It is what it is
-
This post did not contain any content.
-
This post did not contain any content.
Um was this surprising to anyone? I think we all assumed that this was the case no???
-
This post did not contain any content.
I don’t believe for a second that they are actually going to delete any data they stole from users.
-
Um was this surprising to anyone? I think we all assumed that this was the case no???
Doesn't it specifically say on a new incognito tab that this doesn't protect against sites or service providers from gathering information....and only stops you from storing local information (history, cookies, etc)? Do people actually think that incognito is adding privacy protection?
-
Doesn't it specifically say on a new incognito tab that this doesn't protect against sites or service providers from gathering information....and only stops you from storing local information (history, cookies, etc)? Do people actually think that incognito is adding privacy protection?
That was actually a result of this issue, where Google placed misleading statements in incognito and then proceeded to actively go around them.
-
This post did not contain any content.
-
This post did not contain any content.
Incognito was literally only good for opening a second session without you logged in. It did zero for privacy. Even their disclaimer said so.
-
This post did not contain any content.
Am I the only one who only used incognito by accident when intending to select "open in new tab" from the context menu?
-
I don’t believe for a second that they are actually going to delete any data they stole from users.
Oops offshore backup mysteriously occurred.
-
Incognito was literally only good for opening a second session without you logged in. It did zero for privacy. Even their disclaimer said so.
Incognito, you mean porn mode?
-
Incognito, you mean porn mode?
wrote on last edited by [email protected]Its a moot point once you sign into your Facebook account to "share with friends"
-
Am I the only one who only used incognito by accident when intending to select "open in new tab" from the context menu?
That's literally the only time I've ever used it. Knowing what it is, I don't even need it. I have the settings set to erase all my history and most other stuff upon closing the browser. Which is exactly what incognito mode does, but temporarily for a single tab session.
-
Doesn't it specifically say on a new incognito tab that this doesn't protect against sites or service providers from gathering information....and only stops you from storing local information (history, cookies, etc)? Do people actually think that incognito is adding privacy protection?
It has somewhat of a privacy protection because it's incapable of keeping cookies. The bar is in hell, but it passed it.
-
Incognito was literally only good for opening a second session without you logged in. It did zero for privacy. Even their disclaimer said so.
firefox containers are amazing for this
-
Its a moot point once you sign into your Facebook account to "share with friends"
-
This post did not contain any content.
Incognito/Private Browsing came about when people were sharing computers more often. It doesn’t save history and cookies and whatnot on your device. It’s to prevent the next user from getting in to your bank account.
Google and whoever else will still know your IP and can use that to cross-reference whatever other data they have on you.
-
"He's the one who knocks!"
-
firefox containers are amazing for this
Firefox -p "Spanky"
-
I don’t believe for a second that they are actually going to delete any data they stole from users.
Of course they will! First you make a copy, then you delete the copy. Contractual terms satisfied.
-
firefox containers are amazing for this
Except it only keeps cookies separated, history is shared over all containers.
