempts to abduct people, being shot?
wrote on last edited by [email protected]Probably because the Democrats are so anti-gun/weapon. The target demographic probably leans anti-weapon, even if they're not necessarily Democrats. The combination keeps them more vulnerable. It's even worse when carrying weapons in these areas is outright banned: no training, no permits, only police. The safety of the group is generally prioritized over the safety of the individual. Which, like here, can be a problem.
From how they're acting, it seems only a matter of time. They seem to check all of the boxes for a lethal or deadly force in nearly every state, even the strict ones. An unidentified suspiciously dressed group aggressively surrounding you and preventing your retreat? Lethal/deadly force can often be used to defend another person. Someone else can shoot these idiots in plain clothes with no identification.
Even if "police" identify themselves late, it seems to be setting themselves up for a weak defense
-
This is very similar to what the nazi and the soviets did. Removing people under pretext of law with no regard to process or people. It doesn't seem as extreme but the course is definitely clear.
To the troll that keeps regurgitating "illegal aliens" rhetoric. Dressing up with masks and shit doesn't grant one an authority to pick people of the streets. Any "leader" that enables this just wants chaos and doesn't give a fuck about the nation. It's just tyranny under the guise of patriotism. It happened many times before.
Well put, Mr. Satan
-
Where's the well regulated militia you Americans scream about so loudly when someone suggests not letting a mentally ill child own an assault rifle?
Isn't this exactly the government tyranny that argument is used to defend against?
wrote on last edited by [email protected]A lot of these areas have much more stringent gun laws. Yes, they can own the guns, but they can't carry them. Carrying/displaying will probably get them arrested and charged with a weapons felony.
I'm usually told we've moved beyond the need for people to do that. Then we should just leave the use of force to the police: The organizations that consistently seem to try to prove we can't trust them. I agree, the police should be an organization Americans can trust: How can we make them that way?
Does anyone see the irony?
- U.S. conservatives "trust" the police, but still want civilians to be armed.
- U.S. "leftists" distrust the police, but want them to be the only ones armed.
The U.S. never fixed their trust issues with police. So this seems like the logical result.
-
Going to be fun putting all these monsters on trial after Trump is gone.
Haha good one.
-
The ones whose names everyone knew, and not even all those. That's not what trials are for.
People don't like these historical facts.
They prefer to live in fairy tale where Mossad hunted every Nazi down and killed them. Makes it easierto cope with the reality I guess
